Comparisons between Low-Intensity Resistance Training with Moderate Blood Flow Restriction and High-Intensity Resistance Training on Quadriceps Muscle Strength and Mass

Christopher K. Carroll, Tyson Eckel Bs, Gabriel Walker Bs
{"title":"Comparisons between Low-Intensity Resistance Training with Moderate Blood Flow Restriction and High-Intensity Resistance Training on Quadriceps Muscle Strength and Mass","authors":"Christopher K. Carroll, Tyson Eckel Bs, Gabriel Walker Bs","doi":"10.4172/2324-9080.1000257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Elderly and rehabilitating populations who are unable to exercise under high loads are likely to experience muscle atrophy. Low intensity blood flow restriction training (LI-BFRT) can promote increases muscle mass comparable to conventional high-intensity resistance training (HI). However, strength discrepancies have been reported between LI-BFRT and HI programs. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine whether similar muscle strength and power improvements are found in both 1RM and non-specific strength tests between LI-BFRT and HI groups. \nMethods: Six male subjects (x age 20.8 years ± 1.6) free of any musculoskeletal disorders with no anaerobic resistance training in the 6 weeks prior to testing participated in 4 week strength exercise program. Pre- and post- force and power tests were assessed using a 1RM test and a triaxial accelerometer (Myotest® SA) to measure power and velocity during a squat jump (SJ) and countermovement jump (CMJ). Subjects were randomly assigned one of two groups: LI-BFRT (40% 1RM at 40% arterial occlusion for 3 sets of 15 reps) or HI (80% 1RM for 3 sets of 8 reps). Both groups completed leg extensions twice a week for 4 weeks on a leg-extension machine. \nResults: Significant increase in LI-BFRT for SJ power x= 42.2 W/ kg ± 3.6, SJ Power x= 45.7 W/kg ± 3.3; p=0.037, CMJ Velocity x= 245 cm/s ± 1.4, CMJ Velocity x= 269 cm/s ± 2.1; p=0.014 and 1RM x= 112.5kg ± 18.4, 1RM x =138.8kg ± 20.4; p=0.006.) was observed. No significant change was observed in the HI group. \nConclusion: The LI-BFRT subjects power output increased over the 4-week program. Improvements may be attributed to the neuromuscular adaptation that occurred through intervention. This pilot study suggests that BFRT could promote or increases muscle power comparable to results observed after conventional highintensity(HI) resistance training, when measured via non-specific muscular strength tests.","PeriodicalId":90574,"journal":{"name":"Journal of athletic enhancement","volume":"136 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of athletic enhancement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2324-9080.1000257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Elderly and rehabilitating populations who are unable to exercise under high loads are likely to experience muscle atrophy. Low intensity blood flow restriction training (LI-BFRT) can promote increases muscle mass comparable to conventional high-intensity resistance training (HI). However, strength discrepancies have been reported between LI-BFRT and HI programs. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine whether similar muscle strength and power improvements are found in both 1RM and non-specific strength tests between LI-BFRT and HI groups. Methods: Six male subjects (x age 20.8 years ± 1.6) free of any musculoskeletal disorders with no anaerobic resistance training in the 6 weeks prior to testing participated in 4 week strength exercise program. Pre- and post- force and power tests were assessed using a 1RM test and a triaxial accelerometer (Myotest® SA) to measure power and velocity during a squat jump (SJ) and countermovement jump (CMJ). Subjects were randomly assigned one of two groups: LI-BFRT (40% 1RM at 40% arterial occlusion for 3 sets of 15 reps) or HI (80% 1RM for 3 sets of 8 reps). Both groups completed leg extensions twice a week for 4 weeks on a leg-extension machine. Results: Significant increase in LI-BFRT for SJ power x= 42.2 W/ kg ± 3.6, SJ Power x= 45.7 W/kg ± 3.3; p=0.037, CMJ Velocity x= 245 cm/s ± 1.4, CMJ Velocity x= 269 cm/s ± 2.1; p=0.014 and 1RM x= 112.5kg ± 18.4, 1RM x =138.8kg ± 20.4; p=0.006.) was observed. No significant change was observed in the HI group. Conclusion: The LI-BFRT subjects power output increased over the 4-week program. Improvements may be attributed to the neuromuscular adaptation that occurred through intervention. This pilot study suggests that BFRT could promote or increases muscle power comparable to results observed after conventional highintensity(HI) resistance training, when measured via non-specific muscular strength tests.
中等血流量限制的低强度阻力训练与高强度阻力训练对股四头肌力量和质量的比较
目的:老年人和康复人群不能在高负荷下运动,容易出现肌肉萎缩。低强度血流量限制训练(LI-BFRT)可以促进肌肉质量的增加,与传统的高强度阻力训练(HI)相当。然而,LI-BFRT和HI项目之间存在强度差异。因此,本研究的目的是检查LI-BFRT组和HI组之间在1RM和非特异性力量测试中是否发现相似的肌肉力量和力量改善。方法:6名男性受试者(年龄20.8±1.6岁),无任何肌肉骨骼疾病,测试前6周未进行无氧阻力训练,参加为期4周的力量训练计划。使用1RM测试和三轴加速度计(Myotest®SA)来评估蹲跳(SJ)和反动作跳(CMJ)期间的力量和速度测试的前后力和功率测试。受试者被随机分配为两组:LI-BFRT (40% 1RM, 40%动脉闭塞,3组,15次)或HI (80% 1RM, 3组,8次)。两组均在伸腿机上每周进行两次伸腿,持续4周。结果:SJ功率x= 42.2 W/kg±3.6,SJ功率x= 45.7 W/kg±3.3时,LI-BFRT显著增加;p=0.037, CMJ速度x= 245 cm/s±1.4,CMJ速度x= 269 cm/s±2.1;p=0.014, 1RM x= 112.5kg±18.4,1RM x= 138.8kg±20.4;P =0.006)。HI组未见明显变化。结论:LI-BFRT受试者的功率输出在4周的计划中增加。改善可能归因于通过干预发生的神经肌肉适应。这项初步研究表明,当通过非特异性肌肉力量测试测量时,BFRT可以促进或增加与传统高强度(HI)阻力训练后观察到的结果相当的肌肉力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书