Can Clinical Genetics Laboratories be Sued for Medical Malpractice?

A. Foulkes, Jessica Roberts, P. Appelbaum, W. Chung, E. Clayton, B. Evans, G. Marchant
{"title":"Can Clinical Genetics Laboratories be Sued for Medical Malpractice?","authors":"A. Foulkes, Jessica Roberts, P. Appelbaum, W. Chung, E. Clayton, B. Evans, G. Marchant","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3542537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical genetics laboratories are handling more patient information than ever before, including genetic data that has no established clinical significance. Those labs could face legal liability if that previously uncertain information gains clinical significance and a laboratory fails to notify the impacted patients. Should patients choose to sue clinical genetics labs, what body of law will govern: medical malpractice or ordinary negligence? We conducted a fifty-state survey assessing whether clinical laboratories are “health care providers” for the purposes of medical malpractice to answer this question. We found that six states expressly include laboratories or laboratory personnel in their statutory definition of health care provider, fifteen states have judicial opinions that treat laboratories as health care providers, and four states have caselaw concluding that laboratories are not health care providers. Thus, twenty-five states have yet to decide this important threshold matter. We therefore conclude that the legislatures in these states should provide clarity regarding the potential medical malpractice liability of clinical genetics laboratories.","PeriodicalId":92869,"journal":{"name":"Annals of health law and life sciences","volume":"23 1","pages":"153-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of health law and life sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3542537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Clinical genetics laboratories are handling more patient information than ever before, including genetic data that has no established clinical significance. Those labs could face legal liability if that previously uncertain information gains clinical significance and a laboratory fails to notify the impacted patients. Should patients choose to sue clinical genetics labs, what body of law will govern: medical malpractice or ordinary negligence? We conducted a fifty-state survey assessing whether clinical laboratories are “health care providers” for the purposes of medical malpractice to answer this question. We found that six states expressly include laboratories or laboratory personnel in their statutory definition of health care provider, fifteen states have judicial opinions that treat laboratories as health care providers, and four states have caselaw concluding that laboratories are not health care providers. Thus, twenty-five states have yet to decide this important threshold matter. We therefore conclude that the legislatures in these states should provide clarity regarding the potential medical malpractice liability of clinical genetics laboratories.
临床遗传学实验室可以因医疗事故被起诉吗?
临床遗传学实验室正在处理比以往更多的患者信息,包括没有确定临床意义的遗传数据。如果先前不确定的信息获得临床意义,并且实验室没有通知受影响的患者,这些实验室可能面临法律责任。如果患者选择起诉临床遗传学实验室,将由什么样的法律体系来管辖:医疗事故还是普通过失?为了回答这个问题,我们进行了一项50个州的调查,评估临床实验室是否为医疗事故的“卫生保健提供者”。我们发现,6个州明确将实验室或实验室人员包括在其医疗保健提供者的法定定义中,15个州有将实验室视为医疗保健提供者的司法意见,4个州有判例法得出实验室不是医疗保健提供者的结论。因此,有25个州尚未决定这一重要的门槛问题。因此,我们得出结论,这些州的立法机构应该明确临床遗传学实验室潜在的医疗事故责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信