Pseudo-nitzschia in New Zealand and the role of DNA probes and immunoassays in refining marine biotoxin monitoring programmes.

Lesley Rhodes, Chris Scholin, Ian Garthwaite
{"title":"Pseudo-nitzschia in New Zealand and the role of DNA probes and immunoassays in refining marine biotoxin monitoring programmes.","authors":"Lesley Rhodes, Chris Scholin, Ian Garthwaite","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1522-7189(199805/08)6:3/4<105::AID-NT13>3.0.CO;2-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Domoic acid (DA) was first detected in shellfish in New Zealand after the implementation of a comprehensive biotoxin monitoring programme for amnesic, paralytic, diarrhetic and neurotoxic shellfish toxins, following a suspected neurotoxic shellfish poisoning (NSP) event in early 1993. Both phytoplankton monitoring and shellfish flesh testing programmes have led to an extensive database which has helped link species of Pseudo-nitzschia to specific DA outbreaks. In 1994, P. pungens and P. turgidula were associated with DA contamination of shellfish, and cultured isolates of these species proved to be toxin producers. During 1996 the use of species-specific ribosomal RNA (rRNA)-targeted oligonucleotide probes and DA immunoassays led to the discovery of toxin production by P. fraudulenta, and showed the nontoxic P. heimii to be a major bloom former. Pseudo-nitzschia delicatissima, P. pseudodelicatissima and P. multiseries, also identified using rRNA-targeted probes, have been linked to DA contamination of New Zealand shellfish; P. australis is the main cause of DA in scallops. The relative amnesic shellfish poisoning (ASP) risk associated with different species, largely determined by DA immunoassays of cultured isolates, is now used by some regulators to refine risk assessments. Species identification is therefore vital so that shellfish growers, and health and industry officials, can make safe and economically sound harvesting decisions. The development and field trialling of DNA probes is proving invaluable in this context.","PeriodicalId":18777,"journal":{"name":"Natural toxins","volume":"119 1","pages":"105-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"71","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural toxins","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-7189(199805/08)6:3/4<105::AID-NT13>3.0.CO;2-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 71

Abstract

Domoic acid (DA) was first detected in shellfish in New Zealand after the implementation of a comprehensive biotoxin monitoring programme for amnesic, paralytic, diarrhetic and neurotoxic shellfish toxins, following a suspected neurotoxic shellfish poisoning (NSP) event in early 1993. Both phytoplankton monitoring and shellfish flesh testing programmes have led to an extensive database which has helped link species of Pseudo-nitzschia to specific DA outbreaks. In 1994, P. pungens and P. turgidula were associated with DA contamination of shellfish, and cultured isolates of these species proved to be toxin producers. During 1996 the use of species-specific ribosomal RNA (rRNA)-targeted oligonucleotide probes and DA immunoassays led to the discovery of toxin production by P. fraudulenta, and showed the nontoxic P. heimii to be a major bloom former. Pseudo-nitzschia delicatissima, P. pseudodelicatissima and P. multiseries, also identified using rRNA-targeted probes, have been linked to DA contamination of New Zealand shellfish; P. australis is the main cause of DA in scallops. The relative amnesic shellfish poisoning (ASP) risk associated with different species, largely determined by DA immunoassays of cultured isolates, is now used by some regulators to refine risk assessments. Species identification is therefore vital so that shellfish growers, and health and industry officials, can make safe and economically sound harvesting decisions. The development and field trialling of DNA probes is proving invaluable in this context.
新西兰的伪尼茨奇病和DNA探针和免疫测定在改进海洋生物毒素监测方案中的作用。
在1993年初发生一起疑似神经毒性贝类中毒事件后,新西兰对失忆症、麻痹症、腹泻和神经毒性贝类毒素实施全面生物毒素监测方案后,首次在贝类中检测到软骨藻酸。浮游植物监测和贝类肉检测项目已经建立了一个广泛的数据库,帮助将伪尼茨氏菌的种类与特定的DA暴发联系起来。1994年,pungens和P. turgidula与贝类的DA污染有关,这些物种的培养分离物被证明是毒素的产生者。1996年,利用物种特异性核糖体RNA (rRNA)靶向寡核苷酸探针和DA免疫分析,发现假单胞藻产生毒素,并表明无毒的假单胞藻是一种主要的华前菌。伪美味尼索氏菌(pseudonitzschia delicatissima)、伪美味尼索氏菌(P. pseudodelicatissima)和多系列尼索氏菌(P. multiseries)也被rrna靶向探针发现,它们与新西兰贝类的DA污染有关;australis是造成扇贝DA的主要原因。与不同物种相关的相对失忆性贝类中毒(ASP)风险,主要由培养分离物的DA免疫测定确定,现在被一些监管机构用于完善风险评估。因此,物种鉴定至关重要,以便贝类养殖者以及卫生和行业官员能够做出安全和经济上合理的捕捞决定。在这种情况下,DNA探针的发展和实地试验证明是无价的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信