On writing ‘involved’ political geography

D. Newman
{"title":"On writing ‘involved’ political geography","authors":"D. Newman","doi":"10.1016/0260-9827(91)90033-Q","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social scientists know that one person's ‘truth’ may be another person's ‘propaganda’. Both (and also other) perspectives may be valid… Legitimate differences of opinion are to be expected, respected and encouraged—unless there is a bogus basis to the research and thus ‘findings’. It is hoped that scholars in all states will always he open to accepting others' views and that research will not be condemned just because it is ‘different’ or perhaps because of the respective state in which the scholars live. (Knight, 1990).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101034,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography Quarterly","volume":"10 3","pages":"Pages 195-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0260-9827(91)90033-Q","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/026098279190033Q","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Social scientists know that one person's ‘truth’ may be another person's ‘propaganda’. Both (and also other) perspectives may be valid… Legitimate differences of opinion are to be expected, respected and encouraged—unless there is a bogus basis to the research and thus ‘findings’. It is hoped that scholars in all states will always he open to accepting others' views and that research will not be condemned just because it is ‘different’ or perhaps because of the respective state in which the scholars live. (Knight, 1990).

写“涉及”的政治地理
社会科学家知道,一个人的“真理”可能是另一个人的“宣传”。两种(以及其他)观点可能都是有效的……合理的不同意见是应该被期待、尊重和鼓励的——除非研究和所谓的“发现”有虚假的基础。希望所有国家的学者都能接受他人的观点,而研究不会因为“不同”或学者所在的州而受到谴责。(骑士,1990)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信