An interlaboratory in vitro aerosol exposure system reference study

D. Thorne, J. Adamson, E. T. Sticken, R. Wieczorek, H. Behrsing, S. Steiner, Shoaib Majeed, S. Frentzel, S. Ishikawa, S. Ito, L. Simms, K. Yoshino, J. Hoeng, M. Gaca
{"title":"An interlaboratory in vitro aerosol exposure system reference study","authors":"D. Thorne, J. Adamson, E. T. Sticken, R. Wieczorek, H. Behrsing, S. Steiner, Shoaib Majeed, S. Frentzel, S. Ishikawa, S. Ito, L. Simms, K. Yoshino, J. Hoeng, M. Gaca","doi":"10.1177/2397847321992752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the complexity of inhaled substances, the aerosol exposure environment has seen diversification and development of setups in conjunction with the evolving in vitro toxicology space. Each laboratory uses its in vitro exposure system differently (different protocols, adaptations, and biological analysis). Unfortunately, as systems diversify, so does the complexity of comparing multiple systems in a “standardized” manner. As yet, no one has compared simply whether these diverse systems can all generate a consistent aerosol stream, which is paramount prior to transit and exposure. This study has compared, at source, aerosol generation (using nicotine as an exposure marker) in nine in vitro whole-aerosol exposure setups (seven different systems) across five distinct geographically independent locations, including the UK, the USA, Switzerland, Germany, and Japan. The results demonstrate that, despite system-wide differences (adaptations, nuances, and application), these systems—when appropriately maintained and used under a prescribed set of established conditions can all generate a consistent and statistically comparable aerosol stream. These data will be invaluable for new researchers and established laboratories, so they may benchmark against this study. Finally, this interlaboratory comparison combined with the wealth of transit and exposure interface data, may help the environment move towards a truly validated and consistent approach to aerosol exposure. Such an approach could be replicated for other aerosolized products, such as e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products.","PeriodicalId":23155,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology Research and Application","volume":"220 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology Research and Application","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2397847321992752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Given the complexity of inhaled substances, the aerosol exposure environment has seen diversification and development of setups in conjunction with the evolving in vitro toxicology space. Each laboratory uses its in vitro exposure system differently (different protocols, adaptations, and biological analysis). Unfortunately, as systems diversify, so does the complexity of comparing multiple systems in a “standardized” manner. As yet, no one has compared simply whether these diverse systems can all generate a consistent aerosol stream, which is paramount prior to transit and exposure. This study has compared, at source, aerosol generation (using nicotine as an exposure marker) in nine in vitro whole-aerosol exposure setups (seven different systems) across five distinct geographically independent locations, including the UK, the USA, Switzerland, Germany, and Japan. The results demonstrate that, despite system-wide differences (adaptations, nuances, and application), these systems—when appropriately maintained and used under a prescribed set of established conditions can all generate a consistent and statistically comparable aerosol stream. These data will be invaluable for new researchers and established laboratories, so they may benchmark against this study. Finally, this interlaboratory comparison combined with the wealth of transit and exposure interface data, may help the environment move towards a truly validated and consistent approach to aerosol exposure. Such an approach could be replicated for other aerosolized products, such as e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products.
实验室间体外气溶胶暴露系统参考研究
鉴于吸入物质的复杂性,随着体外毒理学领域的发展,气溶胶暴露环境也出现了多样化和设置的发展。每个实验室使用其体外暴露系统的方式不同(不同的方案、适应性和生物分析)。不幸的是,随着系统的多样化,以“标准化”方式比较多个系统的复杂性也在增加。到目前为止,还没有人简单地比较过这些不同的系统是否都能产生一致的气溶胶流,这在过境和暴露之前是至关重要的。本研究从源头上比较了包括英国、美国、瑞士、德国和日本在内的五个不同地理位置的九个体外全气溶胶暴露装置(七个不同的系统)中气溶胶的产生(使用尼古丁作为暴露标记)。结果表明,尽管系统范围存在差异(适应性、细微差别和应用),但这些系统在适当的维护和在规定的既定条件下使用时,都可以产生一致的、统计上可比较的气溶胶流。这些数据对于新的研究人员和已建立的实验室来说将是无价的,因此他们可能会以这项研究为基准。最后,这种实验室间的比较与丰富的传输和暴露界面数据相结合,可能有助于环境朝着真正有效和一致的气溶胶暴露方法发展。这种方法可以复制到其他雾化产品,如电子烟和加热烟草产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信