ASSESSMENT AND RETROFITTING OF A RC BUILDING THROUGH A MULTI-HAZARD APPROACH: SEISMIC RESISTANCE AND ROBUSTNESS

M. Scalvenzi, F. Freddi, F. Parisi
{"title":"ASSESSMENT AND RETROFITTING OF A RC BUILDING THROUGH A MULTI-HAZARD APPROACH: SEISMIC RESISTANCE AND ROBUSTNESS","authors":"M. Scalvenzi, F. Freddi, F. Parisi","doi":"10.7712/120121.8594.18712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most of the existing buildings in seismic prone regions have been built before the publication of modern design provisions against seismic events and progressive collapse. Nonetheless, some studies have highlighted the possible interaction between earthquake resistance and structural robustness, the latter being of interest to either individual extreme hazards (e.g., blast, impact, fire) or interacting hazards (e.g., landslides produced by seismic events). While retrofit strategies to improve the seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) structures have been widely investigated since many years, the topic of mitigation strategies against progressive collapse received very little attention. Progressive collapse can be described as a special type of structural collapse that involves several components of the structure as consequence of an initial localised damage. The present study aims at investigating whether and how much seismic retrofitting may improve not only the earthquake resistance but also robustness. A four-storey, five-bay, RC frame building designed according to Eurocode 2 is considered as a case study. The frame was assessed by evaluating: 1) the capacity of the structure to redistribute loads after a local damaging event; 2) the seismic capacity of the structure. Non-linear static analyses, i.e., PushDown and PushOver analyses, were carried out in OpenSees to evaluate the robustness and seismic resistance of the structure, respectively. The progressive collapse capacity was evaluated under two relevant column-removal scenarios, i.e., the sudden loss of an internal and an external column, while the seismic resistance was assessed under two load distributions, i.e., proportional to the first vibration mode and to the inertia masses. Subsequently, the impact of retrofitting with carbon fibre-reinforced polymers on both structural robustness and seismic resistance was evaluated. The use of the retrofit measure allowed, on the one hand, the removal of all the shear failures due to horizontal seismic actions and, on the other hand, to increase the robustness of the structure.","PeriodicalId":66281,"journal":{"name":"地震工程与工程振动","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"地震工程与工程振动","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7712/120121.8594.18712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most of the existing buildings in seismic prone regions have been built before the publication of modern design provisions against seismic events and progressive collapse. Nonetheless, some studies have highlighted the possible interaction between earthquake resistance and structural robustness, the latter being of interest to either individual extreme hazards (e.g., blast, impact, fire) or interacting hazards (e.g., landslides produced by seismic events). While retrofit strategies to improve the seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) structures have been widely investigated since many years, the topic of mitigation strategies against progressive collapse received very little attention. Progressive collapse can be described as a special type of structural collapse that involves several components of the structure as consequence of an initial localised damage. The present study aims at investigating whether and how much seismic retrofitting may improve not only the earthquake resistance but also robustness. A four-storey, five-bay, RC frame building designed according to Eurocode 2 is considered as a case study. The frame was assessed by evaluating: 1) the capacity of the structure to redistribute loads after a local damaging event; 2) the seismic capacity of the structure. Non-linear static analyses, i.e., PushDown and PushOver analyses, were carried out in OpenSees to evaluate the robustness and seismic resistance of the structure, respectively. The progressive collapse capacity was evaluated under two relevant column-removal scenarios, i.e., the sudden loss of an internal and an external column, while the seismic resistance was assessed under two load distributions, i.e., proportional to the first vibration mode and to the inertia masses. Subsequently, the impact of retrofitting with carbon fibre-reinforced polymers on both structural robustness and seismic resistance was evaluated. The use of the retrofit measure allowed, on the one hand, the removal of all the shear failures due to horizontal seismic actions and, on the other hand, to increase the robustness of the structure.
通过多危害方法评估和改造钢筋混凝土建筑:抗震和坚固性
大多数地震易发地区的现有建筑都是在针对地震事件和渐进倒塌的现代设计规定发布之前建造的。尽管如此,一些研究强调了抗震能力和结构坚固性之间可能的相互作用,后者对个别极端危险(如爆炸、撞击、火灾)或相互作用危险(如地震事件产生的滑坡)都很感兴趣。虽然改善钢筋混凝土(RC)结构抗震性能的改造策略已被广泛研究多年,但针对渐进倒塌的缓解策略的主题却很少受到关注。渐进性倒塌是一种特殊类型的结构倒塌,它涉及到结构的几个组成部分,这是由于最初的局部损伤造成的。本研究旨在探讨抗震改造是否以及在多大程度上不仅可以提高抗震性,还可以提高坚固性。根据欧洲规范2设计的四层,五间,钢筋混凝土框架建筑被认为是一个案例研究。对框架进行了评估:1)局部损伤事件后结构对荷载重分配的能力;2)结构的抗震能力。在OpenSees中进行非线性静力分析,即PushDown和PushOver分析,分别评估结构的鲁棒性和抗震性能。在两种相关的拆柱情景下,即内部柱和外部柱的突然损失,评估了渐进倒塌能力,而在两种荷载分布下,即与第一振动模态成正比和与惯性质量成正比,评估了抗震性能。随后,对碳纤维增强聚合物对结构坚固性和抗震性能的影响进行了评估。改造措施的使用一方面可以消除由于水平地震作用造成的所有剪切破坏,另一方面可以增加结构的坚固性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4781
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信