Simulation of soil water and nitrate transport in wheat field under various nitrogen fertilizer rates and rainfed conditions using HYDRUS-1D

IF 1.4 Q4 SOIL SCIENCE
Abdelhakim Lahjouj, A. El Hmaidi, Boufala M'hamed, Bouhafa Karima
{"title":"Simulation of soil water and nitrate transport in wheat field under various nitrogen fertilizer rates and rainfed conditions using HYDRUS-1D","authors":"Abdelhakim Lahjouj, A. El Hmaidi, Boufala M'hamed, Bouhafa Karima","doi":"10.37501/soilsa/161944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we used HYDRUS-1D software to simulate soil water and nitrate (NO 3 -N) transport in a rainfed wheat fi eld under various nitrogen (N) fertilizer scenarios (0 to 126 kg ha –1 ) in Mo-rocco. We used inverse modeling to calibrate the input parameters involved in the simulation. The comparison between simulated and measured soil water (SWC) and NO 3 -N contents at different soil layers was carried out using the index of agreement ( d ), determination coe ffi cient ( R 2 ), RMSE , and MAE . By considering the soil pro fi le (0–100 cm), acceptable SWC simulation accuracies were obtained for the calibration and validation steps ( d =0.88–0.94, R 2 =0.67 to 0.80, RMSE =0.034–0.051 cm 3 cm –3 , and MAE =0.024–0.038 cm 3 cm –3 ), while NO 3 -N simulation was less accurate ( d =0.49–0.82, R 2 =0.20–0.58, RMSE =0.015–0.068 mg cm –3 , and MAE =0.012–0.046 mg cm –3 ). In addition, the observed NO 3 -N contents showed a lack of signi fi cant differences in the root zone (20–100 cm) between N fertilizer rates (p>0.05), which was consistent with the lack of N fertilizer effects on simulated NO 3 -N leaching below the soil pro fi le by HYDRUS-1D. The NO 3 -N leached amount accounted for 25 kg ha –1 and was derived mainly from the initial soil N contents. The simulated N balance of the soil pro fi le revealed that volatilization and denitri fi cation were the major pathways of N fertilizer loss, accounting for about 3.8 and 51.7% of the N fertilizer rates, respectively. We suggest further studies to improve the simulation accuracies of HYDRUS-1D using su ffi cient calibration data from long-term wheat experiments to ensure effective N fertilization management in the study area.","PeriodicalId":44772,"journal":{"name":"Soil Science Annual","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Science Annual","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37501/soilsa/161944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we used HYDRUS-1D software to simulate soil water and nitrate (NO 3 -N) transport in a rainfed wheat fi eld under various nitrogen (N) fertilizer scenarios (0 to 126 kg ha –1 ) in Mo-rocco. We used inverse modeling to calibrate the input parameters involved in the simulation. The comparison between simulated and measured soil water (SWC) and NO 3 -N contents at different soil layers was carried out using the index of agreement ( d ), determination coe ffi cient ( R 2 ), RMSE , and MAE . By considering the soil pro fi le (0–100 cm), acceptable SWC simulation accuracies were obtained for the calibration and validation steps ( d =0.88–0.94, R 2 =0.67 to 0.80, RMSE =0.034–0.051 cm 3 cm –3 , and MAE =0.024–0.038 cm 3 cm –3 ), while NO 3 -N simulation was less accurate ( d =0.49–0.82, R 2 =0.20–0.58, RMSE =0.015–0.068 mg cm –3 , and MAE =0.012–0.046 mg cm –3 ). In addition, the observed NO 3 -N contents showed a lack of signi fi cant differences in the root zone (20–100 cm) between N fertilizer rates (p>0.05), which was consistent with the lack of N fertilizer effects on simulated NO 3 -N leaching below the soil pro fi le by HYDRUS-1D. The NO 3 -N leached amount accounted for 25 kg ha –1 and was derived mainly from the initial soil N contents. The simulated N balance of the soil pro fi le revealed that volatilization and denitri fi cation were the major pathways of N fertilizer loss, accounting for about 3.8 and 51.7% of the N fertilizer rates, respectively. We suggest further studies to improve the simulation accuracies of HYDRUS-1D using su ffi cient calibration data from long-term wheat experiments to ensure effective N fertilization management in the study area.
利用HYDRUS-1D模拟不同氮肥施用量和雨养条件下麦田土壤水分和硝酸盐运移
本研究采用HYDRUS-1D软件模拟Mo-rocco不同氮肥方案(0 ~ 126 kg ha -1)下旱作麦田土壤水分和硝态氮(NO 3 -N)的运移。我们使用逆建模来校准仿真中涉及的输入参数。采用一致性指数(d)、测定系数(r2)、RMSE和MAE对不同土层土壤水分(SWC)和NO 3 -N含量的模拟值与实测值进行比较。考虑土壤剖面(0 ~ 100 cm),校准和验证步骤的SWC模拟精度可接受(d =0.88 ~ 0.94, r2 =0.67 ~ 0.80, RMSE =0.034 ~ 0.051 cm ~ 3 cm ~ 3, MAE =0.024 ~ 0.038 cm ~ 3 cm ~ 3),而no3 -N模拟精度较低(d =0.49 ~ 0.82, r2 =0.20 ~ 0.58, RMSE =0.015 ~ 0.068 mg cm ~ 3, MAE =0.012 ~ 0.046 mg cm ~ 3)。此外,在根区(20 ~ 100 cm)不同施氮量间no3 -N含量无显著差异(p>0.05),这与HYDRUS-1D模拟土壤剖面下no3 -N淋溶过程中无施氮效应一致。硝态氮的淋滤量为25 kg ha -1,主要来源于土壤初始氮含量。土壤氮素平衡模拟结果表明,挥发和反硝化是氮肥损失的主要途径,分别占氮肥损失率的3.8%和51.7%。建议进一步研究利用长期小麦试验数据,提高HYDRUS-1D的模拟精度,确保研究区氮肥的有效管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil Science Annual
Soil Science Annual SOIL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: Soil Science Annual journal is a continuation of the “Roczniki Gleboznawcze” – the journal of the Polish Society of Soil Science first published in 1950. Soil Science Annual is a quarterly devoted to a broad spectrum of issues relating to the soil environment. From 2012, the journal is published in the open access system by the Sciendo (De Gruyter).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信