Divine Tobacco: A Paradox Among Health Fascism

Hendra Herman, Hardian Satria Jati, S. Susila, Wempy Setyabudi Hernowo, M. A. Saputra, Pratama Erawan
{"title":"Divine Tobacco: A Paradox Among Health Fascism","authors":"Hendra Herman, Hardian Satria Jati, S. Susila, Wempy Setyabudi Hernowo, M. A. Saputra, Pratama Erawan","doi":"10.12962/j24433527.v14i2.11234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to examine how ideally, the legal system regarding tobacco is related to the conflict of interest in tobacco use for the treatment. The type of research used in this research is normative legal research (normative juridical). Through a statutory approach and a conceptual approach, the aim is to understand the importance of using tobacco as an alternative treatment. By obtaining a clear concept, it is hoped that the norming in the rule of law in the future will no longer have a vague and ambiguous understanding.","PeriodicalId":53374,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Sosial Humaniora","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Sosial Humaniora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12962/j24433527.v14i2.11234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to examine how ideally, the legal system regarding tobacco is related to the conflict of interest in tobacco use for the treatment. The type of research used in this research is normative legal research (normative juridical). Through a statutory approach and a conceptual approach, the aim is to understand the importance of using tobacco as an alternative treatment. By obtaining a clear concept, it is hoped that the norming in the rule of law in the future will no longer have a vague and ambiguous understanding.
神圣的烟草:健康法西斯主义中的悖论
这项研究的目的是检查理想情况下,关于烟草的法律制度是如何与烟草使用治疗的利益冲突相关的。本研究中使用的研究类型是规范法律研究(规范司法)。通过法定方法和概念方法,目的是了解使用烟草作为替代治疗的重要性。通过获得一个清晰的概念,希望未来的法治规范不再有一个模糊和模棱两可的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信