Architectural-rich service users’ experiences within palliative environments: a designerly scoping review

Iris Beuls, Ann Petermans, J. Vanrie
{"title":"Architectural-rich service users’ experiences within palliative environments: a designerly scoping review","authors":"Iris Beuls, Ann Petermans, J. Vanrie","doi":"10.1080/24735132.2023.2226511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract To positively strengthen the relationship between the physical character of a palliative environment (PE) and the service users who reside, visit or work in it, the architectural design process should adopt a human-centred approach. Implementing this approach would imply ‘looking through the eyes of service users’. Since practical and ethical factors seem to prevent architects from engaging directly with service users in PEs, this paper studies the appearance of architectural-rich service users’ experiences within PEs in the existing literature. In addition, we wonder why research knowledge in this field seem to remain confined to academic discourse and how academia can increase the transfer of ‘designerly’ know-how to support the architectural design process of human-centred PEs. In doing so, we propose the designerly scoping review, a methodology that customizes a scoping review in a more relevant and friendly way to architects. This review resulted in thirteen spatial aspects, divided over four atmospheres and linked to actual service users’ experiences with(in) PEs. While the review showed that theoretical knowledge is available in this particular field, the ‘architectural richness’ is often lacking in current literature.","PeriodicalId":92348,"journal":{"name":"Design for health (Abingdon, England)","volume":"55 1","pages":"158 - 179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design for health (Abingdon, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2023.2226511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract To positively strengthen the relationship between the physical character of a palliative environment (PE) and the service users who reside, visit or work in it, the architectural design process should adopt a human-centred approach. Implementing this approach would imply ‘looking through the eyes of service users’. Since practical and ethical factors seem to prevent architects from engaging directly with service users in PEs, this paper studies the appearance of architectural-rich service users’ experiences within PEs in the existing literature. In addition, we wonder why research knowledge in this field seem to remain confined to academic discourse and how academia can increase the transfer of ‘designerly’ know-how to support the architectural design process of human-centred PEs. In doing so, we propose the designerly scoping review, a methodology that customizes a scoping review in a more relevant and friendly way to architects. This review resulted in thirteen spatial aspects, divided over four atmospheres and linked to actual service users’ experiences with(in) PEs. While the review showed that theoretical knowledge is available in this particular field, the ‘architectural richness’ is often lacking in current literature.
在缓和环境中丰富的架构服务用户的体验:设计师的范围审查
为了积极加强缓和环境(PE)的物理特性与在其中居住、访问或工作的服务用户之间的关系,建筑设计过程应采用以人为本的方法。实施这种方法意味着“站在服务用户的角度看问题”。由于实际和道德因素似乎阻碍了建筑师直接与pe中的服务用户接触,因此本文研究了现有文献中pe中具有丰富架构的服务用户体验的外观。此外,我们想知道为什么这个领域的研究知识似乎仍然局限于学术话语,以及学术界如何增加“设计师”知识的转移,以支持以人为本的建筑设计过程。在此过程中,我们提出了设计师式范围审查,这是一种对架构师更相关、更友好的方式定制范围审查的方法。这一审查产生了13个空间方面,分为4个大气,并与实际服务用户的体验相联系。虽然回顾表明在这一特定领域的理论知识是可用的,但“建筑丰富性”在当前文献中往往缺乏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信