Willingness to pay of Nigerian poultry producers and feed millers for aflatoxin‐safe maize

IF 2
A. Johnson, T. Abdoulaye, B. Ayedun, J. Fulton, N. Widmar, A. Adebowale, R. Bandyopadhyay, V. Manyong
{"title":"Willingness to pay of Nigerian poultry producers and feed millers for aflatoxin‐safe maize","authors":"A. Johnson, T. Abdoulaye, B. Ayedun, J. Fulton, N. Widmar, A. Adebowale, R. Bandyopadhyay, V. Manyong","doi":"10.1002/agr.21621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dietary aflatoxin exposure is a widespread problem in the developing world and causes severe negative health consequences to humans and livestock animals. A new biological control product, called Aflasafe, has been introduced in Nigeria to mitigate aflatoxin contamination of maize in the field and in storage. No known prior work has estimated how much African agribusinesses using maize for animal feed will pay for aflatoxin‐safe maize. This study measured the levels of Aflasafe awareness, surveyed current aflatoxin management practices, and estimated, using choice experiments, willingness to pay (WTP) for aflatoxin‐safe maize by Nigerian poultry producers and feed millers. Data was gathered from 272 orally administered surveys, which included discrete choice experiments examining maize purchasing decisions. Results suggest that the proportion of enterprises that were aware of aflatoxin was found to vary across states. Two latent classes of Nigerian poultry producers and feed millers were identified that were willing to pay average premiums of 4.9% and 30.9%, respectively for maize with 10 parts per billion (ppb) aflatoxin concentration relative to maize with 20 ppb aflatoxin concentration. Both latent classes were, on average, willing to pay larger premiums for maize with 4 ppb aflatoxin concentration. There was evidence that latent class membership, and hence WTP, varied based on awareness of aflatoxin and across geographies. JEL CLASSIFICATION D29; I15; O13","PeriodicalId":92748,"journal":{"name":"Agribusiness (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agribusiness (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Dietary aflatoxin exposure is a widespread problem in the developing world and causes severe negative health consequences to humans and livestock animals. A new biological control product, called Aflasafe, has been introduced in Nigeria to mitigate aflatoxin contamination of maize in the field and in storage. No known prior work has estimated how much African agribusinesses using maize for animal feed will pay for aflatoxin‐safe maize. This study measured the levels of Aflasafe awareness, surveyed current aflatoxin management practices, and estimated, using choice experiments, willingness to pay (WTP) for aflatoxin‐safe maize by Nigerian poultry producers and feed millers. Data was gathered from 272 orally administered surveys, which included discrete choice experiments examining maize purchasing decisions. Results suggest that the proportion of enterprises that were aware of aflatoxin was found to vary across states. Two latent classes of Nigerian poultry producers and feed millers were identified that were willing to pay average premiums of 4.9% and 30.9%, respectively for maize with 10 parts per billion (ppb) aflatoxin concentration relative to maize with 20 ppb aflatoxin concentration. Both latent classes were, on average, willing to pay larger premiums for maize with 4 ppb aflatoxin concentration. There was evidence that latent class membership, and hence WTP, varied based on awareness of aflatoxin and across geographies. JEL CLASSIFICATION D29; I15; O13
愿意向尼日利亚家禽生产商和饲料加工厂支付黄曲霉毒素安全玉米的费用
在发展中国家,饮食中的黄曲霉毒素暴露是一个普遍存在的问题,对人类和牲畜的健康造成严重的负面影响。尼日利亚引进了一种名为Aflasafe的新型生物防治产品,以减轻玉米在田间和储存中的黄曲霉毒素污染。没有已知的先前工作估计过使用玉米作为动物饲料的非洲农业企业将为黄曲霉毒素安全的玉米支付多少费用。本研究测量了人们对黄曲霉毒素的认识水平,调查了目前的黄曲霉毒素管理做法,并通过选择实验估计了尼日利亚家禽生产商和饲料加工厂购买黄曲霉毒素安全玉米的支付意愿。数据收集自272项口头调查,其中包括考察玉米购买决策的离散选择实验。结果表明,企业的比例,知道黄曲霉毒素被发现不同的国家。我们确定了尼日利亚家禽生产者和饲料加工厂的两个潜在类别,他们愿意为黄曲霉毒素浓度为10 ppb的玉米支付平均溢价4.9%和30.9%,相对于黄曲霉毒素浓度为20 ppb的玉米。平均而言,两个潜在类别都愿意为黄曲霉毒素浓度为4 ppb的玉米支付更高的溢价。有证据表明,潜在的班级成员,因此WTP,根据黄曲霉毒素的认识和不同的地理。凝胶分类d29;I15;O13
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信