The effect of auditor industry specialization and board independence on the cash flow reporting classification choices under IFRS: evidence from Taiwan

IF 4.3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Shuling Chiang, G. Kleinman, Picheng Lee
{"title":"The effect of auditor industry specialization and board independence on the cash flow reporting classification choices under IFRS: evidence from Taiwan","authors":"Shuling Chiang, G. Kleinman, Picheng Lee","doi":"10.1108/IJAIM-07-2019-0084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to explore the relationship between audit partner and firm industry specialization and board of director independence on the decision by Taiwanese firms to use International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) flexibility concerning reporting interest income and expense and dividends received in different sections of the statement of cash flows. This flexibility existed in Taiwan for the first time in 2013, the year that Taiwan switched from its own generally accepted accounting principle to IFRS.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing 2013 data for a sample of 1,227 firms, 354 of whom changed their reporting classification, this study examined the interaction effect of board independence and partner-level and firm-level auditor industry specialization on the cash flow reporting decision using logistic regression.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results show there is a substitute relationship between board independence and partner-level industry specialization on the change in cash flow reporting classification, but a complementary relationship between board independence and firm-level auditor specialization. Further, both partner-level and firm-level auditor industry specializations have a complementary (but negative) relationship with board independence as to whether the firm is likely to report interest expense paid in the operating or financing activities sections.\n\n\nPractical implications\nAn important implication is that knowing the levels of audit firm and partner specialization and how independent the board is, is useful for researchers and regulators in investigating auditor-client relationships and understanding the influences of variables investigated here on the outcome(s) of accounting policy and regulatory changes.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study improved the field’s understanding of the impacts of audit partner and firm specialization, board independence and relevant interactions on cash flow reporting choices.\n","PeriodicalId":46371,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting and Information Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting and Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-07-2019-0084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore the relationship between audit partner and firm industry specialization and board of director independence on the decision by Taiwanese firms to use International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) flexibility concerning reporting interest income and expense and dividends received in different sections of the statement of cash flows. This flexibility existed in Taiwan for the first time in 2013, the year that Taiwan switched from its own generally accepted accounting principle to IFRS. Design/methodology/approach Using 2013 data for a sample of 1,227 firms, 354 of whom changed their reporting classification, this study examined the interaction effect of board independence and partner-level and firm-level auditor industry specialization on the cash flow reporting decision using logistic regression. Findings The results show there is a substitute relationship between board independence and partner-level industry specialization on the change in cash flow reporting classification, but a complementary relationship between board independence and firm-level auditor specialization. Further, both partner-level and firm-level auditor industry specializations have a complementary (but negative) relationship with board independence as to whether the firm is likely to report interest expense paid in the operating or financing activities sections. Practical implications An important implication is that knowing the levels of audit firm and partner specialization and how independent the board is, is useful for researchers and regulators in investigating auditor-client relationships and understanding the influences of variables investigated here on the outcome(s) of accounting policy and regulatory changes. Originality/value This study improved the field’s understanding of the impacts of audit partner and firm specialization, board independence and relevant interactions on cash flow reporting choices.
审计行业专业化和董事会独立性对国际财务报告准则下现金流量报告分类选择的影响:来自台湾的证据
目的本研究旨在探讨审计合伙人、事务所行业专业化和董事会独立性对台湾公司采用国际财务报告准则(IFRS)灵活性报告现金流量表不同部分的利息收入、费用和股息的影响。这种灵活性在2013年首次出现在台湾,那一年台湾从自己的公认会计原则转向了国际财务报告准则。设计/方法/方法使用2013年1227家公司的样本数据,其中354家公司改变了报告分类,本研究使用逻辑回归检验了董事会独立性、合伙人级别和公司级别审计师行业专业化对现金流量报告决策的交互影响。结果表明:董事会独立性与合伙人层面的行业专业化对现金流量报告分类的影响存在替代关系,而董事会独立性与公司层面的审计师专业化之间存在互补关系。此外,合伙人级别和公司级别的审计师行业专业化与董事会独立性之间存在互补(但负)关系,即公司是否可能报告在运营或融资活动部分支付的利息费用。一个重要的启示是,了解审计事务所和合伙人的专业化水平以及董事会的独立性,对于研究人员和监管机构调查审计-客户关系以及理解本文所调查的变量对会计政策和监管变化结果的影响是有用的。独创性/价值本研究提高了该领域对审计合伙人和事务所专业化、董事会独立性和相关互动对现金流量报告选择的影响的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Accounting & Information Management focuses on publishing research in accounting, finance, and information management. It specifically emphasizes the interaction between these research areas on an international scale and within both the private and public sectors. The aim of the journal is to bridge the knowledge gap between researchers and practitioners by covering various issues that arise in the field. These include information systems, accounting information management, innovation and technology in accounting, accounting standards and reporting, and capital market efficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信