After Liberalism?

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Telos Pub Date : 2021-07-20 DOI:10.2307/j.ctt7rtpk
P. Gottfried
{"title":"After Liberalism?","authors":"P. Gottfried","doi":"10.2307/j.ctt7rtpk","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is natural that the appearance of Telos' 100th issue should evoke the same contentiousness among its editors that one finds in all the back issues. There is the predictable lively discussion whether Dialectic of the Enlightenment and other texts of choice for Telos continue to be relevant. Some also wonder whether the magazine still has — or ever had — a clear and defensible prise de position amid the political programs of this by now waning century. All this is, for me, profoundly ironic. For most of my life I have been an old-style European liberal and, in American politics, an unreconstructed Taft Republican. I have literally reeked of liberalism to the point of defending Max Weber's “value-free science” and Vilfredo Pareto's metodo sperimentale.","PeriodicalId":43573,"journal":{"name":"Telos","volume":"16 1","pages":"169 - 172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"103","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telos","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7rtpk","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 103

Abstract

It is natural that the appearance of Telos' 100th issue should evoke the same contentiousness among its editors that one finds in all the back issues. There is the predictable lively discussion whether Dialectic of the Enlightenment and other texts of choice for Telos continue to be relevant. Some also wonder whether the magazine still has — or ever had — a clear and defensible prise de position amid the political programs of this by now waning century. All this is, for me, profoundly ironic. For most of my life I have been an old-style European liberal and, in American politics, an unreconstructed Taft Republican. I have literally reeked of liberalism to the point of defending Max Weber's “value-free science” and Vilfredo Pareto's metodo sperimentale.
在自由主义?
《Telos》第100期的出现自然会引起编辑们的争论,就像在所有的后期杂志中一样。可以预见的是,关于启蒙辩证法和泰罗斯选择的其他文本是否仍然相关的热烈讨论。一些人还想知道,在这个日渐式微的世纪里,该杂志是否仍然——或者曾经——在政治项目中拥有一个明确的、可辩护的立场。对我来说,这一切都是非常讽刺的。在我生命中的大部分时间里,我一直是一个老式的欧洲自由主义者,在美国政治中,我是一个守旧的塔夫脱共和党人。我确实散发着自由主义的恶臭,以至于捍卫马克斯·韦伯的“价值自由科学”和维尔弗雷多·帕累托的“实验方法”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Telos
Telos Multiple-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信