UNCLES EX MACHINA: FAMILIAL EPIPHANY IN EURIPIDES’ ELECTRA

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
R. Andújar
{"title":"UNCLES EX MACHINA: FAMILIAL EPIPHANY IN EURIPIDES’ ELECTRA","authors":"R. Andújar","doi":"10.1017/rmu.2016.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the close of Euripides’ Electra, the Dioscuri suddenly appear ‘on high’ to their distraught niece and nephew, who have just killed their mother, the divine twins’ mortal sister. This is in fact the second longest extant deus ex machina (after the final scene in Hippolytus), and the only scene in which a tragedian attempts to resolve directly the aftermath of the matricide. In this article, I argue that Castor's and Polydeuces’ sudden apparition to Orestes and Electra constitutes a specialised point of intersection between the mortal and immortal realms in Greek tragedy: familial epiphany, an appearance by a god who has an especially intimate relationship with those on stage. Euripides’ focus on the familial divine as a category accentuates various contradictions inherent to both ancient Greek theology and dramaturgy. The Dioscuri are a living paradox, ambiguously traversing the space between dead heroes and gods, managing at the same time to occupy both. They oscillate uniquely between the mortal and immortal worlds, as different sources assign different fathers to each brother, and others speak of each one possessing divinity on alternate days. As I propose, the epiphany of these ambiguous brothers crystallises the problem of the gods’ physical presence in drama. Tragedy is the arena in which gods burst suddenly into the mortal realm, decisively and irrevocably altering human action. The physical divine thus tends to be both marginal and directorial, tasked with reining in the plot or directing its future course. The appearance of the familial divine, on the other hand, can in fact obscure the resolution and future direction of a play, undermining the authority of the tragic gods. In the specific case of Electra, I contend that the involvement of the Dioscuri, who are Electra's and Orestes’ maternal uncles, produces a sense of claustrophobia at the close of the play, which simultaneously denies the resolution that is expected from a deus ex machina while also revealing the pessimistic nature of what is typically considered a reassuringly ‘domestic’ and character driven drama.","PeriodicalId":43863,"journal":{"name":"RAMUS-CRITICAL STUDIES IN GREEK AND ROMAN LITERATURE","volume":"26 1","pages":"165 - 191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAMUS-CRITICAL STUDIES IN GREEK AND ROMAN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/rmu.2016.9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

At the close of Euripides’ Electra, the Dioscuri suddenly appear ‘on high’ to their distraught niece and nephew, who have just killed their mother, the divine twins’ mortal sister. This is in fact the second longest extant deus ex machina (after the final scene in Hippolytus), and the only scene in which a tragedian attempts to resolve directly the aftermath of the matricide. In this article, I argue that Castor's and Polydeuces’ sudden apparition to Orestes and Electra constitutes a specialised point of intersection between the mortal and immortal realms in Greek tragedy: familial epiphany, an appearance by a god who has an especially intimate relationship with those on stage. Euripides’ focus on the familial divine as a category accentuates various contradictions inherent to both ancient Greek theology and dramaturgy. The Dioscuri are a living paradox, ambiguously traversing the space between dead heroes and gods, managing at the same time to occupy both. They oscillate uniquely between the mortal and immortal worlds, as different sources assign different fathers to each brother, and others speak of each one possessing divinity on alternate days. As I propose, the epiphany of these ambiguous brothers crystallises the problem of the gods’ physical presence in drama. Tragedy is the arena in which gods burst suddenly into the mortal realm, decisively and irrevocably altering human action. The physical divine thus tends to be both marginal and directorial, tasked with reining in the plot or directing its future course. The appearance of the familial divine, on the other hand, can in fact obscure the resolution and future direction of a play, undermining the authority of the tragic gods. In the specific case of Electra, I contend that the involvement of the Dioscuri, who are Electra's and Orestes’ maternal uncles, produces a sense of claustrophobia at the close of the play, which simultaneously denies the resolution that is expected from a deus ex machina while also revealing the pessimistic nature of what is typically considered a reassuringly ‘domestic’ and character driven drama.
机械叔:欧里庇得斯的《伊莱克特拉》中的家族顿悟
在欧里庇得斯的《伊莱克特拉》的结尾,狄奥斯库里兄弟突然“高高在上”地出现在他们悲痛欲的侄女和侄子面前,他们刚刚杀死了他们的母亲,这对神圣的双胞胎的凡人妹妹。事实上,这是现存第二长的“解谜”(仅次于《希波吕忒斯》的最后一幕),也是唯一一个悲剧演员试图直接解决弑母事件后果的场景。在这篇文章中,我认为卡斯特和波吕都斯突然出现在俄瑞斯忒斯和伊莱克特拉面前,构成了希腊悲剧中凡人和不朽领域之间的一个特殊交叉点:家族顿悟,一个与舞台上的人有着特别亲密关系的神的出现。欧里庇德斯对家族神性的关注强调了古希腊神学和戏剧中固有的各种矛盾。迪奥斯库里是一个活生生的悖论,模糊地穿越死去的英雄和神之间的空间,同时设法占据两者。他们在凡人世界和不朽世界之间独特地振荡,因为不同的来源给每个兄弟分配了不同的父亲,其他人说每个人在交替的日子里拥有神性。正如我所提出的,这对模棱两可的兄弟的顿悟明确了戏剧中神的实际存在的问题。悲剧是诸神突然闯入凡人领域,决定性地、不可逆转地改变人类行为的舞台。因此,物质神倾向于边缘和导演,任务是控制情节或指导其未来的进程。另一方面,家族神的出现实际上会模糊戏剧的决心和未来的方向,破坏悲剧神的权威。在伊莱克特拉的具体案例中,我认为Dioscuri的参与,他们是伊莱克特拉和俄瑞斯忒斯的舅舅,在戏剧的结尾产生了一种幽闭恐惧症,这同时否认了人们对救世主的期望,同时也揭示了这种通常被认为是令人安心的“国内”和人物驱动的戏剧的悲观本质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信