Language assessment literacy: Understanding the construct from Norwegian EFL teachers’ perspective

IF 0.1 Q4 LINGUISTICS
Henrik Bøhn, Dina Tsagari
{"title":"Language assessment literacy: Understanding the construct from Norwegian EFL teachers’ perspective","authors":"Henrik Bøhn, Dina Tsagari","doi":"10.58379/unud5510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of what language assessment literacy (LAL) entails continues to preoccupy the research community. In the current study empirical evidence from Norway was gathered in order to inform our understanding of the construct. The focus of the investigation was twofold: First, it explored how Norwegian EFL teachers understand LAL. Secondly, it examined to what extent the same teachers found the dimensions in Taylor’s (2013) LAL model relevant in the Norwegian context. To that end semi-structured interviews were carried out with 10 teachers at the lower and upper secondary levels in Norway. The results showed that the teachers attributed a lot of weight to disciplinary competence and formative assessment, and they agreed with Taylor on several of her hypothesized dimensions, such as the importance given to language pedagogy. However, they also disagreed with some of the other dimensions, such as test-specific skills (e.g., how to design and validate multiple-choice tests), which they believed to be less relevant in the Norwegian context. The findings point to the contextualized nature of teacher LAL and provide important knowledge on how teacher LAL can be conceptualized and how Taylor’s model can be developed and refined.","PeriodicalId":29650,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Language Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Language Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58379/unud5510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The question of what language assessment literacy (LAL) entails continues to preoccupy the research community. In the current study empirical evidence from Norway was gathered in order to inform our understanding of the construct. The focus of the investigation was twofold: First, it explored how Norwegian EFL teachers understand LAL. Secondly, it examined to what extent the same teachers found the dimensions in Taylor’s (2013) LAL model relevant in the Norwegian context. To that end semi-structured interviews were carried out with 10 teachers at the lower and upper secondary levels in Norway. The results showed that the teachers attributed a lot of weight to disciplinary competence and formative assessment, and they agreed with Taylor on several of her hypothesized dimensions, such as the importance given to language pedagogy. However, they also disagreed with some of the other dimensions, such as test-specific skills (e.g., how to design and validate multiple-choice tests), which they believed to be less relevant in the Norwegian context. The findings point to the contextualized nature of teacher LAL and provide important knowledge on how teacher LAL can be conceptualized and how Taylor’s model can be developed and refined.
语言评价素养:从挪威英语教师的视角看语言评价素养的建构
语言评估素养(LAL)的问题一直是研究界关注的焦点。在目前的研究中,收集了来自挪威的经验证据,以告知我们对该结构的理解。调查的重点有两个:首先,它探讨了挪威英语教师如何理解LAL。其次,它检查了相同的教师在多大程度上发现泰勒(2013)LAL模型中的维度与挪威背景相关。为此目的,对挪威的10名初中和高中教师进行了半结构化访谈。结果显示,教师们非常重视学科能力和形成性评估,他们同意泰勒在几个假设维度上的观点,比如对语言教学法的重视。然而,他们也不同意其他一些方面,例如特定于考试的技能(例如,如何设计和验证多项选择题考试),他们认为这与挪威的情况不太相关。这些发现指出了教师学习能力的情境化本质,并为如何将教师学习能力概念化以及如何发展和完善泰勒的模型提供了重要的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信