Social enterprise housing supply chains for resource-constrained communities: a complexity lens approach

IF 2.4 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Tillmann Boehme, Joshua Fan, Thomas Birtchnell, J. Aitken, N. Turner, E. Deakins
{"title":"Social enterprise housing supply chains for resource-constrained communities: a complexity lens approach","authors":"Tillmann Boehme, Joshua Fan, Thomas Birtchnell, J. Aitken, N. Turner, E. Deakins","doi":"10.1108/scm-02-2023-0113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nDelivering housing to resource-constrained communities (RCCs) is a complex process beset with difficulties. The purpose of this study is to use a complexity lens to examine the approach taken by a social enterprise (SE) in Australia to develop and manage a housebuilding supply chain for RCCs.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe research team used a longitudinal case study approach from 2017 to 2022, which used mixed methods to understand the phenomenon and gain an in-depth understanding of the complex issues and problem-solving undertaken by an SE start-up.\n\n\nFindings\nBalancing mission logic with commercial viability is challenging for an SE. The supply chain solution that evolved accommodated the particulars of geography and the needs of many stakeholders, including the end-user community and government sponsors. Extensive and time-consuming socialisation and customisation led to a successful technical design and sustainable supply chain operation.\n\n\nPractical implications\nAnalysing supply chain intricacies via a complexity framework is valuable for scholars and practitioners, assisting in designing and developing supply chain configurations and understanding their dynamics. Meeting the housing construction needs of RCCs requires the SE to place societal focus at the centre of the supply chain rather than merely being a system output. The developed business model complements the engineering solution to empower a community-led housing construction supply chain.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis longitudinal case study contributes to knowledge by providing rich insights into the roles of SEs and how they develop and operate supply chains to fit with the needs of RCCs. Adding a contextual response dimension to an established complexity framework helped to explain how hybrid organisations balance commercial viability demands with social mission logic by amending traditional supply chain and governance practices. The case provides insights into supply chain configuration, needed changes and potential impacts when an SE as a focal actor inserts into a traditional for-profit construction supply chain.\n","PeriodicalId":43857,"journal":{"name":"Operations and Supply Chain Management-An International Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations and Supply Chain Management-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-02-2023-0113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Delivering housing to resource-constrained communities (RCCs) is a complex process beset with difficulties. The purpose of this study is to use a complexity lens to examine the approach taken by a social enterprise (SE) in Australia to develop and manage a housebuilding supply chain for RCCs. Design/methodology/approach The research team used a longitudinal case study approach from 2017 to 2022, which used mixed methods to understand the phenomenon and gain an in-depth understanding of the complex issues and problem-solving undertaken by an SE start-up. Findings Balancing mission logic with commercial viability is challenging for an SE. The supply chain solution that evolved accommodated the particulars of geography and the needs of many stakeholders, including the end-user community and government sponsors. Extensive and time-consuming socialisation and customisation led to a successful technical design and sustainable supply chain operation. Practical implications Analysing supply chain intricacies via a complexity framework is valuable for scholars and practitioners, assisting in designing and developing supply chain configurations and understanding their dynamics. Meeting the housing construction needs of RCCs requires the SE to place societal focus at the centre of the supply chain rather than merely being a system output. The developed business model complements the engineering solution to empower a community-led housing construction supply chain. Originality/value This longitudinal case study contributes to knowledge by providing rich insights into the roles of SEs and how they develop and operate supply chains to fit with the needs of RCCs. Adding a contextual response dimension to an established complexity framework helped to explain how hybrid organisations balance commercial viability demands with social mission logic by amending traditional supply chain and governance practices. The case provides insights into supply chain configuration, needed changes and potential impacts when an SE as a focal actor inserts into a traditional for-profit construction supply chain.
资源受限社区的社会企业住房供应链:复杂视角方法
向资源受限社区(rcc)提供住房是一个充满困难的复杂过程。本研究的目的是使用复杂性的镜头来检查澳大利亚的社会企业(SE)为rcc开发和管理房屋建筑供应链所采取的方法。设计/方法/方法研究团队采用纵向案例研究方法,从2017年到2022年,使用混合方法来理解这一现象,并深入了解一家初创企业所面临的复杂问题和解决问题的方法。对于SE来说,平衡任务逻辑和商业可行性是一项挑战。不断发展的供应链解决方案适应了地理的特殊性和许多利益相关者的需求,包括最终用户社区和政府赞助者。广泛而耗时的社会化和定制导致了成功的技术设计和可持续的供应链运作。实际意义通过复杂性框架分析供应链的复杂性对学者和实践者来说是有价值的,有助于设计和开发供应链配置并理解其动态。满足rcc的住房建设需求要求SE将社会焦点置于供应链的中心,而不仅仅是系统输出。开发的商业模式补充了工程解决方案,以增强社区主导的住房建设供应链。原创性/价值这个纵向的案例研究通过提供丰富的见解来了解企业的角色,以及他们如何开发和运营供应链以适应rcc的需求,从而有助于知识。将上下文响应维度添加到已建立的复杂性框架中,有助于解释混合型组织如何通过修改传统供应链和治理实践来平衡商业可行性需求与社会使命逻辑。该案例提供了对供应链配置、所需变更和潜在影响的见解,当企业作为焦点参与者插入传统的营利性建筑供应链时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
27.80%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信