The interplay of entrepreneurial ecosystem actors and conditions in FinTech ecosystems: An empirical analysis

IF 2.3 Q3 BUSINESS
Mari Avarmaa, Lasse Torkkeli, Laivi Laidroo, Ekaterina Koroleva
{"title":"The interplay of entrepreneurial ecosystem actors and conditions in FinTech ecosystems: An empirical analysis","authors":"Mari Avarmaa, Lasse Torkkeli, Laivi Laidroo, Ekaterina Koroleva","doi":"10.7341/20221843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of actors and ecosystem conditions in the development of the FinTech ecosystems in Tallinn and Moscow. METHODOLOGY: The study develops a framework for investigating entrepreneurial ecosystems, combining ecosystem actors with ecosystem conditions. The framework is implemented through a comparative case study of FinTech ecosystems in Tallinn and Moscow, with data drawn from 35 semi-structured interviews and processed by means of thematic analysis. The primary data is supplemented with data from secondary sources. FINDINGS: The findings show how the ecosystem conditions and actors are interdependent in the FinTech ecosystems. Tallinn is an example of a strong entrepreneurial culture with its small market, advanced technological infrastructure, and talent, which leads to the dominance of the FinTech start-ups and the emergence of an active FinTech cluster organization. In Moscow, the institutional context, concentration of financial capital, and its large home market with a loyal customer base limit start-ups’ ability to grow and form the ecosystem. IMPLICATIONS: The study contributes to the literature on entrepreneurial ecosystems and emerging technologies by integrating the streams of research on entrepreneurial ecosystems and FinTech ecosystems, combining FinTech actors with entrepreneurial ecosystem conditions. It also highlights the implications of variations of entrepreneurial culture, characteristics of the domestic demand and formal institutions in the development of ecosystems. It demonstrates that ecosystem conditions are likely to contribute to the emergence of the dominant actor in a particular ecosystem. Our results also suggest that when aiming to develop the FinTech ecosystem in a city, the support given to FinTech cluster organizations is essential. Facilitating university–industry cooperation through the cluster organizations or direct partnerships can contribute to the development of FinTech ecosystems. ORIGINALITY AND VALUE: To our knowledge, this is the first study to illustrate how specific entrepreneurial ecosystem conditions lead to configurations with different types of ecosystem actors, and to illustrate how specific ecosystem conditions impact the way in which actors develop and operate and how the ecosystem configuration is structured. These have been notable omissions in extant entrepreneurial ecosystem research until now. The present study also illustrates sectoral variations in entrepreneurial ecosystems while highlighting the distinct features of emerging ecosystems. It also contributes to the emerging literature on FinTech ecosystems through a comparative empirical perspective, thereby enhancing understanding of local conditions necessary for developing and maintaining FinTech ecosystems in different contexts.","PeriodicalId":44596,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Innovation","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7341/20221843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of actors and ecosystem conditions in the development of the FinTech ecosystems in Tallinn and Moscow. METHODOLOGY: The study develops a framework for investigating entrepreneurial ecosystems, combining ecosystem actors with ecosystem conditions. The framework is implemented through a comparative case study of FinTech ecosystems in Tallinn and Moscow, with data drawn from 35 semi-structured interviews and processed by means of thematic analysis. The primary data is supplemented with data from secondary sources. FINDINGS: The findings show how the ecosystem conditions and actors are interdependent in the FinTech ecosystems. Tallinn is an example of a strong entrepreneurial culture with its small market, advanced technological infrastructure, and talent, which leads to the dominance of the FinTech start-ups and the emergence of an active FinTech cluster organization. In Moscow, the institutional context, concentration of financial capital, and its large home market with a loyal customer base limit start-ups’ ability to grow and form the ecosystem. IMPLICATIONS: The study contributes to the literature on entrepreneurial ecosystems and emerging technologies by integrating the streams of research on entrepreneurial ecosystems and FinTech ecosystems, combining FinTech actors with entrepreneurial ecosystem conditions. It also highlights the implications of variations of entrepreneurial culture, characteristics of the domestic demand and formal institutions in the development of ecosystems. It demonstrates that ecosystem conditions are likely to contribute to the emergence of the dominant actor in a particular ecosystem. Our results also suggest that when aiming to develop the FinTech ecosystem in a city, the support given to FinTech cluster organizations is essential. Facilitating university–industry cooperation through the cluster organizations or direct partnerships can contribute to the development of FinTech ecosystems. ORIGINALITY AND VALUE: To our knowledge, this is the first study to illustrate how specific entrepreneurial ecosystem conditions lead to configurations with different types of ecosystem actors, and to illustrate how specific ecosystem conditions impact the way in which actors develop and operate and how the ecosystem configuration is structured. These have been notable omissions in extant entrepreneurial ecosystem research until now. The present study also illustrates sectoral variations in entrepreneurial ecosystems while highlighting the distinct features of emerging ecosystems. It also contributes to the emerging literature on FinTech ecosystems through a comparative empirical perspective, thereby enhancing understanding of local conditions necessary for developing and maintaining FinTech ecosystems in different contexts.
金融科技生态系统中创业生态系统行动者与条件的相互作用:实证分析
目的:本研究的目的是调查参与者和生态系统条件在塔林和莫斯科金融科技生态系统发展中的作用。方法:本研究开发了一个框架来调查创业生态系统,将生态系统参与者与生态系统条件相结合。该框架通过塔林和莫斯科金融科技生态系统的比较案例研究来实施,数据来自35个半结构化访谈,并通过专题分析的方式进行处理。原始资料由第二手资料补充。研究结果:研究结果表明,金融科技生态系统中的生态系统条件和参与者是相互依存的。塔林是一个强大的创业文化的例子,它的小市场,先进的技术基础设施和人才,这导致了金融科技初创企业的主导地位和活跃的金融科技集群组织的出现。在莫斯科,制度背景、金融资本的集中以及拥有忠实客户群的庞大国内市场限制了初创企业成长和形成生态系统的能力。启示:本研究通过整合创业生态系统和金融科技生态系统的研究流,将金融科技参与者与创业生态系统条件结合起来,为创业生态系统和新兴技术的研究贡献了文献。它还强调了企业文化的变化、国内需求的特点和生态系统发展中的正式制度的影响。它表明,生态系统条件可能有助于特定生态系统中主导行为体的出现。我们的研究结果还表明,当一个城市的目标是发展金融科技生态系统时,对金融科技集群组织的支持是必不可少的。通过集群组织或直接伙伴关系促进校企合作,有助于金融科技生态系统的发展。原创性和价值:据我们所知,这是第一次研究具体的创业生态系统条件如何导致不同类型生态系统参与者的配置,并说明具体的生态系统条件如何影响参与者的发展和运作方式,以及生态系统配置是如何构建的。到目前为止,这些都是现有创业生态系统研究中值得注意的遗漏。本研究还说明了创业生态系统的部门差异,同时突出了新兴生态系统的独特特征。它还通过比较实证的角度为金融科技生态系统的新兴文献做出了贡献,从而增强了对在不同背景下发展和维护金融科技生态系统所需的当地条件的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
20
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信