The Barriers to the CLE Practice in Russia, in Comparison Light with the European Union and the United Kingdom

A. Kislova
{"title":"The Barriers to the CLE Practice in Russia, in Comparison Light with the European Union and the United Kingdom","authors":"A. Kislova","doi":"10.19164/ijcle.v30i2.1345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical legal education (CLE) is commonly used to refer to a law teaching method that incorporates experiential learning aimed at development of students’ legal knowledge and skills. At the same time, CLE also has social justice mission as it serves the needs of vulnerable members of society. Like any other teaching methods, CLE requires a specific environment and factors to be in place to embrace its mission at maximum level and to allow its learners to reach pre-defined learning outcomes. While researching in three Western European university legal clinics, and then studying the legal clinics in Russia, I have reached the conclusion that CLE in Russia cannot fully exploit its mission and reach its objectives. While some barriers that prevent Russian universities to effectively run CLE are obvious, there are also the ones which will be new to a reader. Below I discuss the factors that could be considered as barriers preventing CLE practice in Russia to be effective in driving for its mission and goals, both from educational and social justice perspectives.","PeriodicalId":31794,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19164/ijcle.v30i2.1345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical legal education (CLE) is commonly used to refer to a law teaching method that incorporates experiential learning aimed at development of students’ legal knowledge and skills. At the same time, CLE also has social justice mission as it serves the needs of vulnerable members of society. Like any other teaching methods, CLE requires a specific environment and factors to be in place to embrace its mission at maximum level and to allow its learners to reach pre-defined learning outcomes. While researching in three Western European university legal clinics, and then studying the legal clinics in Russia, I have reached the conclusion that CLE in Russia cannot fully exploit its mission and reach its objectives. While some barriers that prevent Russian universities to effectively run CLE are obvious, there are also the ones which will be new to a reader. Below I discuss the factors that could be considered as barriers preventing CLE practice in Russia to be effective in driving for its mission and goals, both from educational and social justice perspectives.
以欧盟和英国为对照,分析俄罗斯CLE实践的障碍
临床法律教育(CLE)通常是指一种结合体验式学习的法律教学方法,旨在培养学生的法律知识和技能。同时,CLE也有社会正义的使命,因为它服务于社会弱势群体的需求。像任何其他教学方法一样,CLE需要一个特定的环境和因素来最大程度地接受它的使命,并允许学习者达到预定的学习成果。通过对三所西欧大学法律诊所的研究,再到对俄罗斯法律诊所的研究,我得出结论,俄罗斯CLE不能充分发挥其使命,达到其目标。虽然一些阻碍俄罗斯大学有效开展CLE的障碍是显而易见的,但也有一些对读者来说是新的。下面,我将从教育和社会公正的角度,讨论可被视为阻碍俄罗斯CLE实践有效推动其使命和目标的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信