K. Isezuo, A. Adamu, F. Jiya, T. Yusuf, S. Um, N. Jiya, B. Onankpa, P. Ibitoye, M. Ugege, B. I. Garba
{"title":"Quality of hospital admission documentation: A study in an emergency paediatric unit of a tertiary hospital in Nigeria","authors":"K. Isezuo, A. Adamu, F. Jiya, T. Yusuf, S. Um, N. Jiya, B. Onankpa, P. Ibitoye, M. Ugege, B. I. Garba","doi":"10.5897/AJMHS2018.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medical documentation, in addition to being a legal and research tool, is vital in providing quality patient care. In Nigeria, hand written documentation without proforma, is the norm. We assessed the quality of doctors’ documentation of children admitted into Emergency Paediatrics Unit (EPU), Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital (UDUTH). A 3-month cross-sectional study of admission records by different cadre of doctors for children admitted into the EPU between March and May 2016. A checklist was used to assess the quality of documentation. Data was analysed with SPSS version 22. Of the 191 patients’ clerking studied, 63 (33%) indicated the doctors’ cadre. The patients’ name written on the first page in 168 (88%), but only 31 (16.2%) indicated name on subsequent pages. Date and time of consultation were written in 183 (95.8%) and 61 (31.9%) respectively. Writing was legible in (174) 91.1%, with counter-signing of cancellations in 19 (9.9%). Examination findings documented included blood pressure in 18 (9.4%), pulse rate in 179 (93.7%), respiratory rate in 179 (93.7%) and temperature in 184 (96.3%). This study demonstrates the need for improvement in quality of paediatrics emergency documentation. Continuing medical education (CME) on this is essential. \n \n Key words: Quality, admission, documentation, emergency, paediatrics, Sokoto.","PeriodicalId":93249,"journal":{"name":"African journal of medical and health sciences","volume":"525 1","pages":"25-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African journal of medical and health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMHS2018.0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Medical documentation, in addition to being a legal and research tool, is vital in providing quality patient care. In Nigeria, hand written documentation without proforma, is the norm. We assessed the quality of doctors’ documentation of children admitted into Emergency Paediatrics Unit (EPU), Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital (UDUTH). A 3-month cross-sectional study of admission records by different cadre of doctors for children admitted into the EPU between March and May 2016. A checklist was used to assess the quality of documentation. Data was analysed with SPSS version 22. Of the 191 patients’ clerking studied, 63 (33%) indicated the doctors’ cadre. The patients’ name written on the first page in 168 (88%), but only 31 (16.2%) indicated name on subsequent pages. Date and time of consultation were written in 183 (95.8%) and 61 (31.9%) respectively. Writing was legible in (174) 91.1%, with counter-signing of cancellations in 19 (9.9%). Examination findings documented included blood pressure in 18 (9.4%), pulse rate in 179 (93.7%), respiratory rate in 179 (93.7%) and temperature in 184 (96.3%). This study demonstrates the need for improvement in quality of paediatrics emergency documentation. Continuing medical education (CME) on this is essential.
Key words: Quality, admission, documentation, emergency, paediatrics, Sokoto.
医疗文件除了是一种法律和研究工具外,对于提供高质量的病人护理至关重要。在尼日利亚,没有形式的手写文件是常态。我们评估了乌斯马努丹福迪约大学教学医院儿科急诊科(EPU)收治儿童的医生记录的质量。对2016年3月至5月EPU收治儿童的不同骨干医生的住院记录进行为期3个月的横断面研究。使用检查表来评估文件的质量。数据分析采用SPSS version 22。在所研究的191例患者中,63例(33%)为医生干部。168例(88%)患者的名字写在第一页,但只有31例(16.2%)患者的名字写在后续页。183例(95.8%)和61例(31.9%)分别填写咨询日期和时间。其中(174)的文字清晰可辨,占91.1%,其中19(9.9%)有会签取消。记录的检查结果包括18例血压(9.4%)、179例脉搏(93.7%)、179例呼吸(93.7%)和184例体温(96.3%)。本研究表明需要提高儿科急诊文件的质量。这方面的继续医学教育(CME)是必不可少的。关键词:质量,入院,文件,急诊,儿科,索科托。