Summixis, Spermata and Nous: Anaxagoras’ pluralistic Ontology

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
Claudia Rosciglione
{"title":"Summixis, Spermata and Nous: Anaxagoras’ pluralistic Ontology","authors":"Claudia Rosciglione","doi":"10.7408/EPKN.V8I1.174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to provide an interpretation of Anaxagoras’ thought as a form of Philosophy of Nature which, unlike Parmenides’, admits of the coming-to-be and the passing-away which are meant as the continuous mixture and separation of the natural matter. As opposed to a platonistic and metaphisical  interpretation, this paper tries to outline an Anaxagorean cosmology, according to which the physis is accounted of as unity that stems from multiplicity, that is from the summixis of manifold different ingredients which keep on being in continuous motion.  This paper shows that such an interpretation of Anaxagoras’ nous can be consistent with an anti-teleological and anti-anthropomorphic view of nature; this interpretation moves away from the classical one of Zeller. An anti-metaphysical construal of nous is provided that considers it mainly as a regulatory principle that causes the originary mixture to move. This mixture would be only organized in such a way to enable it to preserve its own manifold character whithin a continuous dynamic process, which the nature itself is made of.","PeriodicalId":40097,"journal":{"name":"Epekeina-International Journal of Ontology History and Critics","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epekeina-International Journal of Ontology History and Critics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7408/EPKN.V8I1.174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to provide an interpretation of Anaxagoras’ thought as a form of Philosophy of Nature which, unlike Parmenides’, admits of the coming-to-be and the passing-away which are meant as the continuous mixture and separation of the natural matter. As opposed to a platonistic and metaphisical  interpretation, this paper tries to outline an Anaxagorean cosmology, according to which the physis is accounted of as unity that stems from multiplicity, that is from the summixis of manifold different ingredients which keep on being in continuous motion.  This paper shows that such an interpretation of Anaxagoras’ nous can be consistent with an anti-teleological and anti-anthropomorphic view of nature; this interpretation moves away from the classical one of Zeller. An anti-metaphysical construal of nous is provided that considers it mainly as a regulatory principle that causes the originary mixture to move. This mixture would be only organized in such a way to enable it to preserve its own manifold character whithin a continuous dynamic process, which the nature itself is made of.
本文的目的是为阿那克萨哥拉的思想提供一种解释,作为自然哲学的一种形式,与巴门尼德的不同,阿那克萨哥拉的思想承认出生和死亡,这意味着自然物质的连续混合和分离。与柏拉图主义和形而上学的解释相反,本文试图勾勒出一种阿那克萨哥德宇宙论,根据这种宇宙论,物理学被认为是源于多样性的统一,即来自不断运动的多种不同成分的总和。本文表明,这种对阿那萨哥拉的理性的解释可以与反目的论和反拟人化的自然观相一致;这种解释偏离了泽勒的经典解释。提供了一种反形而上学的理性解释,认为它主要是一种使原始混合物移动的调节原则。这种混合只能以这样一种方式组织,使它能够在一个连续的动态过程中保持自己的多种特征,这是自然本身构成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信