Transcranial Doppler in acute stroke management – A “real-time” bed-side guide to reperfusion and collateral flow

Christopher Levi , Hossein Zareie , Mark Parsons
{"title":"Transcranial Doppler in acute stroke management – A “real-time” bed-side guide to reperfusion and collateral flow","authors":"Christopher Levi ,&nbsp;Hossein Zareie ,&nbsp;Mark Parsons","doi":"10.1016/j.permed.2012.02.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Assessment of cerebral hemodynamics with transcranial Doppler (TCD) can provide real-time, bed-side assessment of important prognostic variables in acute stroke such as the status of collateral flow and vessel recanalization status. In acute middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion, anterior cerebral artery (ACA) flow diversion (FD) is correlated with leptomeningeal collateral flow and may be a clinically useful prognostic indicator. Continuous TCD monitoring of MCA recanalization may also provide useful prognostic information including changes in flow pattern and the occurrence of microembolic signals (MES). We present studies examining associations between ACA FD, MCA recanalization and MES patterns on the characteristics of ischemia and infarction in acute MCA stroke.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients studied were consecutive sub-6<!--> <!-->h from onset internal carotid artery (ICA) territory ischemic stroke cases. A subset of these cases with MCA occlusion were studied with 2<!--> <!-->h of continuous MCA monitoring. All patients underwent baseline multimodal computed tomographic (CT) scanning, baseline diagnostic TCD, and 24<!--> <!-->h post stroke magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. All MCA occlusion patients studied with continuous monitoring were treated with intravenous thrombolysis. ACA flow diversion was defined as ipsilateral mean velocity of 30% or greater than the contralateral artery. Recanalization status was assessed using the Thrombolysis In Brain ischemic (TIBI) grading system and MES counted “off-line” by experienced observers. Leptomeningeal collateralisation (LMC) was graded on CT angiography. Infarct core and penumbral volumes were defined using CT perfusion thresholds. Infarct volume, reperfusion, and vessel status were measured at 24<!--> <!-->h using MR techniques. In patients undergoing recanalization monitoring, comparison was made between those with and without major reperfusion. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess for any associations between ACA flow diversion, TIBI grades and MES on infarction controlling for other important clinical variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><em>Flow diversion</em>: 53 patients qualified for FD analysis. ACA FD was associated with good collateral flow on CT angiography (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) and was an independent predictor of admission infarct core volume (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001), and 24<!--> <!-->h infarct volume (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). The likelihood of a favourable outcome (modified Rankin score 0–2) was higher (Odds ratio<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->27.5, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) in those with flow diversion.</p><p><em>Recanalization monitoring</em>: 27 patients with MCA occlusion treated with intravenous thrombolysis were included in the analysis of recanalization patterns (16 cases with major reperfusion, 11 cases of non-reperfusion). Major TIBI grade improvement (<em>Δ</em> <!-->≥<!--> <!-->3 grades overall) was associated with major reperfusion (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.04) excellent 90 day clinical outcome (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.03), improvement in clinical outcome at 24<!--> <!-->h (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.049) and attenuated infarct growth (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.06). MES did not associate with reperfusion status or outcome variables.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ACA FD is independently associated with the smaller infarction volumes and more favourable 90 day clinical outcome. Flow diversion may provide enhanced perfusion of ischemic tissue, offering some protection against infarct expansion and “buying-time” for effective reperfusion and tissue salvage.</p><p>Major TIBI grade improvement associates with major reperfusion, favourable 24<!--> <!-->h and 90 day clinical outcomes along with a trend to smaller infarct volumes in patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis.</p><p>Acute bedside transcranial Doppler assessment of ACA FD and recanalization aids prognostication and therapeutic decision making in acute stroke.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101010,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"Pages 185-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.permed.2012.02.044","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211968X12000514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction

Assessment of cerebral hemodynamics with transcranial Doppler (TCD) can provide real-time, bed-side assessment of important prognostic variables in acute stroke such as the status of collateral flow and vessel recanalization status. In acute middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion, anterior cerebral artery (ACA) flow diversion (FD) is correlated with leptomeningeal collateral flow and may be a clinically useful prognostic indicator. Continuous TCD monitoring of MCA recanalization may also provide useful prognostic information including changes in flow pattern and the occurrence of microembolic signals (MES). We present studies examining associations between ACA FD, MCA recanalization and MES patterns on the characteristics of ischemia and infarction in acute MCA stroke.

Methods

Patients studied were consecutive sub-6 h from onset internal carotid artery (ICA) territory ischemic stroke cases. A subset of these cases with MCA occlusion were studied with 2 h of continuous MCA monitoring. All patients underwent baseline multimodal computed tomographic (CT) scanning, baseline diagnostic TCD, and 24 h post stroke magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. All MCA occlusion patients studied with continuous monitoring were treated with intravenous thrombolysis. ACA flow diversion was defined as ipsilateral mean velocity of 30% or greater than the contralateral artery. Recanalization status was assessed using the Thrombolysis In Brain ischemic (TIBI) grading system and MES counted “off-line” by experienced observers. Leptomeningeal collateralisation (LMC) was graded on CT angiography. Infarct core and penumbral volumes were defined using CT perfusion thresholds. Infarct volume, reperfusion, and vessel status were measured at 24 h using MR techniques. In patients undergoing recanalization monitoring, comparison was made between those with and without major reperfusion. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess for any associations between ACA flow diversion, TIBI grades and MES on infarction controlling for other important clinical variables.

Results

Flow diversion: 53 patients qualified for FD analysis. ACA FD was associated with good collateral flow on CT angiography (p < 0.001) and was an independent predictor of admission infarct core volume (p < 0.001), and 24 h infarct volume (p < 0.001). The likelihood of a favourable outcome (modified Rankin score 0–2) was higher (Odds ratio = 27.5, p < 0.001) in those with flow diversion.

Recanalization monitoring: 27 patients with MCA occlusion treated with intravenous thrombolysis were included in the analysis of recanalization patterns (16 cases with major reperfusion, 11 cases of non-reperfusion). Major TIBI grade improvement (Δ  3 grades overall) was associated with major reperfusion (p = 0.04) excellent 90 day clinical outcome (p = 0.03), improvement in clinical outcome at 24 h (p = 0.049) and attenuated infarct growth (p = 0.06). MES did not associate with reperfusion status or outcome variables.

Conclusions

ACA FD is independently associated with the smaller infarction volumes and more favourable 90 day clinical outcome. Flow diversion may provide enhanced perfusion of ischemic tissue, offering some protection against infarct expansion and “buying-time” for effective reperfusion and tissue salvage.

Major TIBI grade improvement associates with major reperfusion, favourable 24 h and 90 day clinical outcomes along with a trend to smaller infarct volumes in patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis.

Acute bedside transcranial Doppler assessment of ACA FD and recanalization aids prognostication and therapeutic decision making in acute stroke.

经颅多普勒在急性脑卒中治疗中的应用——对再灌注和侧支血流的“实时”床边指导
经颅多普勒(TCD)评估脑血流动力学可以实时、床边评估急性脑卒中的重要预后变量,如侧支血流状态和血管再通状态。在急性大脑中动脉(MCA)闭塞中,大脑前动脉(ACA)血流转移(FD)与脑膜侧支血流相关,可能是临床有用的预后指标。连续TCD监测MCA再通也可以提供有用的预后信息,包括血流模式的变化和微栓塞信号(MES)的发生。我们提出了研究ACA - FD、MCA再通和MES模式对急性MCA卒中缺血和梗死特征的关系。方法研究的患者为颈内动脉(ICA)区域缺血性脑卒中患者。对这些MCA闭塞的病例进行2小时的连续MCA监测。所有患者均接受了基线多模态计算机断层扫描(CT)、基线诊断TCD和卒中后24小时磁共振(MR)成像。所有持续监测的MCA闭塞患者均接受静脉溶栓治疗。ACA分流被定义为同侧平均流速大于或等于对侧动脉的30%。使用脑缺血溶栓(TIBI)分级系统评估再通状态,并由经验丰富的观察员“离线”计算MES。轻脑膜侧支(LMC)在CT血管造影上分级。用CT灌注阈值确定梗死核和半影区体积。24小时用MR技术测量梗死体积、再灌注和血管状态。在接受再通监测的患者中,比较有和没有大再灌注的患者。采用多变量回归分析来评估ACA血流分流、TIBI分级和MES对梗死的影响之间的关联,并控制其他重要的临床变量。结果分流:53例患者符合FD分析。ACA FD与CT血管造影侧支血流良好相关(p <0.001),是入院梗死核心体积的独立预测因子(p <0.001), 24小时梗死体积(p <0.001)。获得有利结果的可能性(修正Rankin评分0-2)较高(优势比= 27.5,p <0.001)。再通监测:27例经静脉溶栓治疗的中动脉闭塞患者进行再通模式分析(主要再灌注16例,非再灌注11例)。TIBI等级的主要改善(Δ总体≥3级)与主要的再灌注(p = 0.04)、90天的良好临床结果(p = 0.03)、24小时临床结果的改善(p = 0.049)和梗死生长的减弱(p = 0.06)相关。MES与再灌注状态或结果变量无关。结论saca FD与较小的梗死体积和较好的90天临床预后独立相关。血流转移可以增强缺血组织的灌注,对梗死扩张提供一定的保护,为有效的再灌注和组织挽救提供“争取时间”。TIBI分级的主要改善与主要的再灌注、有利的24小时和90天临床结果以及静脉溶栓治疗患者梗死体积变小的趋势相关。急性床边经颅多普勒评估ACA、FD和再通有助于急性脑卒中的预后和治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信