Evaluation and Assessment of Existing Design Codes and Standards for Building Construction

IF 1.2 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Diman N. Abdulqader, Dawood S. Atrushi
{"title":"Evaluation and Assessment of Existing Design Codes and Standards for Building Construction","authors":"Diman N. Abdulqader, Dawood S. Atrushi","doi":"10.14500/aro.10983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building design codes (BDC) are used to control the construction industry in general and building design in particular. The BDC offers the construction sector with a standard language and set of requirements. There are several BDCs developed and utilized for construction purposes throughout the world. Certain design codes are employed in structural design to assure the structure’s health and safety, as well as its cost-effectiveness. It also assures that the structure is sufficiently sturdy to endure all potential climatic conditions, bear its intended load, and is integrated to ensure effective use of building materials and resources. This research aims to compare various building construction design codes to identify and explore the most appropriate standard in terms of safe design, economics, and availability of details. In Kurdistan and different parts of Iraq, many international companies have designed building structures with various codes during the past 20 years. This is a bad condition since the government has no control over the construction of the buildings, which includes both the code and the building materials. There is currently no overview of the design codes in use in Kurdistan, nor is it clear whether they are congruent with what students’ study in institutions.","PeriodicalId":8398,"journal":{"name":"ARO-THE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF KOYA UNIVERSITY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARO-THE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF KOYA UNIVERSITY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14500/aro.10983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building design codes (BDC) are used to control the construction industry in general and building design in particular. The BDC offers the construction sector with a standard language and set of requirements. There are several BDCs developed and utilized for construction purposes throughout the world. Certain design codes are employed in structural design to assure the structure’s health and safety, as well as its cost-effectiveness. It also assures that the structure is sufficiently sturdy to endure all potential climatic conditions, bear its intended load, and is integrated to ensure effective use of building materials and resources. This research aims to compare various building construction design codes to identify and explore the most appropriate standard in terms of safe design, economics, and availability of details. In Kurdistan and different parts of Iraq, many international companies have designed building structures with various codes during the past 20 years. This is a bad condition since the government has no control over the construction of the buildings, which includes both the code and the building materials. There is currently no overview of the design codes in use in Kurdistan, nor is it clear whether they are congruent with what students’ study in institutions.
现有建筑设计规范和标准的评价与评估
建筑设计规范(BDC)用于控制整个建筑行业,特别是建筑设计。BDC为建筑行业提供了一种标准语言和一套要求。在世界各地,有几个bdc被开发和用于建筑目的。在结构设计中采用一定的设计规范,以保证结构的健康和安全,以及其成本效益。它还确保结构足够坚固,以承受所有潜在的气候条件,承受其预期的负荷,并整合以确保有效利用建筑材料和资源。本研究旨在比较各种建筑结构设计规范,以确定和探索在安全设计、经济和细节可用性方面最合适的标准。在库尔德斯坦和伊拉克的不同地区,许多国际公司在过去的20年里设计了各种规范的建筑结构。这是一个糟糕的情况,因为政府对建筑的建造没有控制,包括建筑规范和建筑材料。目前没有关于库尔德斯坦使用的设计规范的概述,也不清楚它们是否与学生在机构中的学习一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ARO-THE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF KOYA UNIVERSITY
ARO-THE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF KOYA UNIVERSITY MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
33
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信