Landmarks in the Traumatic Brain Injury A Retrospective Study

Omar Al-Awar
{"title":"Landmarks in the Traumatic Brain Injury A Retrospective Study","authors":"Omar Al-Awar","doi":"10.48112/acmr.v4i1.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As one might expect, prehistoric brain surgery lacked knowledge of the anatomy, concept recognition of the disease, and comprehension of the disease’s origin. Unfortunately, failure to deeply understand these important principles delayed the progression of medical and surgical practice. Trepanation may be one of the oldest surgical interventions for which archaeological evidence is present. In the 1990s, standardized guidelines were developed and established for the management of traumatic brain injury. They included protocols regarding the pharmaceutical therapy and the management of increased ICP. Since then, research has improved TBI survival. Evidence of trepanation practice and other techniques in pre-Columbian Mesoamerica is demonstrated by the cranial remains in pre-Columbian burials, iconographic artworks, and post-colonial reports. The intellectual understanding of neurosurgery developed during the golden age of ancient Greece where no surgeon restricted oneself in strict to neurosurgery. Head injuries on the other hand appear to have been abundant; an expected result of wars and internecine conflict, as recorded by Herodotus, Thucydides, and Homer. Then and now, war remains the primary source of study material for the improvement of knowledge regarding head injuries. Surgical procedures for the management of even minimal lesions of the theca cranica, continued throughout the 16 th and 17 th Century. The surgical technique, with cross-shaped skin incision and the instruments used (trephine, lever, scalpel, gouge, protector of the meninx, etc.) would remain unchanged with respect to the past, but one should take notice at the improved quality of the materials and the ameliorated precision with which the instruments were made. Some instruments appeared to be real work of art, as shown by the findings now displayed in museums and in illustrations of the times. The most ancient technique of craniotomy involved using abrasive instruments to thin down the bony wall. Subsequently, circular incisions were progressively made deeper, or a series of small holes were made in a circular fashion. The remaining bony bridges between these small holes would be broken down. The two latter methods that continued to be used for a very long period depended on using metal instruments.","PeriodicalId":7266,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical Medical Research and Healthcare Delivery","volume":"49 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical Medical Research and Healthcare Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48112/acmr.v4i1.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As one might expect, prehistoric brain surgery lacked knowledge of the anatomy, concept recognition of the disease, and comprehension of the disease’s origin. Unfortunately, failure to deeply understand these important principles delayed the progression of medical and surgical practice. Trepanation may be one of the oldest surgical interventions for which archaeological evidence is present. In the 1990s, standardized guidelines were developed and established for the management of traumatic brain injury. They included protocols regarding the pharmaceutical therapy and the management of increased ICP. Since then, research has improved TBI survival. Evidence of trepanation practice and other techniques in pre-Columbian Mesoamerica is demonstrated by the cranial remains in pre-Columbian burials, iconographic artworks, and post-colonial reports. The intellectual understanding of neurosurgery developed during the golden age of ancient Greece where no surgeon restricted oneself in strict to neurosurgery. Head injuries on the other hand appear to have been abundant; an expected result of wars and internecine conflict, as recorded by Herodotus, Thucydides, and Homer. Then and now, war remains the primary source of study material for the improvement of knowledge regarding head injuries. Surgical procedures for the management of even minimal lesions of the theca cranica, continued throughout the 16 th and 17 th Century. The surgical technique, with cross-shaped skin incision and the instruments used (trephine, lever, scalpel, gouge, protector of the meninx, etc.) would remain unchanged with respect to the past, but one should take notice at the improved quality of the materials and the ameliorated precision with which the instruments were made. Some instruments appeared to be real work of art, as shown by the findings now displayed in museums and in illustrations of the times. The most ancient technique of craniotomy involved using abrasive instruments to thin down the bony wall. Subsequently, circular incisions were progressively made deeper, or a series of small holes were made in a circular fashion. The remaining bony bridges between these small holes would be broken down. The two latter methods that continued to be used for a very long period depended on using metal instruments.
外伤性脑损伤的标志物:回顾性研究
正如人们所预料的那样,史前的脑外科手术缺乏解剖学知识,对疾病的概念认识,以及对疾病起源的理解。不幸的是,未能深入理解这些重要的原则,延误了医学和外科实践的进展。钻孔可能是有考古证据的最古老的外科干预措施之一。在20世纪90年代,制定并建立了创伤性脑损伤管理的标准化指南。其中包括药物治疗和颅内压增高的处理方案。从那以后,研究提高了创伤性脑损伤的存活率。在前哥伦布时期的中美洲,钻孔实践和其他技术的证据可以通过前哥伦布时期墓葬中的颅骨遗骸、肖像艺术作品和后殖民时期的报告来证明。对神经外科学的认识在古希腊的黄金时代发展起来,当时没有一个外科医生严格地把自己局限于神经外科学。另一方面,头部受伤的人似乎很多;希罗多德、修昔底德和荷马所记载的战争和内部冲突的预期结果。过去和现在,战争仍然是研究材料的主要来源,以提高有关头部损伤的知识。在整个16和17世纪,外科手术治疗即使是最小的颅膜病变也一直在继续。手术技术,十字形皮肤切口和使用的器械(环钻,杠杆,手术刀,凿,脑膜保护器等)与过去相比将保持不变,但人们应该注意到材料质量的提高和器械制作精度的提高。一些乐器似乎是真正的艺术品,正如现在在博物馆展出的发现和当时的插图所显示的那样。最古老的开颅技术包括使用磨料工具使骨壁变薄。随后,圆形切口逐渐加深,或以圆形方式打一系列小孔。这些小孔之间剩余的骨桥会被破坏。后两种方法继续使用了很长一段时间,依赖于使用金属仪器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信