Small Group Discussion; Medical Students Perspective

L. Humayun
{"title":"Small Group Discussion; Medical Students Perspective","authors":"L. Humayun","doi":"10.47489/P000S342Z7501-5MC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Small group discussion teaching is a key instructional strategy being incorporated in medical education and is aimed at enhancing the personal, social and cognitive skills of students. Learning in small groups helps the students to enhance the acquisition, processing and retention of the medical knowledge.\n\nAims & Objectives: To assess medical student’s perception about small group discussion at a medical college.\n\nPlace and duration of study: September 2019 at the University College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Lahore.\n\nMaterial & Methods: This cross- sectional survey was conducted during September 2019 at University College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Lahore. Convenient sampling technique was used to obtain a sample of 322 students from the first three years of MBBS. A pre validated questionnaire was distributed and the students were asked to record their experience about small group discussion using a 5-point Likert scale. Data was analyzed by using SPSS22 and reported as percentage distribution and mean± s.d.\n\nResults: Regarding quality of these small group discussion sessions, 25.8% of the students appeared satisfied, 24.8% of the students were neutral, whereas, 49.4% of the students remained unsatisfied. When asked about being clear of their role in a SGD session, 55.9% of the students agreed, 22.7% were unclear and 21.4% neutral. As regards the benefits from small group sessions, majority (35.1%) agreed that activities taught lifelong learning, 8.7% strongly agreed. 27% remained neutral with 16.5% disagreeing and 12.75% strongly disagreeing. With reference to assessment of tutors, majority of students found SGD facilitators enthusiastic about process with 13.4% strongly agreeing and 36.3% agreeing, 28% stayed neutral while 9.6% disagreed and 12.75% strongly disagreed. Majority of students, (35.1% agreed, 13.4% strongly agreed) to that tutors just gave mini lecture, 27.6% responded neutral to statement while 11.2% disagreeing and 12.7% strongly disagreeing to the enquiry.\n\nConclusion: The study reveals that majority of the students are clear about their role in small group discussion sessions and majority (35.1%) also agreed that activities taught them lifelong learning. Tutors are helpful and enthusiastic, however, they provide plenty of information and need retraining for conducting a small group learning session.","PeriodicalId":20500,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Shaikh Zayed Medical Complex Lahore","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Shaikh Zayed Medical Complex Lahore","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47489/P000S342Z7501-5MC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Small group discussion teaching is a key instructional strategy being incorporated in medical education and is aimed at enhancing the personal, social and cognitive skills of students. Learning in small groups helps the students to enhance the acquisition, processing and retention of the medical knowledge. Aims & Objectives: To assess medical student’s perception about small group discussion at a medical college. Place and duration of study: September 2019 at the University College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Lahore. Material & Methods: This cross- sectional survey was conducted during September 2019 at University College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Lahore. Convenient sampling technique was used to obtain a sample of 322 students from the first three years of MBBS. A pre validated questionnaire was distributed and the students were asked to record their experience about small group discussion using a 5-point Likert scale. Data was analyzed by using SPSS22 and reported as percentage distribution and mean± s.d. Results: Regarding quality of these small group discussion sessions, 25.8% of the students appeared satisfied, 24.8% of the students were neutral, whereas, 49.4% of the students remained unsatisfied. When asked about being clear of their role in a SGD session, 55.9% of the students agreed, 22.7% were unclear and 21.4% neutral. As regards the benefits from small group sessions, majority (35.1%) agreed that activities taught lifelong learning, 8.7% strongly agreed. 27% remained neutral with 16.5% disagreeing and 12.75% strongly disagreeing. With reference to assessment of tutors, majority of students found SGD facilitators enthusiastic about process with 13.4% strongly agreeing and 36.3% agreeing, 28% stayed neutral while 9.6% disagreed and 12.75% strongly disagreed. Majority of students, (35.1% agreed, 13.4% strongly agreed) to that tutors just gave mini lecture, 27.6% responded neutral to statement while 11.2% disagreeing and 12.7% strongly disagreeing to the enquiry. Conclusion: The study reveals that majority of the students are clear about their role in small group discussion sessions and majority (35.1%) also agreed that activities taught them lifelong learning. Tutors are helpful and enthusiastic, however, they provide plenty of information and need retraining for conducting a small group learning session.
小组讨论;医学生视角
简介:小组讨论教学是医学教育中一种重要的教学策略,旨在提高学生的个人、社会和认知技能。小组学习有助于增强学生对医学知识的获取、加工和记忆。目的与目的:评估某医学院医学生对小组讨论的看法。学习地点和时间:2019年9月在拉合尔大学医学和牙科学院学习。材料与方法:本横断面调查于2019年9月在拉合尔大学医学和牙科大学学院进行。采用方便抽样法,对MBBS前三年的322名学生进行抽样。分发了一份预先验证的问卷,并要求学生使用5分李克特量表记录他们对小组讨论的体验。结果:对于小组讨论的质量,25.8%的学生满意,24.8%的学生一般,49.4%的学生不满意。当被问及是否清楚自己在SGD会议中的角色时,55.9%的学生表示同意,22.7%表示不清楚,21.4%表示中立。至于小组会议的好处,大多数人(35.1%)同意活动教授终身学习,8.7%强烈同意。27%的人保持中立,16.5%的人不同意,12.75%的人非常不同意。在对导师的评价方面,大多数学生认为SGD辅导员对过程充满热情,其中13.4%非常同意,36.3%同意,28%保持中立,9.6%不同意,12.75%非常不同意。大多数学生(35.1%同意,13.4%强烈同意)认为导师只是进行了迷你讲座,27.6%的学生对陈述持中立态度,11.2%的学生不同意,12.7%的学生非常不同意。结论:研究表明,大多数学生清楚自己在小组讨论中的角色,大多数(35.1%)也同意活动教会了他们终身学习。导师是有帮助的,热情的,然而,他们提供了大量的信息,需要再培训来进行小组学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信