Scoping the new urban human rights agenda

IF 0.6 Q2 Social Sciences

Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law Pub Date : 2019-05-04 DOI:10.1080/07329113.2019.1596732

Martha F. Davis

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract This article situates the preceding contributions to this special section, all focused on aspects of urban or municipal human rights, within the larger context of the challenges raised by local human rights implementation. It discusses the ways in which the research themes presented are both interrelated and divergent. This closing article also identifies themes for additional future research, including particularly the challenge of accountability for human rights realization on the local level.

查看原文本刊更多论文

确定新的城市人权议程

本文将之前对这一特殊章节的贡献置于地方人权实施所面临挑战的大背景下，这些贡献都集中在城市或市政人权的各个方面。它讨论了所提出的研究主题既相互关联又不同的方式。这篇结束语还确定了未来进一步研究的主题，特别是在地方一级实现人权的问责制所面临的挑战。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law LAW-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： As the pioneering journal in this field The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law (JLP) has a long history of publishing leading scholarship in the area of legal anthropology and legal pluralism and is the only international journal dedicated to the analysis of legal pluralism. It is a refereed scholarly journal with a genuinely global reach, publishing both empirical and theoretical contributions from a variety of disciplines, including (but not restricted to) Anthropology, Legal Studies, Development Studies and interdisciplinary studies. The JLP is devoted to scholarly writing and works that further current debates in the field of legal pluralism and to disseminating new and emerging findings from fieldwork. The Journal welcomes papers that make original contributions to understanding any aspect of legal pluralism and unofficial law, anywhere in the world, both in historic and contemporary contexts. We invite high-quality, original submissions that engage with this purpose.