Another Cosmopolitanism: A Critical Reconstruction of the Neo-Confucian Conception of Tianxiaweigong (天下爲公) in the Age of Global Risks

Young-Do Park, Sang-Jin Han
{"title":"Another Cosmopolitanism: A Critical Reconstruction of the Neo-Confucian Conception of Tianxiaweigong (天下爲公) in the Age of Global Risks","authors":"Young-Do Park, Sang-Jin Han","doi":"10.21588/DNS.2014.43.2.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we would like to present the profile of 'another' cosmopolitanism through critical reconstruction of one of the core elements in Chinese political imaginary, the conception of Tianxiaweigong (TETS'il·), which means literally: \"All under the Heaven belongs to the public.\" The first meaning of 'another cosmopolitanism' lies in the fact that it starts not from the main western tradition of cosmopolitanism, but from the tradition of Confucian political thoughts. However, it has a second, but more important meaning that is concerned with two deficits which the cosmopolitan publicness in the age of global risks should cope with; the \"democratic deficit\" and what we would like to call 'ecological deficits'. The critical cosmopolitan project in the age of global risks needs to be reflective in dual senses to cope with both two deficits. The second meaning of 'another cosmopolitanism' lies in this critical cosmopolitan project.So our method of critical reconstruction is for putting together these two meanings to create a critical Confucian cosmopolitanism in a hermeneutic circle. On the one hand, we will reconstruct the Confucian cosmopolitanism from the viewpoint of the critical cosmopolitanism, and one the other hand we will explore the potentials of Confucian cosmopolitanism for providing the model of reflective publicness in its dual senses which is necessary for critical cosmopolitanism.We would like to proceed in the following way. First, we will present basic features of the cosmopolitanism implied in Tianxiaweigong and explain the reason why the reflective publicness in its dual senses is necessary for critical cosmopolitanism. Second, the grammar of Confucian cosmopolitan publicness contained in Neo-Confucian conception of Tianxiaweigong will be reconstructed. Third, we will discuss the three paths of reconstructing the Heavenly Principle in the name of the dialectic of Confucian enlightenment, and, based on this reconstruction, will present the profile of the ecodemocratic publicness as the critically reconstructed Neo-Confucian cosmopolitan order. Lastly, we will explain its reflective structure in its dual sense and explore its implication for our age of global risks.Keywords: Tianxiaweigong (...), Critical Confucian Cosmopolitanism, Grammar of the Neo-Confucian Cosmopolitan Publicness, Dialectic of Confucian Enlightenment, Ecological Deficit, Reflective Publicness in Its Dual Senses.(ProQuest: ... denotes non-US-ASCII text omitted.)I. IntroductionAs a result of globalization we are now witnessing the rapid increase both of global interdependence and global risks. Global financial crisis, terrorism, paradox of the humanitarian-military intervention, and global ecological risks including climate change and nuclear accidents show us clearly that we are living in the age of global risks (Beck 2009). So the demand of a global publicness (T^'l'i) which is expected to be able to coordinate these global interactions and cope with the global risks comes up on the agenda not only of academic, but also of global political discussions. Meanwhile, however, it also has become clear that neither the old international law regime nor the global American hegemonic regime could satisfy this demand. Thus explode various cosmopolitan discourses in various areas to give an alternative answer to this question of new global order (Archibugi 2008, Beck 2006, Delanty 2012, Habermas 2014, Held 2010).This paper also belongs to such discourses. In the following, however, we would like to present the profile of another' cosmopolitanism through critical reconstruction of one of the core elements in Chinese political imaginary, the conception of Tianxiaweigong ( Jf Ι' βiτ). which means literally: \" All under the Heaven belongs to the public.\" As is well known, Tianxiaweigong has never ceased to be the core Chinese political imaginary through China's long history. It was not only the regulative idea of traditional Confucian politics, but also was the leading political idea of Sun Wen (1866-1925), the leader of the Xinhai Revolution (1911), the first democratic revolution in China that destroyed the last Confucian empire. …","PeriodicalId":84572,"journal":{"name":"Development and society (Soul Taehakkyo. Institute for Social Devdelopment and Policy Research)","volume":"102 1","pages":"185-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and society (Soul Taehakkyo. Institute for Social Devdelopment and Policy Research)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21588/DNS.2014.43.2.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In this paper we would like to present the profile of 'another' cosmopolitanism through critical reconstruction of one of the core elements in Chinese political imaginary, the conception of Tianxiaweigong (TETS'il·), which means literally: "All under the Heaven belongs to the public." The first meaning of 'another cosmopolitanism' lies in the fact that it starts not from the main western tradition of cosmopolitanism, but from the tradition of Confucian political thoughts. However, it has a second, but more important meaning that is concerned with two deficits which the cosmopolitan publicness in the age of global risks should cope with; the "democratic deficit" and what we would like to call 'ecological deficits'. The critical cosmopolitan project in the age of global risks needs to be reflective in dual senses to cope with both two deficits. The second meaning of 'another cosmopolitanism' lies in this critical cosmopolitan project.So our method of critical reconstruction is for putting together these two meanings to create a critical Confucian cosmopolitanism in a hermeneutic circle. On the one hand, we will reconstruct the Confucian cosmopolitanism from the viewpoint of the critical cosmopolitanism, and one the other hand we will explore the potentials of Confucian cosmopolitanism for providing the model of reflective publicness in its dual senses which is necessary for critical cosmopolitanism.We would like to proceed in the following way. First, we will present basic features of the cosmopolitanism implied in Tianxiaweigong and explain the reason why the reflective publicness in its dual senses is necessary for critical cosmopolitanism. Second, the grammar of Confucian cosmopolitan publicness contained in Neo-Confucian conception of Tianxiaweigong will be reconstructed. Third, we will discuss the three paths of reconstructing the Heavenly Principle in the name of the dialectic of Confucian enlightenment, and, based on this reconstruction, will present the profile of the ecodemocratic publicness as the critically reconstructed Neo-Confucian cosmopolitan order. Lastly, we will explain its reflective structure in its dual sense and explore its implication for our age of global risks.Keywords: Tianxiaweigong (...), Critical Confucian Cosmopolitanism, Grammar of the Neo-Confucian Cosmopolitan Publicness, Dialectic of Confucian Enlightenment, Ecological Deficit, Reflective Publicness in Its Dual Senses.(ProQuest: ... denotes non-US-ASCII text omitted.)I. IntroductionAs a result of globalization we are now witnessing the rapid increase both of global interdependence and global risks. Global financial crisis, terrorism, paradox of the humanitarian-military intervention, and global ecological risks including climate change and nuclear accidents show us clearly that we are living in the age of global risks (Beck 2009). So the demand of a global publicness (T^'l'i) which is expected to be able to coordinate these global interactions and cope with the global risks comes up on the agenda not only of academic, but also of global political discussions. Meanwhile, however, it also has become clear that neither the old international law regime nor the global American hegemonic regime could satisfy this demand. Thus explode various cosmopolitan discourses in various areas to give an alternative answer to this question of new global order (Archibugi 2008, Beck 2006, Delanty 2012, Habermas 2014, Held 2010).This paper also belongs to such discourses. In the following, however, we would like to present the profile of another' cosmopolitanism through critical reconstruction of one of the core elements in Chinese political imaginary, the conception of Tianxiaweigong ( Jf Ι' βiτ). which means literally: " All under the Heaven belongs to the public." As is well known, Tianxiaweigong has never ceased to be the core Chinese political imaginary through China's long history. It was not only the regulative idea of traditional Confucian politics, but also was the leading political idea of Sun Wen (1866-1925), the leader of the Xinhai Revolution (1911), the first democratic revolution in China that destroyed the last Confucian empire. …
另一种世界主义:全球风险时代新儒家“天下为公”观念的批判性重构
在本文中,我们希望通过批判性地重构中国政治想象的核心要素之一——“天下为公”的概念,来呈现“另一种”世界主义的轮廓。“另一种世界主义”的第一个意义在于,它不是从西方主流的世界主义传统出发,而是从儒家政治思想的传统出发。然而,它还有另一个更重要的含义,即在全球风险时代,世界公共性应该应对的两个缺陷;“民主赤字”和我们称之为“生态赤字”。在全球风险时代,关键的世界性项目需要在双重意义上反思,以应对这两种缺陷。“另一种世界主义”的第二个意义在于这个批判性的世界主义计划。因此,我们的批判性重建方法是将这两种意义结合起来,在一个解释学的圈子里创造一种批判性的儒家世界主义。一方面,我们将从批判世界主义的角度重构儒家世界主义,另一方面,我们将探索儒家世界主义的潜力,为批判世界主义提供双重意义上的反思公共性模式。我们想按以下方式进行。首先,我们将呈现《天下公公》所蕴含的世界主义的基本特征,并解释为什么双重意义上的反思性公共性对于批判的世界主义是必要的。第二,重构新儒家天下公公观所包含的儒家世界公共性语法。第三,我们将以儒家启蒙辩证法的名义讨论重建天理的三条路径,并在此基础上,将生态民主公共性作为批判性重建的新儒家世界秩序呈现出来。最后,我们将解释其双重意义上的反射结构,并探讨其对我们这个全球风险时代的影响。关键词:《天下公公》、批判儒家世界主义、新儒家世界公共性语法、儒家启蒙辩证法、生态赤字、双重意义的反思性公共性(ProQuest:……表示省略的非us - ascii文本。作为全球化的结果,我们现在正目睹全球相互依存和全球风险的迅速增加。全球金融危机、恐怖主义、人道主义-军事干预的悖论以及包括气候变化和核事故在内的全球生态风险清楚地表明,我们生活在全球风险的时代(Beck 2009)。因此,对全球公共性的需求(T^'l'i)被期望能够协调这些全球互动并应对全球风险,这不仅提上了学术议程,也提上了全球政治讨论的议程。然而,与此同时,我们也清楚地看到,无论是旧的国际法体制还是美国的全球霸权体制都无法满足这一要求。因此,在各个领域爆发各种世界主义话语,为全球新秩序这个问题提供另一种答案(Archibugi 2008, Beck 2006, Delanty 2012, Habermas 2014, Held 2010)。本文也属于这样的话语。然而,在接下来的文章中,我们想通过批判性地重构中国政治想象的核心要素之一——“天下公公”(Jf Ι' βiτ)的概念,来呈现另一种“世界主义”的轮廓。它的字面意思是:“天下所有的东西都属于公众。”众所周知,在中国漫长的历史进程中,“天下为公”一直是中国政治想象的核心。它不仅是传统儒家政治的规范思想,也是辛亥革命(1911)的领导人孙文(1866-1925)的主导政治思想,辛亥革命是中国第一次民主革命,摧毁了最后一个儒家帝国。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书