Is It Possible to Improve Efficiency of BiH Decentralisation Model: Comparative Analysis of Decentralisation Solutions and Relevance for BiH Context

Aida Soko
{"title":"Is It Possible to Improve Efficiency of BiH Decentralisation Model: Comparative Analysis of Decentralisation Solutions and Relevance for BiH Context","authors":"Aida Soko","doi":"10.13189/sa.2018.060708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dayton Peace Agreement (DPA) has resulted in asymmetric decentralization in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) in all aspects: political, administrative and fiscal. Decentralization driven by non-economic reasons is rather usual concept, and often the main reasons are political, ethnical or overall country stability. Decentralization model implemented in BiH became huge obstacle not only in reaching efficiency in provision of public services, but also to further economic development. While the purpose of DPA was to stop armed conflict, and while valuable back in time, there is no excuse to keep these solutions for more than 20 years. This paper aims to provide deep insight into experience of selected comparative countries where non-economic reasons initiated decentralization. In addition, it aims to identify patterns and features of administrative, fiscal and political arrangements that perform better in the environment similar to BiH. Analysis of the experience in developed countries identified different models in organizing ethnically divided societies and establishing different forms of cooperation between sub-national government units to increase efficiency. Transitional countries experience shows mixed results in terms of positive effects of decentralization on overall efficiency and citizens' well-being, but there is valuable experience and number of features, which may improve municipal efficiency in BiH as well. Having in mind very limited literature focused on specific BiH context as well as the need to improve efficiency at local community level, this paper takes an important first step in this direction by providing a systematic review of decentralization design in countries that had similar challenges as BiH. The focus of comparative analysis is on the administrative decentralization (territorial organization and responsibility designation), political decentralization (addressing democratic principles) and fiscal independency. Paper has identified certain mechanisms that do not require any or require minor changes in core legislation introduced by DPA. These primarily include activation of cooperation mechanisms already allowed by law as well as improving system of revenue and grant allocation. Democratization still did not reached proper level as mechanisms introduced by DPA do not address rights of minorities, and this has to be changed. Improving municipal efficiency in BiH by applying experience of developed and transitional countries therefore may range from better cooperation according to the existing laws, to substantive changes of legislation.","PeriodicalId":21798,"journal":{"name":"Sociology and anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology and anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13189/sa.2018.060708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dayton Peace Agreement (DPA) has resulted in asymmetric decentralization in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) in all aspects: political, administrative and fiscal. Decentralization driven by non-economic reasons is rather usual concept, and often the main reasons are political, ethnical or overall country stability. Decentralization model implemented in BiH became huge obstacle not only in reaching efficiency in provision of public services, but also to further economic development. While the purpose of DPA was to stop armed conflict, and while valuable back in time, there is no excuse to keep these solutions for more than 20 years. This paper aims to provide deep insight into experience of selected comparative countries where non-economic reasons initiated decentralization. In addition, it aims to identify patterns and features of administrative, fiscal and political arrangements that perform better in the environment similar to BiH. Analysis of the experience in developed countries identified different models in organizing ethnically divided societies and establishing different forms of cooperation between sub-national government units to increase efficiency. Transitional countries experience shows mixed results in terms of positive effects of decentralization on overall efficiency and citizens' well-being, but there is valuable experience and number of features, which may improve municipal efficiency in BiH as well. Having in mind very limited literature focused on specific BiH context as well as the need to improve efficiency at local community level, this paper takes an important first step in this direction by providing a systematic review of decentralization design in countries that had similar challenges as BiH. The focus of comparative analysis is on the administrative decentralization (territorial organization and responsibility designation), political decentralization (addressing democratic principles) and fiscal independency. Paper has identified certain mechanisms that do not require any or require minor changes in core legislation introduced by DPA. These primarily include activation of cooperation mechanisms already allowed by law as well as improving system of revenue and grant allocation. Democratization still did not reached proper level as mechanisms introduced by DPA do not address rights of minorities, and this has to be changed. Improving municipal efficiency in BiH by applying experience of developed and transitional countries therefore may range from better cooperation according to the existing laws, to substantive changes of legislation.
是否有可能提高波黑分权模式的效率:分权解决方案的比较分析及其与波黑背景的相关性
《代顿和平协定》导致波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那(波黑)在政治、行政和财政等所有方面不对称的权力下放。非经济原因驱动的权力下放是一个相当常见的概念,通常主要原因是政治、种族或整体国家的稳定。在波黑实施的权力下放模式不仅成为提高公共服务提供效率的巨大障碍,而且也成为进一步经济发展的巨大障碍。虽然DPA的目的是制止武装冲突,虽然在过去很有价值,但没有理由将这些解决方案保留20多年。本文旨在深入了解一些非经济原因引发分权的比较国家的经验。此外,它的目的是查明在类似波黑的环境中表现较好的行政、财政和政治安排的模式和特点。通过对发达国家经验的分析,确定了在组织民族分裂社会和在地方政府单位之间建立不同形式的合作以提高效率方面的不同模式。过渡国家的经验表明,在权力下放对总体效率和公民福利的积极影响方面,结果好坏参半,但也有宝贵的经验和许多特点,可以提高波黑的市政效率。考虑到关注波黑具体情况的文献非常有限,以及提高当地社区效率的必要性,本文通过对与波黑面临类似挑战的国家的分权设计进行系统回顾,朝着这个方向迈出了重要的第一步。比较分析的重点是行政分权(领土组织和责任指定)、政治分权(处理民主原则)和财政独立。Paper已经确定了某些机制,这些机制不需要对DPA引入的核心立法进行任何或微小的修改。这主要包括激活法律已经允许的合作机制,以及改进收入和赠款分配制度。民主化仍然没有达到适当的程度,因为政治发展方案所采用的机制没有处理少数人的权利,这一点必须加以改变。因此,通过应用发达国家和转型期国家的经验来提高波黑的市政效率可能包括根据现有法律进行更好的合作,以及对立法进行实质性修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信