Forming the Theoretical Framework of the “Cancel Culture”: Conceptual Roots and Current Interpretations

Q2 Arts and Humanities
D. Dunas, A. N. Gureeva, P. A. Kireeva
{"title":"Forming the Theoretical Framework of the “Cancel Culture”: Conceptual Roots and Current Interpretations","authors":"D. Dunas, A. N. Gureeva, P. A. Kireeva","doi":"10.25205/1818-7919-2023-22-6-70-81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines and systematizes the most common theoretical approaches to the “cancel culture”, a widely spread mediatized phenomenon in contemporary social life. It focuses on analyzing primarily English-language academic discourse, since there are significantly more scholars examining this phenomenon. In addition to the literature review, the study uses monitoring methods of media publications on the related topic, which allows for revealing tendencies and dynamics of public and academic interest in the analyzed phenomenon. The paper describes the theoretical origins of the “cancel culture”, offers the most stable definitions and interpretations of the “cancel culture” today, and considers the concept of “cancel culture” in the context of the struggle for social justice. The theoretical interpretation of the phenomenon also includes a critical perspective: the “cancel culture” is condemned for its incompatibility with the promoted democratic ideals to the methods used by activists, the abuse of media power, etc. The “cancel culture” is criticized for the practice of lynching, or so-called “digital vigilantism”. Obviously, the “cancel culture” is both a positive and a negative phenomenon, which should be viewed in a comprehensive and in-depth way.","PeriodicalId":36462,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Novosibirskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Seriya: Istoriya, Filologiya","volume":"1068 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Novosibirskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Seriya: Istoriya, Filologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2023-22-6-70-81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper examines and systematizes the most common theoretical approaches to the “cancel culture”, a widely spread mediatized phenomenon in contemporary social life. It focuses on analyzing primarily English-language academic discourse, since there are significantly more scholars examining this phenomenon. In addition to the literature review, the study uses monitoring methods of media publications on the related topic, which allows for revealing tendencies and dynamics of public and academic interest in the analyzed phenomenon. The paper describes the theoretical origins of the “cancel culture”, offers the most stable definitions and interpretations of the “cancel culture” today, and considers the concept of “cancel culture” in the context of the struggle for social justice. The theoretical interpretation of the phenomenon also includes a critical perspective: the “cancel culture” is condemned for its incompatibility with the promoted democratic ideals to the methods used by activists, the abuse of media power, etc. The “cancel culture” is criticized for the practice of lynching, or so-called “digital vigilantism”. Obviously, the “cancel culture” is both a positive and a negative phenomenon, which should be viewed in a comprehensive and in-depth way.
“取消文化”理论框架的形成:概念根源与当代解读
“取消文化”是当代社会生活中广泛存在的一种媒介化现象,本文对这种现象最常见的理论途径进行了考察和梳理。它主要侧重于分析英语学术话语,因为有更多的学者研究这一现象。除了文献综述之外,本研究还使用了对相关主题的媒体出版物的监测方法,这可以揭示公众和学术界对所分析现象的兴趣趋势和动态。本文阐述了“取消文化”的理论渊源,给出了当今“取消文化”最稳定的定义和解释,并将“取消文化”的概念置于争取社会正义的语境中进行思考。对这一现象的理论解释也包含了批判的视角:“取消文化”因其与所倡导的民主理想不相容、活动家使用的方法、媒体权力的滥用等而受到谴责。“取消文化”因私刑或所谓的“数字警戒主义”而受到批评。显然,“取消文化”既是一种积极的现象,也是一种消极的现象,应该全面而深入地看待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信