Inside Frozen Geographies

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER
Edgaras Klivis
{"title":"Inside Frozen Geographies","authors":"Edgaras Klivis","doi":"10.7146/NTS.V32I2.124357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the annexation of the Crimean Peninsula by the Russian Federation in 2014, the attitude of Baltic theatre producers and artists towards cultural and institutional partnerships with Russian theatres and their involvement in the mutual artistic exchanges, tours, common projects, and networking changed; not only due to these exchanges becoming a controversial issue in the public eye, but also due to the polarization they caused in the artistic community itself. Some artists, like Latvian stage director Alvis Hermanis, have decisively terminated all their previous creative partnerships, arrangements and tours, calling also other theatre artists “to take sides”. Others, like Russian stage and film director Kirill Serebrennikov who, for years, had been involved with Baltic theatres, would regard taking sides as a disastrous yielding of culture to the logic of war – theatre should be kept as the last link between societies gradually separated by reciprocal propaganda insanity. Building upon these conflicts describing the changes in intercultural theatrical cooperation between Russian and Baltic theatres, the article focuses on the analysis of three productions: Dreams of Rainis by Kirill Serebrennikov at the Latvian National Theatre (2015), Alexander Pushkin’s play Boris Godunov directed by Eimuntas Nekrošius at the Lithuanian National Drama Theatre (2015) and Brodsky/Baryshnikov staged by Alvis Hermanis at the New Riga Theatre in 2016. All of the performances refused to stay inside the frameworks marked for them by the regimes of propaganda wars, public diplomacy, or dispositif of security, but focused instead on the possibilities of intellectual disobedience.","PeriodicalId":53807,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Theatre Studies","volume":"92 1","pages":"138-155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Theatre Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/NTS.V32I2.124357","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After the annexation of the Crimean Peninsula by the Russian Federation in 2014, the attitude of Baltic theatre producers and artists towards cultural and institutional partnerships with Russian theatres and their involvement in the mutual artistic exchanges, tours, common projects, and networking changed; not only due to these exchanges becoming a controversial issue in the public eye, but also due to the polarization they caused in the artistic community itself. Some artists, like Latvian stage director Alvis Hermanis, have decisively terminated all their previous creative partnerships, arrangements and tours, calling also other theatre artists “to take sides”. Others, like Russian stage and film director Kirill Serebrennikov who, for years, had been involved with Baltic theatres, would regard taking sides as a disastrous yielding of culture to the logic of war – theatre should be kept as the last link between societies gradually separated by reciprocal propaganda insanity. Building upon these conflicts describing the changes in intercultural theatrical cooperation between Russian and Baltic theatres, the article focuses on the analysis of three productions: Dreams of Rainis by Kirill Serebrennikov at the Latvian National Theatre (2015), Alexander Pushkin’s play Boris Godunov directed by Eimuntas Nekrošius at the Lithuanian National Drama Theatre (2015) and Brodsky/Baryshnikov staged by Alvis Hermanis at the New Riga Theatre in 2016. All of the performances refused to stay inside the frameworks marked for them by the regimes of propaganda wars, public diplomacy, or dispositif of security, but focused instead on the possibilities of intellectual disobedience.
冰冻的地理
2014年俄罗斯联邦吞并克里米亚半岛后,波罗的海戏剧制作人和艺术家对与俄罗斯剧院建立文化和机构伙伴关系以及参与相互艺术交流、巡回演出、共同项目和网络的态度发生了变化;不仅因为这些交流在公众眼中成为一个有争议的问题,还因为它们在艺术界本身造成了两极分化。一些艺术家,如拉脱维亚舞台导演阿尔维斯·赫曼尼斯(Alvis Hermanis),果断地终止了他们以前所有的创作伙伴关系、安排和巡演,呼吁其他戏剧艺术家“站队”。另一些人,比如俄罗斯舞台剧和电影导演基里尔·谢列布伦尼科夫,多年来一直参与波罗的海的戏剧,他认为站在一边是文化对战争逻辑的一种灾难性的屈服——戏剧应该被保留为社会之间的最后一环,因为相互的宣传疯狂而逐渐分离。以这些冲突为基础,描述了俄罗斯和波罗的海剧院之间跨文化戏剧合作的变化,本文重点分析了三部作品:拉脱维亚国家剧院Kirill Serebrennikov的《雨尼斯之梦》(2015),Eimuntas Nekrošius在立陶宛国家剧院执导的亚历山大·普希金的《鲍里斯·戈杜诺夫》(2015)和Alvis Hermanis在新里加剧院上演的《布罗茨基/巴里什尼科夫》(2016)。所有的表演都拒绝停留在由宣传战、公共外交或安全分配制度为他们标记的框架内,而是集中在智力不服从的可能性上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信