Robust Phase Retrieval with Complexity-Guidance for Coherent X-Ray Imaging

IF 2.2 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
Mansi Butola, Sunaina Rajora, K. Khare
{"title":"Robust Phase Retrieval with Complexity-Guidance for Coherent X-Ray Imaging","authors":"Mansi Butola, Sunaina Rajora, K. Khare","doi":"10.34133/2022/9819716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reconstruction of a stable and reliable solution from noisy and incomplete Fourier intensity data is a challenging problem for iterative phase retrieval algorithms. The typical methodology employed in the coherent X-ray imaging (CXI) literature involves thousands of iterations of well-known phase retrieval algorithms, e.g., hybrid input-output (HIO) or relaxed averaged alternating reflections (RAAR), that are concluded with a smaller number of error reduction (ER) iterations. Since the single run of this methodology may not provide a reliable solution, hundreds of trial solutions are first obtained by initializing the phase retrieval algorithm with independent random guesses. The resulting trial solutions are then averaged with appropriate phase adjustment, and resolution of the averaged reconstruction is assessed by plotting the phase retrieval transfer function (PRTF). In this work, we examine this commonly used RAAR-ER methodology from the perspective of the complexity parameter introduced by us in recent years. It is observed that the single run of the RAAR-ER algorithm provides a solution with undesirable grainy artifacts that persist to some extent even after averaging the multiple trial solutions. The grainy features are spurious in the sense that they are smaller in size compared to the resolution predicted by the PRTF curve. This inconsistency can be addressed by a novel methodology that we refer to as complexity-guided RAAR (CG-RAAR). The methodology is demonstrated with simulations and experimental data sets from the CXIDB database. In addition to providing consistent solution, CG-RAAR is also observed to require reduced number of independent trials for averaging.","PeriodicalId":45291,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34133/2022/9819716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reconstruction of a stable and reliable solution from noisy and incomplete Fourier intensity data is a challenging problem for iterative phase retrieval algorithms. The typical methodology employed in the coherent X-ray imaging (CXI) literature involves thousands of iterations of well-known phase retrieval algorithms, e.g., hybrid input-output (HIO) or relaxed averaged alternating reflections (RAAR), that are concluded with a smaller number of error reduction (ER) iterations. Since the single run of this methodology may not provide a reliable solution, hundreds of trial solutions are first obtained by initializing the phase retrieval algorithm with independent random guesses. The resulting trial solutions are then averaged with appropriate phase adjustment, and resolution of the averaged reconstruction is assessed by plotting the phase retrieval transfer function (PRTF). In this work, we examine this commonly used RAAR-ER methodology from the perspective of the complexity parameter introduced by us in recent years. It is observed that the single run of the RAAR-ER algorithm provides a solution with undesirable grainy artifacts that persist to some extent even after averaging the multiple trial solutions. The grainy features are spurious in the sense that they are smaller in size compared to the resolution predicted by the PRTF curve. This inconsistency can be addressed by a novel methodology that we refer to as complexity-guided RAAR (CG-RAAR). The methodology is demonstrated with simulations and experimental data sets from the CXIDB database. In addition to providing consistent solution, CG-RAAR is also observed to require reduced number of independent trials for averaging.
基于复杂度制导的相干x射线成像鲁棒相位恢复
从噪声和不完整的傅立叶强度数据中重建稳定可靠的解是迭代相位恢复算法的一个挑战。相干x射线成像(CXI)文献中采用的典型方法涉及众所周知的相位检索算法的数千次迭代,例如混合输入输出(HIO)或松弛平均交替反射(RAAR),这些算法通过较少的误差减少(ER)迭代得出结论。由于该方法的单次运行可能无法提供可靠的解,因此首先通过初始化具有独立随机猜测的相位检索算法获得数百个试验解。然后对得到的试验解进行适当相位调整的平均,并通过绘制相位恢复传递函数(PRTF)来评估平均重建的分辨率。在这项工作中,我们从我们近年来引入的复杂性参数的角度来研究这种常用的RAAR-ER方法。可以观察到,RAAR-ER算法的单次运行提供了一个具有不良颗粒伪影的解决方案,即使在多次试验解决方案平均后,这些伪影在某种程度上仍然存在。颗粒状特征是虚假的,因为它们的尺寸比PRTF曲线预测的分辨率要小。这种不一致可以通过一种新的方法来解决,我们称之为复杂性引导的RAAR (CG-RAAR)。该方法通过CXIDB数据库中的仿真和实验数据集进行了验证。除了提供一致的解决方案外,CG-RAAR还可以减少独立试验的平均次数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
4.70%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信