Evaluation of the success of shock index and its derivatives in determining mortality in STEMI cases applied to emergency department

G. Yurtsever, A. Çakır, E. Bora
{"title":"Evaluation of the success of shock index and its derivatives in determining mortality in STEMI cases applied to emergency department","authors":"G. Yurtsever, A. Çakır, E. Bora","doi":"10.18621/eurj.1340926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The shock index (SI) and its derivatives play a crucial role in rapid prognosis and risk assessment, particularly in emergent scenarios like ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).\nMethods: This study was conducted as a single-centered retrospective. A total of 467 cases that met the study criteria with a confirmed STEMI diagnosis were included. The SI, modified SI (MSI), age SI (ASI), and age-modified SI (AMSI) scores of the cases were calculated and compared. In this study, p 0.05 was accepted as the statistical significance level.\nResults: Calculated scores were compared among cases meeting STEMI criteria. Mortal cases displayed significantly higher SI, MSI, ASI, and AMSI, as well as elevated heart rates and lowered SBP, DBP, and MAP values. ASI exhibited the highest predictive success for mortality (AUC: 0.802), followed by AMSI (AUC: 0.798). AMSI demonstrated superior significance in estimating major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (p < 0.001 for each parameter).\nConclusions: ASI proved most effective in gauging mortality risk, while AMSI excelled in predicting MACE risk among SI derivatives. These indices hold promise for guiding patient triage and emergency care in STEMI cases, owing to their simplicity and predictive capacity.","PeriodicalId":22571,"journal":{"name":"The European Research Journal","volume":"70 5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1340926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The shock index (SI) and its derivatives play a crucial role in rapid prognosis and risk assessment, particularly in emergent scenarios like ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: This study was conducted as a single-centered retrospective. A total of 467 cases that met the study criteria with a confirmed STEMI diagnosis were included. The SI, modified SI (MSI), age SI (ASI), and age-modified SI (AMSI) scores of the cases were calculated and compared. In this study, p 0.05 was accepted as the statistical significance level. Results: Calculated scores were compared among cases meeting STEMI criteria. Mortal cases displayed significantly higher SI, MSI, ASI, and AMSI, as well as elevated heart rates and lowered SBP, DBP, and MAP values. ASI exhibited the highest predictive success for mortality (AUC: 0.802), followed by AMSI (AUC: 0.798). AMSI demonstrated superior significance in estimating major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (p < 0.001 for each parameter). Conclusions: ASI proved most effective in gauging mortality risk, while AMSI excelled in predicting MACE risk among SI derivatives. These indices hold promise for guiding patient triage and emergency care in STEMI cases, owing to their simplicity and predictive capacity.
休克指数及其衍生指标在急诊科确定STEMI病例死亡率的成功评价
目的:休克指数(shock index, SI)及其衍生物在快速预后和风险评估中起着至关重要的作用,特别是在st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)等紧急情况下。方法:本研究采用单中心回顾性研究。共纳入467例符合研究标准并确诊STEMI的病例。计算并比较病例的SI、改良SI (MSI)、年龄SI (ASI)和年龄改良SI (AMSI)评分。在本研究中,以p 0.05为统计学显著水平。结果:在符合STEMI标准的病例中比较计算得分。死亡病例显示明显较高的SI、MSI、ASI和AMSI,以及心率升高、收缩压、舒张压和MAP值降低。ASI对死亡率的预测成功率最高(AUC: 0.802),其次是AMSI (AUC: 0.798)。AMSI在估计主要不良心血管事件(MACE)方面具有显著性(各参数p < 0.001)。结论:ASI证明在衡量死亡风险方面最有效,而AMSI在预测SI衍生品中的MACE风险方面表现出色。由于其简单和预测能力,这些指数有望指导STEMI病例的患者分诊和急诊护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信