Social Work or Relief Work? A Crisis in Professional Social Work

H. Adhikari
{"title":"Social Work or Relief Work? A Crisis in Professional Social Work","authors":"H. Adhikari","doi":"10.1515/scr-2015-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Social work is a sharing and caring profession based on scientific methods. This problem solving profession makes people self-reliant and self-dependent when he/she is in any sorts of crises. Thus, it differs from relief work, social services or social welfare delivered during emergence crises. This paper examined the application of professional social work as relief work, which did not bring any change among the beneficiaries; rather it set their mind as opportunist. For this purpose, the programme sponsored by the government of India and implemented by nongovernmental organizations for rehabilitation of the street children (i.e., pavements and slums dwellers, children of sex workers, and so forth) of Metro cities like Kolkata had priority. This evaluative study assessed the progress and changes among 500 street children who were the beneficiaries for 10 years of the programme, selected according to their parental residents/occupation through stratified sampling. Interviews, case studies and group interaction were used to collect data on various aspects, i.e. personal background, education, and occupation of these children. It revealed that after almost 10 years of services, the problem of children was static. Firstly, service delivery system was as relief work. The methods of social work were not implied while the professionals were in implementation. On the other hand, the scope of monitoring and evaluation of the programme by government was suspended due to several reasons. Definitely, the politicalization in human development would be restricted. The problems of suffering would be root out and it should not be a continued process.","PeriodicalId":83295,"journal":{"name":"The Urban & social change review","volume":"9 1","pages":"55 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Urban & social change review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/scr-2015-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Social work is a sharing and caring profession based on scientific methods. This problem solving profession makes people self-reliant and self-dependent when he/she is in any sorts of crises. Thus, it differs from relief work, social services or social welfare delivered during emergence crises. This paper examined the application of professional social work as relief work, which did not bring any change among the beneficiaries; rather it set their mind as opportunist. For this purpose, the programme sponsored by the government of India and implemented by nongovernmental organizations for rehabilitation of the street children (i.e., pavements and slums dwellers, children of sex workers, and so forth) of Metro cities like Kolkata had priority. This evaluative study assessed the progress and changes among 500 street children who were the beneficiaries for 10 years of the programme, selected according to their parental residents/occupation through stratified sampling. Interviews, case studies and group interaction were used to collect data on various aspects, i.e. personal background, education, and occupation of these children. It revealed that after almost 10 years of services, the problem of children was static. Firstly, service delivery system was as relief work. The methods of social work were not implied while the professionals were in implementation. On the other hand, the scope of monitoring and evaluation of the programme by government was suspended due to several reasons. Definitely, the politicalization in human development would be restricted. The problems of suffering would be root out and it should not be a continued process.
社会工作还是救济工作?专业社会工作的危机
社会工作是一种以科学的方法为基础的分享和关怀的职业。这种解决问题的职业使人在遇到任何危机时都能自力更生,自力更生。因此,它不同于紧急危机期间提供的救济工作、社会服务或社会福利。本文考察了专业社会工作作为救济工作的应用,并没有给受益人带来任何变化;相反,这让他们认为自己是机会主义者。为此目的,印度政府赞助并由非政府组织执行的使加尔各答等大都市的街头儿童(即人行道和贫民窟的居民、性工作者的子女等等)康复的方案具有优先地位。这项评价研究评估了500名街头儿童的进展和变化,这些儿童是该方案10年来的受益者,他们是根据父母的居民/职业分层抽样选出的。采用访谈、个案研究和小组互动等方法收集了这些儿童的个人背景、教育和职业等方面的数据。报告显示,经过近10年的服务,儿童问题是静态的。首先,服务提供系统作为救济工作。社会工作的方法并没有在专业人员实施的过程中被暗示。另一方面,由于几个原因,政府对方案的监测和评价范围被暂停。当然,人类发展的政治化将受到限制。痛苦的问题将被根除,而不应该是一个持续的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信