Cost-Effective Sour Management in Mixed Production Systems

Soma Chakraborty, S. Lehrer, Jagrut Jani, S. Ramachandran
{"title":"Cost-Effective Sour Management in Mixed Production Systems","authors":"Soma Chakraborty, S. Lehrer, Jagrut Jani, S. Ramachandran","doi":"10.2118/194884-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Sour production from offshore and land-based wells causes hydrogen sulfide (H2S) release during downhole and topsides operations. Improper handling of H2S can lead to serious environmental and safety concerns as well as numerous corrosion and compliance issues. Consequently, H2S can add significantly to the total cost of well operations. The application of efficient H2S management technologies can reduce environmental and safety concerns, enable the use of lower-cost materials, and comply with H2S specifications. To remove H2S from mixed production applications, several chemistries are commonly used. The most common are triazines, glyoxal, and metal-based chemistries. Although each can be effective to a certain extent, these technologies have issues with efficiency or they can create serious side issues. The reaction of triazines with H2S in mixed production is highly inefficient and it creates scaling. Glyoxals suffer from poor efficiency, thermal instability, and corrosivity. The metal-based chemistries are the most efficient in mixed production, but in certain application regimes they can create serious solids and emulsion issues. These challenges can increase CAPEX and OPEX as well as lead to significant downtime and lost production. To overcome issues with currently used chemistries in mixed sour production, extensive research was conducted to identify chemistry that would efficiently remove H2S while minimizing negative side effects.\n Systematic evaluation was performed for a series of chemistries to compare the scavenging efficiency, with a special emphasis on mixed production systems. Focus was also given on studying the associated side effects like emulsification tendency, scaling tendency, etc. to ensure the chemistry had no/minimal side effects seen by the more conventional chemistries. A high-throughput lab technique is presented that was designed to mimic scavenging tendency in sour mixed production environment. A continuous gas flow testing technique that helped study the reaction kinetics is also described.\n Laboratory and pre-field results proved the efficacy of the new non-MEA, non-triazine chemistry in mitigating H2S in upstream, midstream and downstream applications while being especially efficient in mixed production systems. Laboratory testing proved the chemistry to be highly efficient compared to triazine in mixed production systems. Results also indicated the chemistry is non-emulsion forming and has very little scaling tendency. Testing conducted in the field demonstrated that the new chemistry cost-effectively removes H2S and meets the operator specifications.\n The novel, non-triazine scavenger technology has significantly better performance than triazine, no emulsion concerns, acceptable HSE, non-corrosive effects, and less downstream concern than MEA triazine or metal-based scavengers. The new and differentiated chemistry reduces CAPEX and OPEX, drives productivity, improves reliability and reduces non-productive time.","PeriodicalId":11321,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, March 20, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, March 20, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/194884-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sour production from offshore and land-based wells causes hydrogen sulfide (H2S) release during downhole and topsides operations. Improper handling of H2S can lead to serious environmental and safety concerns as well as numerous corrosion and compliance issues. Consequently, H2S can add significantly to the total cost of well operations. The application of efficient H2S management technologies can reduce environmental and safety concerns, enable the use of lower-cost materials, and comply with H2S specifications. To remove H2S from mixed production applications, several chemistries are commonly used. The most common are triazines, glyoxal, and metal-based chemistries. Although each can be effective to a certain extent, these technologies have issues with efficiency or they can create serious side issues. The reaction of triazines with H2S in mixed production is highly inefficient and it creates scaling. Glyoxals suffer from poor efficiency, thermal instability, and corrosivity. The metal-based chemistries are the most efficient in mixed production, but in certain application regimes they can create serious solids and emulsion issues. These challenges can increase CAPEX and OPEX as well as lead to significant downtime and lost production. To overcome issues with currently used chemistries in mixed sour production, extensive research was conducted to identify chemistry that would efficiently remove H2S while minimizing negative side effects. Systematic evaluation was performed for a series of chemistries to compare the scavenging efficiency, with a special emphasis on mixed production systems. Focus was also given on studying the associated side effects like emulsification tendency, scaling tendency, etc. to ensure the chemistry had no/minimal side effects seen by the more conventional chemistries. A high-throughput lab technique is presented that was designed to mimic scavenging tendency in sour mixed production environment. A continuous gas flow testing technique that helped study the reaction kinetics is also described. Laboratory and pre-field results proved the efficacy of the new non-MEA, non-triazine chemistry in mitigating H2S in upstream, midstream and downstream applications while being especially efficient in mixed production systems. Laboratory testing proved the chemistry to be highly efficient compared to triazine in mixed production systems. Results also indicated the chemistry is non-emulsion forming and has very little scaling tendency. Testing conducted in the field demonstrated that the new chemistry cost-effectively removes H2S and meets the operator specifications. The novel, non-triazine scavenger technology has significantly better performance than triazine, no emulsion concerns, acceptable HSE, non-corrosive effects, and less downstream concern than MEA triazine or metal-based scavengers. The new and differentiated chemistry reduces CAPEX and OPEX, drives productivity, improves reliability and reduces non-productive time.
混合生产系统的成本效益管理
海上和陆地油井的产酸会在井下和地面作业过程中释放硫化氢(H2S)。H2S处理不当会导致严重的环境和安全问题,以及许多腐蚀和合规问题。因此,H2S会显著增加钻井作业的总成本。高效的H2S管理技术的应用可以减少对环境和安全的担忧,使用更低成本的材料,并符合H2S规范。为了从混合生产应用中去除H2S,通常使用几种化学物质。最常见的是三嗪类、乙二醛和金属基化学物质。尽管每种技术在一定程度上都是有效的,但这些技术在效率方面存在问题,或者它们可能会产生严重的副作用。在混合生产中,三嗪与H2S的反应效率很低,而且会产生结垢。乙二醛具有效率低、热不稳定性和腐蚀性。金属基化学剂在混合生产中是最有效的,但在某些应用制度下,它们可能会产生严重的固体和乳液问题。这些挑战会增加资本支出和运营成本,并导致严重的停机时间和生产损失。为了克服目前混合酸生产中使用的化学物质存在的问题,研究人员进行了广泛的研究,以确定能够有效去除H2S的化学物质,同时将负面影响降到最低。对一系列化学物质进行了系统评价,比较了清除效率,特别强调了混合生产系统。我们还重点研究了相关的副作用,如乳化倾向、结垢倾向等,以确保该化学物质没有或只有更传统化学物质所见的副作用。提出了一种高通量实验室技术,旨在模拟酸性混合生产环境中的清除倾向。本文还介绍了一种有助于研究反应动力学的连续气体流量测试技术。实验室和现场前试验结果证明,新型非mea、非三嗪类化学物质在上游、中游和下游应用中具有降低H2S的效果,在混合生产系统中尤其有效。实验室测试证明,与混合生产系统中的三嗪相比,该化学物质具有很高的效率。结果还表明,化学性质不形成乳液,结垢倾向很小。现场测试表明,新型化学剂能够经济有效地去除H2S,并满足作业者的要求。这种新型的、不含三嗪的清除剂技术的性能明显优于三嗪,没有乳化液问题,可接受的HSE,无腐蚀影响,并且比MEA三嗪或金属基清除剂对下游的影响更小。新型的差异化化学产品降低了资本支出和运营成本,提高了生产率,提高了可靠性,减少了非生产时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信