The evaluation of two eleventh-grade senior high school textbooks

Delpianus Piong, Ra. Hasti Robiasih
{"title":"The evaluation of two eleventh-grade senior high school textbooks","authors":"Delpianus Piong, Ra. Hasti Robiasih","doi":"10.36597/JELP.V3I2.8008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objectives of this research are to (1) describe the appropriateness of two English textbooks for the eleventh graders of senior high school based on Mukundan’s criteria, and (2) describe the strengths and weaknesses of the textbooks. This research is categorized as evaluation research as it aims at evaluating the appropriateness of two English textbooks. The data were collected through document analysis and to make sure the validity and readability of the research, therefore the researcher includes one of senior high school English teachers as the interrater reliability. The objects of the research are two English textbooks; Pathway to English and Talk Active for the eleventh graders of senior high school. The research found out that both textbooks Pathway to English and Talk Active meet the criteria of a good textbook. PTE textbook fully meets 11 criteria out of 14 criteria based on Mukundan’s criteria; the book in relation to syllabus and curriculum, methodology, supplementary materials, general content, listening, speaking, reading, writing, vocabulary, grammar, and exercises. Meanwhile, TA textbook successfully fulfils 6 criteria out of 14 criteria based on Mukundan’s criteria; the book in relation to syllabus and curriculum, methodology, general content, writing, pronunciation and exercises. The results also reveal the strengths and weaknesses of each textbook. First, the PTE textbook has the strengths in the specification of the syllabus, various teaching-learning activities, activities address learning targets, supplementary material like a workbook and audio recording, teacher’s guide, simplicity and complexity of the tasks, tasks are supportive, appropriate listening tasks, the language use is authentic, speaking activities are designed to initiate students’ communicative practice and varied exercises. The weaknesses of PTE are the textbook does not provide pronunciation activity, the layout is less attractive, the price is expensive, it does not include various listening contexts such formal and informal contexts and also it has no a ready-made CD as support for listening skill. Meanwhile, the strengths of TA are the textbook is relevant to syllabus and curriculum, it provides workable activities which work well in most classroom situations, varied tasks which move from simple to complex, speaking activities are developed to improve students’ meaningful communication, reading texts are appropriate in length, writing tasks have achievable goals of improving students writing skills and the tasks are interesting, there is a number of new words across in each lesson, the textbook provides students with a glossary at the back of the textbook, pronunciation tasks are useful and interesting, exercises are adequate and they have clear instructions to understand. The main weakness of TA is that the textbook does not have an authentic audio recording or CD for listening skills, the listening activities are less appropriate and various listening contexts are not considered, individual, pairs and group work are not given in the same way in speaking practice, the price of the textbook is too expensive, it does not indicate efficient use of texts and visuals and overall, the textbook is less appropriate for the background knowledge and levels of students since it is provided balanced four basic language skills in it.","PeriodicalId":32887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice","volume":"1047 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36597/JELP.V3I2.8008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The objectives of this research are to (1) describe the appropriateness of two English textbooks for the eleventh graders of senior high school based on Mukundan’s criteria, and (2) describe the strengths and weaknesses of the textbooks. This research is categorized as evaluation research as it aims at evaluating the appropriateness of two English textbooks. The data were collected through document analysis and to make sure the validity and readability of the research, therefore the researcher includes one of senior high school English teachers as the interrater reliability. The objects of the research are two English textbooks; Pathway to English and Talk Active for the eleventh graders of senior high school. The research found out that both textbooks Pathway to English and Talk Active meet the criteria of a good textbook. PTE textbook fully meets 11 criteria out of 14 criteria based on Mukundan’s criteria; the book in relation to syllabus and curriculum, methodology, supplementary materials, general content, listening, speaking, reading, writing, vocabulary, grammar, and exercises. Meanwhile, TA textbook successfully fulfils 6 criteria out of 14 criteria based on Mukundan’s criteria; the book in relation to syllabus and curriculum, methodology, general content, writing, pronunciation and exercises. The results also reveal the strengths and weaknesses of each textbook. First, the PTE textbook has the strengths in the specification of the syllabus, various teaching-learning activities, activities address learning targets, supplementary material like a workbook and audio recording, teacher’s guide, simplicity and complexity of the tasks, tasks are supportive, appropriate listening tasks, the language use is authentic, speaking activities are designed to initiate students’ communicative practice and varied exercises. The weaknesses of PTE are the textbook does not provide pronunciation activity, the layout is less attractive, the price is expensive, it does not include various listening contexts such formal and informal contexts and also it has no a ready-made CD as support for listening skill. Meanwhile, the strengths of TA are the textbook is relevant to syllabus and curriculum, it provides workable activities which work well in most classroom situations, varied tasks which move from simple to complex, speaking activities are developed to improve students’ meaningful communication, reading texts are appropriate in length, writing tasks have achievable goals of improving students writing skills and the tasks are interesting, there is a number of new words across in each lesson, the textbook provides students with a glossary at the back of the textbook, pronunciation tasks are useful and interesting, exercises are adequate and they have clear instructions to understand. The main weakness of TA is that the textbook does not have an authentic audio recording or CD for listening skills, the listening activities are less appropriate and various listening contexts are not considered, individual, pairs and group work are not given in the same way in speaking practice, the price of the textbook is too expensive, it does not indicate efficient use of texts and visuals and overall, the textbook is less appropriate for the background knowledge and levels of students since it is provided balanced four basic language skills in it.
高中11年级两本教材的评价
本研究的目的是:(1)根据mukundan的标准描述两本高中11年级英语教科书的适当性,(2)描述教科书的优缺点。本研究被归类为评价研究,因为它旨在评价两本英语教科书的适当性。通过文献分析收集数据,为了确保研究的有效性和可读性,因此研究者选取了一位高中英语教师作为信度。本文以两本英语教材为研究对象;高二英语与对话活动之路。研究发现,《英语途径》和《积极交谈》两本教材都符合优秀教材的标准。PTE教科书完全符合mukundan标准14项标准中的11项标准;本书涉及教学大纲和课程设置、方法论、补充材料、一般内容、听、说、读、写、词汇、语法和练习。与此同时,TA的教科书成功地满足了穆昆达标准14个标准中的6个标准;这本书涉及到教学大纲和课程,方法论,一般内容,写作,发音和练习。结果还揭示了每本教科书的优缺点。首先,PTE教材在教学大纲的规范、丰富的教与学活动、针对学习目标的活动、练习册和录音等辅助材料、教师的指导、任务的简便性和复杂性、任务的支持性、听力任务的适当性、语言的使用是真实的、口语活动旨在激发学生的交际练习和多样化的练习等方面具有优势。PTE的缺点是教科书不提供发音活动,布局不太吸引人,价格昂贵,它不包括各种正式和非正式的听力环境,也没有现成的CD作为听力技能的支持。同时,TA的优势在于教材与教学大纲和课程相关,它提供了在大多数课堂情况下都能很好地工作的可行活动,从简单到复杂的各种任务,口语活动的开发是为了提高学生的€™有意义的交流,阅读文本的长度合适,写作任务有可实现的目标,提高学生的写作技能,任务很有趣,每节课都有一些新单词。教材的后面提供了词汇表,发音任务有用且有趣,练习足够,并且有清晰的说明。助教的主要缺点是教材没有真实的听力技巧录音或CD,听力活动不太合适,没有考虑到各种听力背景,在口语练习中个人,成对和小组作业的方式不一样,教材的价格太贵,它没有表明有效利用文本和视觉效果。由于教材中提供了均衡的四种基本语言技能,因此不太适合学生的背景知识和水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信