da proteção à instrução: mobilizações prático-discursivas em torno da infância nos debates sobre gênero e sexualidade na educação

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
A. Mattos, R. Cavalheiro
{"title":"da proteção à instrução: mobilizações prático-discursivas em torno da infância nos debates sobre gênero e sexualidade na educação","authors":"A. Mattos, R. Cavalheiro","doi":"10.12957/childphilo.2020.48344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses how some childhood senses have been triggered in the confrontations about the legitimacy of gender and sexuality themes in education, considering the contemporary scenario in the country. For this, we aim to analyze two practical-discursive pitfalls that have been consolidated. The first, forged by the actors of the anti-gender offensive, consists of the narrative construction of vulnerable children, to be protected, and triggers moral panic against discussions about gender and sexuality in schools. The second, more subtle trap, concerns the place of the passivity of students in the school context, which are the subject of instruction by teachers - including when gender and sexuality issues are addressed in the classroom. The image of a child-prisoner of the “gender ideologues”, passive and in danger, populates the statements analyzed in the first session, and allows us to discuss the political uses mitigated by the hyperinflation of this idea of child vulnerability. However, even in educational practices that focus on working with issues of gender and sexuality in school contexts, we observe that minority can be thought of in conservative perspectives and without agency, as discussed in the second session. To tension these logics, we point out the dimension of playfulness and play as conceptual and methodological tools that can contribute to a non-pedagogical approach to sexuality and gender in the field of education.","PeriodicalId":42107,"journal":{"name":"Childhood and Philosophy","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Childhood and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2020.48344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article discusses how some childhood senses have been triggered in the confrontations about the legitimacy of gender and sexuality themes in education, considering the contemporary scenario in the country. For this, we aim to analyze two practical-discursive pitfalls that have been consolidated. The first, forged by the actors of the anti-gender offensive, consists of the narrative construction of vulnerable children, to be protected, and triggers moral panic against discussions about gender and sexuality in schools. The second, more subtle trap, concerns the place of the passivity of students in the school context, which are the subject of instruction by teachers - including when gender and sexuality issues are addressed in the classroom. The image of a child-prisoner of the “gender ideologues”, passive and in danger, populates the statements analyzed in the first session, and allows us to discuss the political uses mitigated by the hyperinflation of this idea of child vulnerability. However, even in educational practices that focus on working with issues of gender and sexuality in school contexts, we observe that minority can be thought of in conservative perspectives and without agency, as discussed in the second session. To tension these logics, we point out the dimension of playfulness and play as conceptual and methodological tools that can contribute to a non-pedagogical approach to sexuality and gender in the field of education.
从保护到指导:在教育中关于性别和性的辩论中围绕儿童的实践和论述动员
这篇文章讨论了在关于教育中性别和性主题的合法性的对抗中,如何触发了一些童年的感觉,考虑到这个国家的当代情况。为此,我们的目的是分析两个已被巩固的实践-话语陷阱。第一个是由反性别攻势的行动者打造的,它包括弱势儿童的叙事构建,需要保护,并引发道德恐慌,反对在学校讨论性别和性行为。第二个,更微妙的陷阱,涉及学生在学校环境中的被动地位,这是教师指导的主题-包括在课堂上讨论性别和性问题时。“性别理论家”的儿童囚犯的形象,被动和处于危险之中,充斥在第一届会议分析的发言中,并使我们能够讨论由于儿童易受伤害这一概念的恶性膨胀而减轻的政治用途。然而,即使在专注于学校环境中性别和性行为问题的教育实践中,我们也观察到,正如第二届会议所讨论的那样,少数群体可以从保守的角度和没有代理的角度来考虑。为了使这些逻辑紧张,我们指出游戏性的维度和游戏作为概念和方法工具,可以有助于在教育领域对性和性别的非教学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信