RADIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF LEAD APRON INTEGRITY IN FIVE SELECTED HOSPITALS IN ABUJA, NIGERIA

Ibrahim Ilupeju
{"title":"RADIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF LEAD APRON INTEGRITY IN FIVE SELECTED HOSPITALS IN ABUJA, NIGERIA","authors":"Ibrahim Ilupeju","doi":"10.48153/jrrs/2021/szcv3165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The general consensus is that any exposure to ionising radiation carries a risk. Diagnostic radiology is the largest (87%) contributor to man-made ionising radiation, therefore any economical and socially acceptable means of reducing dose without compromising the diagnostic value of the procedure must be worth implementing.\n\nAim: This study is aimed at evaluating lead apron integrity in five selected Hospitals in Abuja, Nigeria. \n\nMethodology: The methodology approach includes the application of a large area beam for transmission measurement with the placement of OSLD before and behind the ten (10) lead aprons to determine the entrance and exit dose as well as the transmission factor. In this study, a lead apron consisting of 0.25mm and 0.35mm thickness were examined.\n\nResults: The result shows that the transmittance factor of the entrance and exit dose through the lead equivalent aprons is directly proportional to the age of the apron with NHA1 having the highest transmission factor (0.83) and oldest age (16 years). WGH2 has the lowest transfer factor (0.12) and the least age (1 year).\n\nConclusion: Lead aprons loses their attenuation capability over time and should be replaced after 15 years at most for effective protection against ionizing radiation.","PeriodicalId":16919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiography and Radiation Sciences","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiography and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48153/jrrs/2021/szcv3165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The general consensus is that any exposure to ionising radiation carries a risk. Diagnostic radiology is the largest (87%) contributor to man-made ionising radiation, therefore any economical and socially acceptable means of reducing dose without compromising the diagnostic value of the procedure must be worth implementing. Aim: This study is aimed at evaluating lead apron integrity in five selected Hospitals in Abuja, Nigeria. Methodology: The methodology approach includes the application of a large area beam for transmission measurement with the placement of OSLD before and behind the ten (10) lead aprons to determine the entrance and exit dose as well as the transmission factor. In this study, a lead apron consisting of 0.25mm and 0.35mm thickness were examined. Results: The result shows that the transmittance factor of the entrance and exit dose through the lead equivalent aprons is directly proportional to the age of the apron with NHA1 having the highest transmission factor (0.83) and oldest age (16 years). WGH2 has the lowest transfer factor (0.12) and the least age (1 year). Conclusion: Lead aprons loses their attenuation capability over time and should be replaced after 15 years at most for effective protection against ionizing radiation.
尼日利亚阿布贾五家选定医院铅围裙完整性的放射学评价
背景:普遍的共识是任何电离辐射暴露都有风险。诊断放射学是人为电离辐射的最大贡献者(87%),因此,任何经济和社会可接受的减少剂量而不损害该程序诊断价值的方法都必须值得实施。目的:本研究旨在评估尼日利亚阿布贾五家选定医院的铅围裙完整性。方法学:方法学方法包括应用大面积光束进行透射测量,并在十(10)个铅围裙前后放置OSLD,以确定入口和出口剂量以及透射系数。本研究以0.25mm和0.35mm厚度的铅胶圈为研究对象。结果:铅当量围裙进出剂量的透过系数与围裙的年龄成正比,其中NHA1透过系数最高(0.83),年龄最大(16岁)。WGH2的转移因子最低(0.12),年龄最小(1岁)。结论:铅围裙随着使用时间的推移衰减能力逐渐丧失,最长使用15年后应更换,方可有效防护电离辐射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信