Gender and social conformity: Do men and women respond differently to social pressure to vote?

IF 1.8 3区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Social Influence Pub Date : 2018-02-04 DOI:10.1080/15534510.2018.1432500

Aaron C. Weinschenk, Costas Panagopoulos, Karly Drabot, S. van der Linden

引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we re-analyze data from a large-scale field experiment (N = 344,084) on voter turnout in order to determine whether men and women respond differently to social pressure aimed at voter mobilization. To date, there have been mixed results regarding the interaction between a person’s gender and receptivity to social influence. On the whole, our analyses confirm prior findings that social pressure increases voter turnout but uncover little to no evidence of gender differences in receptivity to social pressure cues in the context of political participation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

性别与社会从众:男性和女性对投票的社会压力的反应不同吗?

摘要本文重新分析了一项大规模现场实验(N = 344,084)的投票率数据，以确定男性和女性对旨在动员选民的社会压力的反应是否不同。迄今为止，关于一个人的性别和对社会影响的接受程度之间的相互作用，结果好坏参半。总的来说，我们的分析证实了先前的发现，即社会压力会增加选民投票率，但在政治参与的背景下，几乎没有证据表明性别对社会压力线索的接受程度存在差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Social Influence PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Social Influence is a journal that provides an integrated focus for research into this important, dynamic, and multi-disciplinary field. Topics covered include: conformity, norms, social influence tactics such as norm of reciprocity, authority, scarcity, interpersonal influence, persuasion, power, advertising, mass media effects, political persuasion, propaganda, comparative influence, compliance, minority influence, influence in groups, cultic influence, social movements, social contagions, rumors, resistance to influence, influence across cultures, and the history of influence research.