Diakite Sandaly, M. Francis, C. Naby, Soumaoro Labile Togba, D. Mamoudou, F. Houssein, F. Naby, C. Mariame, Camara Fode Lansana, Diakité Saikou Yaya, T. Aboubacar, D. Taran
{"title":"Contribution of Imaging to the Management of Surgical Emergencies in the General Surgery Department of the Ignace Deen National Hospital","authors":"Diakite Sandaly, M. Francis, C. Naby, Soumaoro Labile Togba, D. Mamoudou, F. Houssein, F. Naby, C. Mariame, Camara Fode Lansana, Diakité Saikou Yaya, T. Aboubacar, D. Taran","doi":"10.11648/J.JS.20200806.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this work was to eassess the contribution of imaging in the management of non-traumatic abdominal surgical emergencies at the General Surgery Department of the Ignace Deen National Hospital. Material and methods: This was a prospective, descriptive study that included for 6 months all patients admitted and operated for a non-traumatic abdominal surgical emergency and having performed at least one imaging test. Results: During our study period, Non-traumatic abdominal surgical emergencies accounted for 25.27% of admissions. The average age was37.58 years old with a male predominance (65.3%) and a sex ratio of 1.88. The mean consultation time was 66.92h±40.15. PSA was the most performed imaging test (86.44%) followed by abdominal ultrasound (8.47%). The main non-traumatic abdominal surgical emergencies observed were acute generalized peritonitis (45.8%), followed by acute intestinal obstruction (44.1%). The agreement between imaging and operative diagnosis was 93.46% on PSA, 92.86% on abdominal ultrasound and 100% on abdominal CT. Conclusion: Non-traumatic abdominal surgical emergencies are frequent, imaging examinations (ASP, ultrasound) allow a good appreciation of all non-traumatic abdominal emergencies when they are judiciously used. In addition, CT, although essential, remains inaccessible due to its cost, thus limiting its emergency use.","PeriodicalId":101237,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Surgery","volume":"60 1","pages":"217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.JS.20200806.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this work was to eassess the contribution of imaging in the management of non-traumatic abdominal surgical emergencies at the General Surgery Department of the Ignace Deen National Hospital. Material and methods: This was a prospective, descriptive study that included for 6 months all patients admitted and operated for a non-traumatic abdominal surgical emergency and having performed at least one imaging test. Results: During our study period, Non-traumatic abdominal surgical emergencies accounted for 25.27% of admissions. The average age was37.58 years old with a male predominance (65.3%) and a sex ratio of 1.88. The mean consultation time was 66.92h±40.15. PSA was the most performed imaging test (86.44%) followed by abdominal ultrasound (8.47%). The main non-traumatic abdominal surgical emergencies observed were acute generalized peritonitis (45.8%), followed by acute intestinal obstruction (44.1%). The agreement between imaging and operative diagnosis was 93.46% on PSA, 92.86% on abdominal ultrasound and 100% on abdominal CT. Conclusion: Non-traumatic abdominal surgical emergencies are frequent, imaging examinations (ASP, ultrasound) allow a good appreciation of all non-traumatic abdominal emergencies when they are judiciously used. In addition, CT, although essential, remains inaccessible due to its cost, thus limiting its emergency use.