A Comparative Test of Creative Thinking in Preschool Children and Dolphins

Dawn K. Melzer, Deidre Yeater, M. Bradley, H. Hill, Gonzalo Guerra, Kimberly Salazar, Teri T. Bolton, K. Dudzinski
{"title":"A Comparative Test of Creative Thinking in Preschool Children and Dolphins","authors":"Dawn K. Melzer, Deidre Yeater, M. Bradley, H. Hill, Gonzalo Guerra, Kimberly Salazar, Teri T. Bolton, K. Dudzinski","doi":"10.26451/abc.09.03.07.2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Creativity is considered one aspect of intelligence. Including creativity allows for more room for expression (e.g., participants can respond with movement instead of written or verbal responses) than in standard intelligence assessments. The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT; Torrance, 1974) are the leading method of assessing creative abilities in school-aged humans and above. To assess creativity in young humans and nonhuman animals, modifications must be made to facilitate nonverbal responses. In the current study, a cross-species comparison was conducted between preschoolers and bottlenose dolphins to examine responses to a modified creativity task in which both species were trained to demonstrate non-repeated behaviors to an “innovate” prompt. The resulting behaviors for the first test session were coded for fluency (number of non-repeated behaviors demonstrated), originality, and flexibility (low, moderate, or high activity level). Children and dolphins produced a similar number of non-repeated behaviors during individual test trials and also had similar originality scores. Related to flexibility, dolphins displayed more low energy activity levels compared to the children. Given the limited understanding of creative abilities in animals and young children, this comparison using a modified version of the TTCT offers exciting possibilities. These results could provide further evidence of similarities in cognitive processes for humans and nonhuman animals.","PeriodicalId":31700,"journal":{"name":"Animal Behavior and Cognition","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Behavior and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.09.03.07.2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Creativity is considered one aspect of intelligence. Including creativity allows for more room for expression (e.g., participants can respond with movement instead of written or verbal responses) than in standard intelligence assessments. The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT; Torrance, 1974) are the leading method of assessing creative abilities in school-aged humans and above. To assess creativity in young humans and nonhuman animals, modifications must be made to facilitate nonverbal responses. In the current study, a cross-species comparison was conducted between preschoolers and bottlenose dolphins to examine responses to a modified creativity task in which both species were trained to demonstrate non-repeated behaviors to an “innovate” prompt. The resulting behaviors for the first test session were coded for fluency (number of non-repeated behaviors demonstrated), originality, and flexibility (low, moderate, or high activity level). Children and dolphins produced a similar number of non-repeated behaviors during individual test trials and also had similar originality scores. Related to flexibility, dolphins displayed more low energy activity levels compared to the children. Given the limited understanding of creative abilities in animals and young children, this comparison using a modified version of the TTCT offers exciting possibilities. These results could provide further evidence of similarities in cognitive processes for humans and nonhuman animals.
学龄前儿童与海豚创造性思维的比较研究
创造力被认为是智力的一个方面。与标准的智力评估相比,将创造力纳入其中可以为表达提供更多的空间(例如,参与者可以用动作而不是书面或口头反应来回应)。托兰斯创造性思维测验(TTCT)Torrance, 1974)是评估学龄及以上人类创造能力的主要方法。为了评估年轻人类和非人类动物的创造力,必须进行修改以促进非语言反应。在目前的研究中,研究人员对学龄前儿童和宽吻海豚进行了跨物种比较,以检验它们对一项改进的创造力任务的反应。在这项任务中,两个物种都被训练成在“创新”提示下表现出不重复的行为。第一个测试阶段的结果行为被编码为流畅性(非重复行为的数量)、独创性和灵活性(低、中等或高活动水平)。在单独的测试中,儿童和海豚产生的非重复行为数量相似,独创性得分也相似。在灵活性方面,海豚比儿童表现出更低的能量活动水平。考虑到我们对动物和幼儿的创造能力的理解有限,这种使用改进版TTCT的比较提供了令人兴奋的可能性。这些结果可能为人类和非人类动物认知过程的相似性提供进一步的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书