THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY ON DIGITAL BUSINESS AGREEMENTS: BETWEEN MITIGATION AND ORIENTATION

M. Arifin, Z. Arifin, Mac Thi Hoai Thuong
{"title":"THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY ON DIGITAL BUSINESS AGREEMENTS: BETWEEN MITIGATION AND ORIENTATION","authors":"M. Arifin, Z. Arifin, Mac Thi Hoai Thuong","doi":"10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Agreement as part of civil law is one of everyday life's most frequently performed actions.  This study aims to anticipate the development of digital agreements by contextualizing the provisions of laws and regulations regarding agreements. This research is normative legal research that uses statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of the study confirm that efforts to mitigate digital agreements following contract law are by still referring to Article 1320 of the Civil Code by prioritizing four orientations to minimize risks in digital agreements. First, the preventive orientation by looking at the parties who are invited to enter into agreements. Second, the prudence and proportionality in reading the provisions in digital agreements. Third, the prudence and proportionality of digital agreements by including names as well as identities that can be contacted and can be accounted for by the parties. Fourth, prudence and proportionality in determining the object of the agreement. Furthermore, the orientation of digital agreements based on the principle of proportionality based on philosophical, sociological, and juridical aspects requires specific arrangements, particularly regarding the minimum requirements for implementing digital agreements. That is because the unique characteristics of digital agreements need special arrangements regarding the terms of the validity of digital agreements, which in general still refer to Article 1320 of the Civil Code.","PeriodicalId":52582,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Private Law Review","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesia Private Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Agreement as part of civil law is one of everyday life's most frequently performed actions.  This study aims to anticipate the development of digital agreements by contextualizing the provisions of laws and regulations regarding agreements. This research is normative legal research that uses statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of the study confirm that efforts to mitigate digital agreements following contract law are by still referring to Article 1320 of the Civil Code by prioritizing four orientations to minimize risks in digital agreements. First, the preventive orientation by looking at the parties who are invited to enter into agreements. Second, the prudence and proportionality in reading the provisions in digital agreements. Third, the prudence and proportionality of digital agreements by including names as well as identities that can be contacted and can be accounted for by the parties. Fourth, prudence and proportionality in determining the object of the agreement. Furthermore, the orientation of digital agreements based on the principle of proportionality based on philosophical, sociological, and juridical aspects requires specific arrangements, particularly regarding the minimum requirements for implementing digital agreements. That is because the unique characteristics of digital agreements need special arrangements regarding the terms of the validity of digital agreements, which in general still refer to Article 1320 of the Civil Code.
数字商业协议的比例原则:缓解与定向之间的关系
协议作为民法的一部分,是日常生活中最常见的行为之一。本研究旨在通过将有关协议的法律法规规定置于背景下,预测数字协议的发展。本研究是使用成文法和概念方法的规范性法律研究。研究结果证实,在合同法之后减少数字协议的努力仍然是参考《民法典》第1320条,优先考虑四个方向,以最大限度地降低数字协议的风险。首先,通过审查被邀请签订协议的各方的预防性方针。第二,解读数字协议条款的审慎性和相称性。第三,数字协议的审慎性和相称性,包括双方可以联系和解释的姓名和身份。第四,确定协议对象的审慎性和相称性。此外,基于基于哲学、社会学和法律方面的比例原则的数字协议的取向需要具体安排,特别是关于实施数字协议的最低要求。这是因为数字协议的独特特征需要对数字协议的有效性条款进行特殊安排,这些条款通常仍指《民法典》第1320条。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信