Encouraging compliance: bonuses versus fines in inspection games

IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Daniele Nosenzo, T. Offerman, Martin Sefton, A. V. D. Veen
{"title":"Encouraging compliance: bonuses versus fines in inspection games","authors":"Daniele Nosenzo, T. Offerman, Martin Sefton, A. V. D. Veen","doi":"10.1093/JLEO/EWT001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article we examine the effectiveness of bonuses and fines in an \"inspection game,\" where costly inspection allows an authority to detect whether or not an individual complies with some standard of behavior. Standard game theoretic analysis predicts that in the inspection game non-compliant behavior is deterred by fines targeted at non-compliant individuals, but encouraged by bonuses awarded to compliant individuals. In an experiment we find that fines are effective in deterring non-compliance. However, in agreement with recent behavioral theories, we find that the effect of bonuses on compliance is much weaker than predicted. (JEL C72, C92, K42).","PeriodicalId":47987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law Economics & Organization","volume":"59 1","pages":"623-648"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law Economics & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JLEO/EWT001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

In this article we examine the effectiveness of bonuses and fines in an "inspection game," where costly inspection allows an authority to detect whether or not an individual complies with some standard of behavior. Standard game theoretic analysis predicts that in the inspection game non-compliant behavior is deterred by fines targeted at non-compliant individuals, but encouraged by bonuses awarded to compliant individuals. In an experiment we find that fines are effective in deterring non-compliance. However, in agreement with recent behavioral theories, we find that the effect of bonuses on compliance is much weaker than predicted. (JEL C72, C92, K42).
鼓励合规:检查游戏中的奖金vs罚款
在本文中,我们研究了“检查游戏”中奖金和罚款的有效性,其中昂贵的检查允许当局检测个人是否遵守某些行为标准。标准博弈论分析预测,在检查博弈中,违规行为被针对违规个体的罚款所遏制,而被奖励给合规个体的奖金所鼓励。在一项实验中,我们发现罚款对阻止违规行为是有效的。然而,与最近的行为理论一致,我们发现奖金对合规的影响远远弱于预期。(jel c72, c92, k42)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信