Temperature Microclimate Near a Tropical Rainforest Waterfall

Q2 Social Sciences
J. Senkbeil, Hannah Briner, W. Schaefer, Alexis Clouser, Chloe McCrary, Luke Plescia, Joseph Omer, Colin O’Leary Helmers, Caylin Kliner, Makayla Dorroh, Sydney Ott
{"title":"Temperature Microclimate Near a Tropical Rainforest Waterfall","authors":"J. Senkbeil, Hannah Briner, W. Schaefer, Alexis Clouser, Chloe McCrary, Luke Plescia, Joseph Omer, Colin O’Leary Helmers, Caylin Kliner, Makayla Dorroh, Sydney Ott","doi":"10.1080/23754931.2021.1929421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The temperature microclimate of a tropical rainforest waterfall was evaluated over a six-day period in February 2020. Observations at the waterfall were compared to a weather station located in a small rainforest clearing at a research center more than 1 km away. Results found that the research center weather station was significantly warmer than all five waterfall sensors for all observations supporting previous research findings of warmer temperatures at forest clearing sites compared to forest with intact canopy. There were additional significant differences among sensors surrounding the waterfall, with results showing that sensors closer to the waterfall were the coldest. Because diurnal heating was believed to be the primary contributor to the significant results, tests were run for only the nocturnal hours to evaluate the robustness of the results. The research center weather station was still significantly warmer than all of the waterfall sensors for nocturnal hours with distance away from the waterfall again being the primary reason why there were significant differences between the waterfall sensors. It is hypothesized that modest evaporational cooling in a high-humidity environment due to downsloping winds at night is responsible for several low temperature outliers at four of the waterfall sensors.","PeriodicalId":36897,"journal":{"name":"Papers in Applied Geography","volume":"3 1","pages":"1 - 11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Papers in Applied Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23754931.2021.1929421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The temperature microclimate of a tropical rainforest waterfall was evaluated over a six-day period in February 2020. Observations at the waterfall were compared to a weather station located in a small rainforest clearing at a research center more than 1 km away. Results found that the research center weather station was significantly warmer than all five waterfall sensors for all observations supporting previous research findings of warmer temperatures at forest clearing sites compared to forest with intact canopy. There were additional significant differences among sensors surrounding the waterfall, with results showing that sensors closer to the waterfall were the coldest. Because diurnal heating was believed to be the primary contributor to the significant results, tests were run for only the nocturnal hours to evaluate the robustness of the results. The research center weather station was still significantly warmer than all of the waterfall sensors for nocturnal hours with distance away from the waterfall again being the primary reason why there were significant differences between the waterfall sensors. It is hypothesized that modest evaporational cooling in a high-humidity environment due to downsloping winds at night is responsible for several low temperature outliers at four of the waterfall sensors.
热带雨林瀑布附近的温度小气候
在2020年2月对热带雨林瀑布的温度小气候进行了为期6天的评估。研究人员将瀑布上的观测结果与位于1公里外一个研究中心的小型雨林空地上的气象站进行了比较。结果发现,研究中心气象站的所有观测结果都明显高于所有五个瀑布传感器,这些观测结果支持了先前的研究结果,即森林采伐点的温度高于完整冠层的森林。在瀑布周围的传感器之间还有其他显著差异,结果表明靠近瀑布的传感器最冷。由于白天的供暖被认为是产生重要结果的主要因素,因此仅在夜间进行测试,以评估结果的稳健性。研究中心气象站在夜间的温度仍然明显高于所有的瀑布传感器,距离瀑布的距离再次成为瀑布传感器之间存在显著差异的主要原因。据推测,由于夜间的下坡风,在高湿环境中适度的蒸发冷却是造成四个瀑布传感器几个低温异常值的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Papers in Applied Geography
Papers in Applied Geography Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信