Novel Integrated Multi-Disciplinary Collaborative Field Development Well Planning Workflow for the Full Lifecycle of a Green Field Offshore Abu Dhabi

Javier Torres, Eglier Yanez Hernandez, Olla Kadoura, M. Zidan, M. Uijttenhout, A. Harbi, Y. A. Hammadi, Mohamed R. Al Zaabi, E. Draoui, U. Ghauri, Osama Saeed, Y. A. Katheeri, Jawad Ismail, Najem A. Qambar, D. Beaman, R. Salimov, Knut Nes
{"title":"Novel Integrated Multi-Disciplinary Collaborative Field Development Well Planning Workflow for the Full Lifecycle of a Green Field Offshore Abu Dhabi","authors":"Javier Torres, Eglier Yanez Hernandez, Olla Kadoura, M. Zidan, M. Uijttenhout, A. Harbi, Y. A. Hammadi, Mohamed R. Al Zaabi, E. Draoui, U. Ghauri, Osama Saeed, Y. A. Katheeri, Jawad Ismail, Najem A. Qambar, D. Beaman, R. Salimov, Knut Nes","doi":"10.2118/197240-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n An integrated and collaborative study was required in order to determine the most cost effective field development scenario while ensuring collision risk mitigation, to define and validate the well planning and slot allocation for the wells scheduled for the next ten years as part of the re-development due to a new sub-surface strategic scheme that was later extended to the full lifecycle of a green field offshore Abu Dhabi.\n The workflow included data, feedback and participation of four main stakeholders: Sub-surface Team, Petroleum Engineering Team, Drilling & Completion Team and Surface Facilities Engineering Team. The process started with the provision of the targets by the Petroleum Engineering Team, previously validated by the Sub-Surface Team to the Drilling & Completion Team. The second step included generation of preliminary trajectories including high-level anti-collision analysis against existing wells as well as other planned wells; this step also included validation of the Completion requirements based on the preliminary drilling schedule and equipment availability. The trajectories were then sent back to the Petroleum Engineering Team for well objectives validation and finally a multi-disciplinary session with the Surface Facilities Engineering Team, Petroleum Engineering Team and Drilling & Completion Team was executed to ensure readiness of surface installations based on the drilling schedule; as part of the outcome of this session multiple iterations occurred until alignment and agreement of all the stakeholders was achieved.\n The outcome of the workflow was the generation of full field development study including the preliminary trajectories, their respective slot allocation, high-level anti-collisions and estimated Drillex (Drilling Capex) validated and agreed by all stakeholders.\n This novel approach to the integrated multi-disciplinary collaborative field development well planning provides multiple benefits such as: 1. Fast delivery of scenarios for field development well planning, reducing the cycle time to less than half of the conventional time required. 2. Generation of multiple scenarios instead of a single scenario, allowing further optimization of cost and risk reduction without compromising expected production targets. 3. Early understanding of the completion equipment requirements to ensure availability based on the drilling schedule. 4. Quick response to unplanned changes based on the understanding of the full field scale planning allowing swapping of wells with minimum to impact on cost, risk and operations. 5. Full In-House process that represents a continuous and dynamic project allowing constant fine tuning based on new data and new models instead of a fixed time stamp, static, project with a single report outcome.","PeriodicalId":11061,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, November 11, 2019","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, November 11, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/197240-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An integrated and collaborative study was required in order to determine the most cost effective field development scenario while ensuring collision risk mitigation, to define and validate the well planning and slot allocation for the wells scheduled for the next ten years as part of the re-development due to a new sub-surface strategic scheme that was later extended to the full lifecycle of a green field offshore Abu Dhabi. The workflow included data, feedback and participation of four main stakeholders: Sub-surface Team, Petroleum Engineering Team, Drilling & Completion Team and Surface Facilities Engineering Team. The process started with the provision of the targets by the Petroleum Engineering Team, previously validated by the Sub-Surface Team to the Drilling & Completion Team. The second step included generation of preliminary trajectories including high-level anti-collision analysis against existing wells as well as other planned wells; this step also included validation of the Completion requirements based on the preliminary drilling schedule and equipment availability. The trajectories were then sent back to the Petroleum Engineering Team for well objectives validation and finally a multi-disciplinary session with the Surface Facilities Engineering Team, Petroleum Engineering Team and Drilling & Completion Team was executed to ensure readiness of surface installations based on the drilling schedule; as part of the outcome of this session multiple iterations occurred until alignment and agreement of all the stakeholders was achieved. The outcome of the workflow was the generation of full field development study including the preliminary trajectories, their respective slot allocation, high-level anti-collisions and estimated Drillex (Drilling Capex) validated and agreed by all stakeholders. This novel approach to the integrated multi-disciplinary collaborative field development well planning provides multiple benefits such as: 1. Fast delivery of scenarios for field development well planning, reducing the cycle time to less than half of the conventional time required. 2. Generation of multiple scenarios instead of a single scenario, allowing further optimization of cost and risk reduction without compromising expected production targets. 3. Early understanding of the completion equipment requirements to ensure availability based on the drilling schedule. 4. Quick response to unplanned changes based on the understanding of the full field scale planning allowing swapping of wells with minimum to impact on cost, risk and operations. 5. Full In-House process that represents a continuous and dynamic project allowing constant fine tuning based on new data and new models instead of a fixed time stamp, static, project with a single report outcome.
Abu Dhabi海上绿色油田全生命周期的新型集成多学科协作油田开发井规划工作流程
为了确定最具成本效益的油田开发方案,同时确保降低碰撞风险,需要进行综合协作研究,以确定和验证未来十年计划中的井的规划和槽位分配,作为重新开发的一部分,由于一项新的地下战略计划后来扩展到阿布扎比海上绿色油田的整个生命周期。工作流程包括数据、反馈和四个主要利益相关者的参与:地下团队、石油工程团队、钻井完井团队和地面设施工程团队。该过程首先由石油工程团队提供目标,然后由地下团队向钻完井团队进行验证。第二步包括生成初步轨迹,包括对现有井和其他计划井进行高级防碰撞分析;该步骤还包括根据初步钻井计划和设备可用性验证完井要求。然后将轨迹发送回石油工程团队进行井目标验证,最后与地面设施工程团队、石油工程团队和钻完井团队进行多学科会议,以确保根据钻井计划地面设施准备就绪;作为会议结果的一部分,多次迭代发生,直到所有涉众达成一致。工作流程的结果是生成完整的油田开发研究,包括初步的轨迹、各自的槽位分配、高水平的防碰撞和所有利益相关者验证并同意的估计钻井资本支出。这种多学科协同油田开发井规划的新方法具有以下优点:快速交付现场开发井规划方案,将周期时间缩短至常规所需时间的一半以下。2. 生成多个场景,而不是单一场景,从而在不影响预期生产目标的情况下进一步优化成本和降低风险。3.尽早了解完井设备的要求,以确保钻井计划的可用性。4. 基于对整个油田规模规划的理解,对计划外变化做出快速响应,使换井对成本、风险和作业的影响降到最低。5. 完整的内部流程,代表了一个连续和动态的项目,允许基于新数据和新模型进行不断的微调,而不是固定的时间戳,静态的项目,只有单一的报告结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信