Outcomes of combination therapy with daily Tadalafil 5mg plus Tamsulosin 0.4mg to treat lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction in men with or without metabolic syndrome.

Q1 Medicine
A. Sebastianelli, S. Morselli, P. Spatafora, A. Liaci, L. Gemma, C. Zaccaro, L. Vignozzi, M. Maggi, K. McVary, S. Kaplan, C. Chapple, S. Gravas, S. Serni, M. Gacci
{"title":"Outcomes of combination therapy with daily Tadalafil 5mg plus Tamsulosin 0.4mg to treat lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction in men with or without metabolic syndrome.","authors":"A. Sebastianelli, S. Morselli, P. Spatafora, A. Liaci, L. Gemma, C. Zaccaro, L. Vignozzi, M. Maggi, K. McVary, S. Kaplan, C. Chapple, S. Gravas, S. Serni, M. Gacci","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04099-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nTo assess the impact of Tadalafil 5mg/die plus Tamsulosin 0.4mg/die combination therapy on LUTS and ED, according to presence vs. absence of Mets.\n\n\nMETHODS\n75 consecutive men presenting with ED and LUTS were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups according to MetS presence. All subjects were treated with combination therapy for 12 weeks. Patients were re-evaluated after treatment with Uroflowmetry and PVR, IPSS, IPSS QoL, OAB-q and IIEF-5.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAfter enrollment, 50 patients were included: 31(62.0%) with MetS and 19(38.0%) without MetS. At baseline, patients without MetS showed a significantly better IPSS, IIEF and OAB-q, as compared to those with MetS. After 12 weeks of combination therapy LUTS, ED and flowmetry significantly improved in both groups(p<0.001). The improvement after 12 weeks was similar between groups in all parameters(p>0.05), except for ΔOAB-q that was significantly better for patients with MetS(p=0.028). Nevertheless, total IPSS, all IPSS subscores and OAB-q were significantly better at 12 weeks in men without MetS(p<0.05). Despite IIEF-5 was significantly different at baseline, after 12 weeks of combination therapy, erectile function was similar in men with or without METS:16.3±3.8 vs 7.7±4.7(p=0.238). No serious AE was reported and complications were comparable between groups(p>0.05).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nPatients with MetS have worse LUTS and ED profiles. However, tadalafil plus tamsulosin combination treatment provided them a similar ED profile and a greater relief of OAB symptoms at the end of the trial. Combination therapy had the same safety profile in men besides MetS. Further randomized controlled trials are needed.","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04099-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

BACKGROUND To assess the impact of Tadalafil 5mg/die plus Tamsulosin 0.4mg/die combination therapy on LUTS and ED, according to presence vs. absence of Mets. METHODS 75 consecutive men presenting with ED and LUTS were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups according to MetS presence. All subjects were treated with combination therapy for 12 weeks. Patients were re-evaluated after treatment with Uroflowmetry and PVR, IPSS, IPSS QoL, OAB-q and IIEF-5. RESULTS After enrollment, 50 patients were included: 31(62.0%) with MetS and 19(38.0%) without MetS. At baseline, patients without MetS showed a significantly better IPSS, IIEF and OAB-q, as compared to those with MetS. After 12 weeks of combination therapy LUTS, ED and flowmetry significantly improved in both groups(p<0.001). The improvement after 12 weeks was similar between groups in all parameters(p>0.05), except for ΔOAB-q that was significantly better for patients with MetS(p=0.028). Nevertheless, total IPSS, all IPSS subscores and OAB-q were significantly better at 12 weeks in men without MetS(p<0.05). Despite IIEF-5 was significantly different at baseline, after 12 weeks of combination therapy, erectile function was similar in men with or without METS:16.3±3.8 vs 7.7±4.7(p=0.238). No serious AE was reported and complications were comparable between groups(p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Patients with MetS have worse LUTS and ED profiles. However, tadalafil plus tamsulosin combination treatment provided them a similar ED profile and a greater relief of OAB symptoms at the end of the trial. Combination therapy had the same safety profile in men besides MetS. Further randomized controlled trials are needed.
每日他达拉非5mg加坦索罗辛0.4mg联合治疗有或无代谢综合征男性下尿路症状和勃起功能障碍的结果
背景:根据有无Mets,评估他达拉非5mg/ kg +坦索罗辛0.4mg/ kg联合治疗对LUTS和ED的影响。方法入选75例连续出现ED和LUTS的男性。根据MetS的存在将患者分为两组。所有患者均采用联合治疗12周。治疗后再用尿流仪、PVR、IPSS、IPSS QoL、OAB-q和IIEF-5对患者进行评估。结果入组后,纳入50例患者:31例(62.0%)有MetS, 19例(38.0%)无MetS。在基线时,与有MetS的患者相比,无MetS的患者IPSS、IIEF和OAB-q明显更好。联合治疗12周后,两组患者的LUTS、ED和血流测量均显著改善(p0.05),除了ΔOAB-q在met患者中显著改善(p=0.028)。然而,在没有MetS的男性中,总IPSS、所有IPSS亚评分和OAB-q在12周时明显更好(p0.05)。结论met患者有较差的LUTS和ED特征。然而,他达拉非加坦索罗辛联合治疗在试验结束时为他们提供了相似的ED特征和更大的OAB症状缓解。除了肿瘤转移,联合治疗在男性中也具有相同的安全性。需要进一步的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica publishes scientific papers on nephrology and urology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of Minerva opinion editorials, editorial comments, original articles, video illustrated articles, review articles and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信