Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Instantaneous Wave‐Free Ratio in Assessment of Lesion Hemodynamic Significance and Explanation of their Discrepancies. International, Multicenter and Prospective Trial: The FiGARO Study

T. Kovárník, Matsuo Hitoshi, A. Král, S. Jerabek, D. Zemánek, Y. Kawase, H. Omori, T. Tanigaki, J. Pudil, A. Vodzinská, M. Branny, R. Štípal, P. Kala, J. Mrózek, M. Porzer, T. Grézl, Kamil Novobílský, O. Mendiz, K. Kopřiva, M. Mates, M. Chvál, Zhi Chen, Pavel Martásek, A. Linhart
{"title":"Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Instantaneous Wave‐Free Ratio in Assessment of Lesion Hemodynamic Significance and Explanation of their Discrepancies. International, Multicenter and Prospective Trial: The FiGARO Study","authors":"T. Kovárník, Matsuo Hitoshi, A. Král, S. Jerabek, D. Zemánek, Y. Kawase, H. Omori, T. Tanigaki, J. Pudil, A. Vodzinská, M. Branny, R. Štípal, P. Kala, J. Mrózek, M. Porzer, T. Grézl, Kamil Novobílský, O. Mendiz, K. Kopřiva, M. Mates, M. Chvál, Zhi Chen, Pavel Martásek, A. Linhart","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.121.021490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The FiGARO (FFR versus iFR in Assessment of Hemodynamic Lesion Significance, and an Explanation of Their Discrepancies) trial is a prospective registry searching for predictors of fractional flow reserve/instantaneous wave‐free ratio (FFR/iFR) discrepancy. Methods and Results FFR/iFR were analyzed using a Verrata wire, and coronary flow reserve was analyzed using a Combomap machine (both Philips‐Volcano). The risk polymorphisms for endothelial nitric oxide synthase and for heme oxygenase‐1 were analyzed. In total, 1884 FFR/iFR measurements from 1564 patients were included. The FFR/iFR discrepancy occurred in 393 measurements (20.9%): FFRp (positive)/iFRn (negative) type (264 lesions, 14.0%) and FFRn/iFRp (129 lesions, 6.8%) type. Coronary flow reserve was measured in 343 lesions, correlating better with iFR (R=0.56, P<0.0001) than FFR (R=0.36, P<0.0001). The coronary flow reserve value in FFRp/iFRn lesions (2.24±0.7) was significantly higher compared with both FFRp/iFRp (1.39±0.36), and FFRn/iFRn lesions (1.8±0.64, P<0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed (1) sex, age, and lesion location in the right coronary artery as predictors for FFRp/iFRn discrepancy; and (2) hemoglobin level, smoking, and renal insufficiency as predictors for FFRn/iFRp discrepancy. The FFRn/iFRp type of discrepancy was significantly more frequent in patients with both risk types of polymorphisms (endothelial nitric oxide synthaser+heme oxygenase‐1r): 8 patients (24.2%) compared with FFRp/iFRn type of discrepancy: 2 patients (5.9%), P=0.03. Conclusions Predictors for FFRp/iFRn discrepancy were sex, age, and location in the right coronary artery. Predictors for FFRn/iFRp were hemoglobin level, smoking, and renal insufficiency. The risk type of polymorphism in endothelial nitric oxide synthase and heme oxygenase‐1 genes was more frequently found in patients with FFRn/iFRp type of discrepancy. Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03033810.","PeriodicalId":17189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","volume":"110 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.021490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background The FiGARO (FFR versus iFR in Assessment of Hemodynamic Lesion Significance, and an Explanation of Their Discrepancies) trial is a prospective registry searching for predictors of fractional flow reserve/instantaneous wave‐free ratio (FFR/iFR) discrepancy. Methods and Results FFR/iFR were analyzed using a Verrata wire, and coronary flow reserve was analyzed using a Combomap machine (both Philips‐Volcano). The risk polymorphisms for endothelial nitric oxide synthase and for heme oxygenase‐1 were analyzed. In total, 1884 FFR/iFR measurements from 1564 patients were included. The FFR/iFR discrepancy occurred in 393 measurements (20.9%): FFRp (positive)/iFRn (negative) type (264 lesions, 14.0%) and FFRn/iFRp (129 lesions, 6.8%) type. Coronary flow reserve was measured in 343 lesions, correlating better with iFR (R=0.56, P<0.0001) than FFR (R=0.36, P<0.0001). The coronary flow reserve value in FFRp/iFRn lesions (2.24±0.7) was significantly higher compared with both FFRp/iFRp (1.39±0.36), and FFRn/iFRn lesions (1.8±0.64, P<0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed (1) sex, age, and lesion location in the right coronary artery as predictors for FFRp/iFRn discrepancy; and (2) hemoglobin level, smoking, and renal insufficiency as predictors for FFRn/iFRp discrepancy. The FFRn/iFRp type of discrepancy was significantly more frequent in patients with both risk types of polymorphisms (endothelial nitric oxide synthaser+heme oxygenase‐1r): 8 patients (24.2%) compared with FFRp/iFRn type of discrepancy: 2 patients (5.9%), P=0.03. Conclusions Predictors for FFRp/iFRn discrepancy were sex, age, and location in the right coronary artery. Predictors for FFRn/iFRp were hemoglobin level, smoking, and renal insufficiency. The risk type of polymorphism in endothelial nitric oxide synthase and heme oxygenase‐1 genes was more frequently found in patients with FFRn/iFRp type of discrepancy. Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03033810.
血流储备分数与瞬时无波比评估病变血流动力学意义及其差异的解释。国际、多中心和前瞻性试验:FiGARO研究
FiGARO (FFR与iFR在评估血流动力学病变意义中的差异及其解释)试验是一项前瞻性注册研究,旨在寻找分数血流储备/瞬时无波比(FFR/iFR)差异的预测因子。方法和结果使用Verrata钢丝分析FFR/iFR,使用Combomap机(Philips‐Volcano)分析冠状动脉血流储备。内皮型一氧化氮合酶和血红素加氧酶‐1的风险多态性进行了分析。总共纳入了1564例患者的1884个FFR/iFR测量值。FFR/iFR差异发生在393例(20.9%):FFRp(阳性)/iFRn(阴性)型(264例,14.0%)和FFRn/iFRp(129例,6.8%)型。在343个病变中测量冠脉血流储备,与iFR (R=0.56, P<0.0001)的相关性优于与FFR (R=0.36, P<0.0001)的相关性。FFRp/iFRn病变冠脉血流储备值(2.24±0.7)明显高于FFRp/iFRp病变(1.39±0.36)和FFRn/iFRn病变(1.8±0.64,P<0.0001)。多变量logistic回归分析证实(1)性别、年龄和右冠状动脉病变位置是FFRp/iFRn差异的预测因素;(2)血红蛋白水平、吸烟和肾功能不全作为FFRn/iFRp差异的预测因子。两种风险型多态性(内皮型一氧化氮合酶+血红素加氧酶- 1r)的患者中,FFRn/iFRp型差异更常见:8例(24.2%),而FFRp/iFRn型差异2例(5.9%),P=0.03。结论FFRp/iFRn差异的预测因子为性别、年龄和右冠状动脉位置。FFRn/iFRp的预测因子为血红蛋白水平、吸烟和肾功能不全。内皮型一氧化氮合酶和血红素加氧酶- 1基因多态性的风险型在FFRn/iFRp型差异患者中更为常见。注册网址:https://clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT03033810。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信