Legal and political intervention on language issues in Bangladesh: A sociolinguistic perspective

IF 0.5 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
A. Awal
{"title":"Legal and political intervention on language issues in Bangladesh: A sociolinguistic perspective","authors":"A. Awal","doi":"10.30659/ijsunissula.2.1.22-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article outlined the legal and political intervention on language issues in Bangladesh from a historical sociolinguistic perspective. More specifically, it chronologically criticised the constitution and laws issued regarding language for the time being by state holders. In his article, the author tried to present the current issue and the question of language policy and planning in Bangladesh. Furthermore, it showed the drawbacks of previous language acts in Bangladesh. Consequently, the article illustrates the contextual interplay between language policy and linguistic rights in Bangladesh. This article used data from primary sources (constitution and government orders, ordinances, and circulations, etc.) to draw some preliminary conclusions about the challenges involved in the language controversy. One of its central themes was the linguistic rights of ethnic people, minor communities, and indigenous language speakers respectively. This article investigated how state politics and language historically affected each other. The analytical framework of the article is built on Language Education Policy (LEP) as a conceptual framework of Baldauf and Ingram (2003) which is one of the most widely researched theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning. The findings confirmed linguistic hegemony and dominance in Bangladesh by constitution and law. The most important contribution of the article was the sociolinguistic overview of the significant language laws of Bangladesh chronologically. It provided recommendations on the development of democratic language policy in Bangladesh.Keywords: Language in the Mughal period; Language in the British period; Language in the Pakistan period; Language in the Bangladesh period; Language rights for indigenous people; Language debate; Linguistic rights.","PeriodicalId":41508,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/ijsunissula.2.1.22-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article outlined the legal and political intervention on language issues in Bangladesh from a historical sociolinguistic perspective. More specifically, it chronologically criticised the constitution and laws issued regarding language for the time being by state holders. In his article, the author tried to present the current issue and the question of language policy and planning in Bangladesh. Furthermore, it showed the drawbacks of previous language acts in Bangladesh. Consequently, the article illustrates the contextual interplay between language policy and linguistic rights in Bangladesh. This article used data from primary sources (constitution and government orders, ordinances, and circulations, etc.) to draw some preliminary conclusions about the challenges involved in the language controversy. One of its central themes was the linguistic rights of ethnic people, minor communities, and indigenous language speakers respectively. This article investigated how state politics and language historically affected each other. The analytical framework of the article is built on Language Education Policy (LEP) as a conceptual framework of Baldauf and Ingram (2003) which is one of the most widely researched theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning. The findings confirmed linguistic hegemony and dominance in Bangladesh by constitution and law. The most important contribution of the article was the sociolinguistic overview of the significant language laws of Bangladesh chronologically. It provided recommendations on the development of democratic language policy in Bangladesh.Keywords: Language in the Mughal period; Language in the British period; Language in the Pakistan period; Language in the Bangladesh period; Language rights for indigenous people; Language debate; Linguistic rights.
孟加拉对语言问题的法律和政治干预:社会语言学的视角
本文从历史社会语言学的角度概述了孟加拉国对语言问题的法律和政治干预。更具体地说,它按时间顺序批评了当时由国家持有者发布的关于语言的宪法和法律。在他的文章中,作者试图提出当前的问题以及孟加拉国的语言政策和规划问题。此外,它还显示了孟加拉国以前的语言行为的缺点。因此,本文阐明了孟加拉国语言政策与语言权利之间的语境相互作用。本文使用主要来源的数据(宪法和政府命令、条例和流通等)来得出一些关于语言争议所涉及的挑战的初步结论。其中心主题之一是少数民族人民、少数民族社区和土著语言使用者的语言权利。本文考察了国家政治与语言在历史上是如何相互影响的。本文的分析框架以Baldauf和Ingram(2003)的语言教育政策(LEP)为概念框架,这是语言政策和规划中研究最广泛的理论视角之一。调查结果证实了孟加拉国宪法和法律的语言霸权和主导地位。这篇文章最重要的贡献是按时间顺序对孟加拉国重要语言法的社会语言学概述。它就在孟加拉国制订民主的语文政策提出了建议。关键词:莫卧儿时期语言;英国时期的语言;巴基斯坦时期的语言;孟加拉时期的语言;土著人民的语言权利;语言辩论;语言的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信