M. Sueoka, A. Sawada, H. Tanabe, Y. Okada, S. Taniuchi, N. Okuuchi, M. Tanooka, M. Kokubo, K. Yamakado
{"title":"Verification of Dosimetric and Positional Accuracy of Dynamic Tumor Tracking Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy","authors":"M. Sueoka, A. Sawada, H. Tanabe, Y. Okada, S. Taniuchi, N. Okuuchi, M. Tanooka, M. Kokubo, K. Yamakado","doi":"10.4236/ijmpcero.2019.84019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: We performed both, dosimetric and positional accuracy verification of \ndynamic tumor tracking (DTT) intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), with \nthe Vero4DRT system using a moving phantom (QUASAR respiratory motion platform; \nQUASAR phantom) and system log files. Methods: The QUASAR phantom was placed on a treatment couch. Measurement of the \npoint dose and dose distribution was performed for conventional IMRT, with the \nQUASAR phantom static and moving; for DTT IMRT, this was performed with the \nphantom moving for pyramid shaped, prostate, paranasal sinus, and pancreas \ntargets. The QUASAR phantom was driven by a sinusoidal signal in the \nsuperior-inferior direction. Furthermore, predicted positional errors induced \nby the Vero4DRT system and mechanical positional errors of the gimbal head, \nwere calculated using the system log files. Results and Conclusion: For DTT IMRT, the dose at the evaluation point was within 3% compared \nwith the verification plan, and the dose distribution in the passing rates of γ \nwas 97.9%, with the criteria of 3% dose and 3 mm distance to agreement. The \nposition error calculated from the log files was within 2 mm, suggesting the \nfeasibility of employing DTT IMRT with high accuracy using the Vero4DRT system.","PeriodicalId":14028,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology","volume":"116 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ijmpcero.2019.84019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: We performed both, dosimetric and positional accuracy verification of
dynamic tumor tracking (DTT) intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), with
the Vero4DRT system using a moving phantom (QUASAR respiratory motion platform;
QUASAR phantom) and system log files. Methods: The QUASAR phantom was placed on a treatment couch. Measurement of the
point dose and dose distribution was performed for conventional IMRT, with the
QUASAR phantom static and moving; for DTT IMRT, this was performed with the
phantom moving for pyramid shaped, prostate, paranasal sinus, and pancreas
targets. The QUASAR phantom was driven by a sinusoidal signal in the
superior-inferior direction. Furthermore, predicted positional errors induced
by the Vero4DRT system and mechanical positional errors of the gimbal head,
were calculated using the system log files. Results and Conclusion: For DTT IMRT, the dose at the evaluation point was within 3% compared
with the verification plan, and the dose distribution in the passing rates of γ
was 97.9%, with the criteria of 3% dose and 3 mm distance to agreement. The
position error calculated from the log files was within 2 mm, suggesting the
feasibility of employing DTT IMRT with high accuracy using the Vero4DRT system.