Iterative Quality Control Strategies for Expert Medical Image Labeling

B. Freeman, N. Hammel, Sonia Phene, Abigail E. Huang, Rebecca Ackermann, Olga Kanzheleva, Miles Hutson, Caitlin Taggart, Q. Duong, R. Sayres
{"title":"Iterative Quality Control Strategies for Expert Medical Image Labeling","authors":"B. Freeman, N. Hammel, Sonia Phene, Abigail E. Huang, Rebecca Ackermann, Olga Kanzheleva, Miles Hutson, Caitlin Taggart, Q. Duong, R. Sayres","doi":"10.1609/hcomp.v9i1.18940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data quality is a key concern for artificial intelligence (AI) efforts that rely on crowdsourced data collection. In the domain of medicine in particular, labeled data must meet high quality standards, or the resulting AI may perpetuate biases or lead to patient harm. What are the challenges involved in expert medical labeling? How do AI practitioners address such challenges? In this study, we interviewed members of teams developing AI for medical imaging in four subdomains (ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and dermatology) about their quality-related practices. We describe one instance of low-quality labeling being caught by automated monitoring. The more proactive strategy, however, is to partner with experts in a collaborative, iterative process prior to the start of high-volume data collection. Best practices including 1) co-designing labeling tasks and instructional guidelines with experts, 2) piloting and revising the tasks and guidelines, and 3) onboarding workers enable teams to identify and address issues before they proliferate.","PeriodicalId":87339,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1609/hcomp.v9i1.18940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Data quality is a key concern for artificial intelligence (AI) efforts that rely on crowdsourced data collection. In the domain of medicine in particular, labeled data must meet high quality standards, or the resulting AI may perpetuate biases or lead to patient harm. What are the challenges involved in expert medical labeling? How do AI practitioners address such challenges? In this study, we interviewed members of teams developing AI for medical imaging in four subdomains (ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and dermatology) about their quality-related practices. We describe one instance of low-quality labeling being caught by automated monitoring. The more proactive strategy, however, is to partner with experts in a collaborative, iterative process prior to the start of high-volume data collection. Best practices including 1) co-designing labeling tasks and instructional guidelines with experts, 2) piloting and revising the tasks and guidelines, and 3) onboarding workers enable teams to identify and address issues before they proliferate.
专家医学图像标注的迭代质量控制策略
对于依赖众包数据收集的人工智能(AI)工作来说,数据质量是一个关键问题。特别是在医学领域,标记数据必须符合高质量标准,否则由此产生的人工智能可能会延续偏见或导致患者伤害。专家医疗标签有哪些挑战?人工智能从业者如何应对这些挑战?在这项研究中,我们采访了在四个子领域(眼科、放射学、病理学和皮肤病学)为医学成像开发人工智能的团队成员,了解他们的质量相关实践。我们描述了一个被自动监控捕获的低质量标签的实例。然而,更积极的策略是在开始大量数据收集之前与专家合作,进行协作和迭代过程。最佳实践包括1)与专家共同设计标签任务和指导方针,2)试点和修改任务和指导方针,以及3)入职员工使团队能够在问题扩散之前识别和解决问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信