The stewardship organization: essential characteristics and conditions of feasibility

IF 1.1 Q4 BUSINESS
M. Lehrer, L. Segal
{"title":"The stewardship organization: essential characteristics and conditions of feasibility","authors":"M. Lehrer, L. Segal","doi":"10.1108/AJB-04-2020-0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper explores the nature and facilitating conditions of “stewardship organizations,” that is, organizations in which stewardship behavior rather than principal–agent behavior defines the operative principles of management.,The paper falls into two parts: the first part of the analysis develops a theory of the stewardship organization, and the second part develops a contingency framework concerning the feasibility of stewardship organizations.,Stewardship organizations are characterized by three interlocking traits: (1) the overall mission of the organization, (2) the organization's internal control systems and (3) the “motivational environment” of the stewardship organization. Since stewardship organizations cannot be identified on the basis of stated mission alone, it is necessary to determine whether the mission involves a higher calling that has been internalized by organizational members to the point of constituting a vital part of how the organization runs on a day-to-day basis.,One key role of leadership in such organizations is to manage mission drift and to reduce the ambiguity of the mission and organization goals.,Litmus tests are proposed for identifying an authentic stewardship organization in contradistinction to those whose socially minded values are ancillary or a marketing ploy.,This is the first systematic attempt to characterize the stewardship organization. After providing three specific examples of such organizations, the contribution identifies key markers of bona fide stewardship organizations.","PeriodicalId":44116,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Business","volume":"61 1","pages":"175-190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/AJB-04-2020-0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The paper explores the nature and facilitating conditions of “stewardship organizations,” that is, organizations in which stewardship behavior rather than principal–agent behavior defines the operative principles of management.,The paper falls into two parts: the first part of the analysis develops a theory of the stewardship organization, and the second part develops a contingency framework concerning the feasibility of stewardship organizations.,Stewardship organizations are characterized by three interlocking traits: (1) the overall mission of the organization, (2) the organization's internal control systems and (3) the “motivational environment” of the stewardship organization. Since stewardship organizations cannot be identified on the basis of stated mission alone, it is necessary to determine whether the mission involves a higher calling that has been internalized by organizational members to the point of constituting a vital part of how the organization runs on a day-to-day basis.,One key role of leadership in such organizations is to manage mission drift and to reduce the ambiguity of the mission and organization goals.,Litmus tests are proposed for identifying an authentic stewardship organization in contradistinction to those whose socially minded values are ancillary or a marketing ploy.,This is the first systematic attempt to characterize the stewardship organization. After providing three specific examples of such organizations, the contribution identifies key markers of bona fide stewardship organizations.
管理组织的基本特征和可行性条件
本文探讨了“管理组织”的性质和促进条件,即管理行为而不是委托代理行为定义管理的运作原则的组织。本文分为两部分:第一部分是对管理型组织的理论分析,第二部分是对管理型组织可行性的权变框架分析。管理型组织具有三个相互关联的特征:(1)组织的总体使命;(2)组织的内部控制系统;(3)管理型组织的“激励环境”。由于不能仅根据所陈述的使命来确定管理型组织,因此有必要确定该使命是否包含由组织成员内化的更高的召唤,从而构成组织日常运作的重要组成部分。在这样的组织中,领导的一个关键作用是管理任务漂移,减少任务和组织目标的模糊性。提出石蕊试法,以确定一个真正的管理组织,而不是那些具有社会意识的价值观是辅助或营销策略的组织。这是第一次系统地描述管理组织的特征。在提供了这类组织的三个具体例子之后,文章确定了真正的管理组织的关键标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信