Psycho-Ecological Systems Model: A Systems Approach to Planning and Gauging the Community Impact of Community-Engaged Scholarship

R. Reeb, Nyssa L Snow-Hill, Susan F. Folger, Anne L. Steel, L. Stayton, C. A. Hunt, Bernadette D. O'Koon, Zachary Glendening
{"title":"Psycho-Ecological Systems Model: A Systems Approach to Planning and Gauging the Community Impact of Community-Engaged Scholarship","authors":"R. Reeb, Nyssa L Snow-Hill, Susan F. Folger, Anne L. Steel, L. Stayton, C. A. Hunt, Bernadette D. O'Koon, Zachary Glendening","doi":"10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0024.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the PsychoEcological Systems Model (PESM) – an integrative conceptual model rooted in General Systems Theory (GST). PESM was developed to inform and guide the development, implementation, and evaluation of transdisciplinary (and multilevel) communityengaged scholarship (e.g., a participatory community action research project undertaken by faculty that involves graduate and/or undergraduate students as servicelearning research assistants). To set the stage, the first section critiques past conceptual models. Following a description of GST, the second section provides a comprehensive description of PESM, which represents an integration of three conceptual developments: the ecological systems model (Bronfenbrenner, 1979), the biopsychosocial model (Kiesler, 2000), and the principle of reciprocal determinism (Bandura, 1978). In the third section, we discuss implications of PESM for communitybased research. A greater emphasis on the development of integrative conceptual frameworks may increase the likelihood that communitybased research projects will: (a) address complex questions; (b) develop and implement efficacious (and sustainable) transdisciplinary (and multilevel) projects; (c) assess constructs at multiple levels using a blend of quantitative and qualitative approaches; and (d) utilize multiple research designs and methods to systematically examine hypotheses regarding a project’s influence on outcome variables and process variables.","PeriodicalId":93128,"journal":{"name":"Michigan journal of community service learning","volume":"535 1","pages":"6-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan journal of community service learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0024.102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This article presents the PsychoEcological Systems Model (PESM) – an integrative conceptual model rooted in General Systems Theory (GST). PESM was developed to inform and guide the development, implementation, and evaluation of transdisciplinary (and multilevel) communityengaged scholarship (e.g., a participatory community action research project undertaken by faculty that involves graduate and/or undergraduate students as servicelearning research assistants). To set the stage, the first section critiques past conceptual models. Following a description of GST, the second section provides a comprehensive description of PESM, which represents an integration of three conceptual developments: the ecological systems model (Bronfenbrenner, 1979), the biopsychosocial model (Kiesler, 2000), and the principle of reciprocal determinism (Bandura, 1978). In the third section, we discuss implications of PESM for communitybased research. A greater emphasis on the development of integrative conceptual frameworks may increase the likelihood that communitybased research projects will: (a) address complex questions; (b) develop and implement efficacious (and sustainable) transdisciplinary (and multilevel) projects; (c) assess constructs at multiple levels using a blend of quantitative and qualitative approaches; and (d) utilize multiple research designs and methods to systematically examine hypotheses regarding a project’s influence on outcome variables and process variables.
心理生态系统模型:规划和衡量社区参与奖学金对社区影响的系统方法
本文介绍了心理生态系统模型(PESM) -一个植根于一般系统理论(GST)的综合概念模型。PESM的发展是为了告知和指导跨学科(和多层次)社区参与奖学金的发展,实施和评估(例如,由教师承担的参与式社区行动研究项目,包括研究生和/或本科生作为服务学习研究助理)。作为铺垫,第一部分对过去的概念模型进行了批判。在对GST的描述之后,第二部分提供了对PESM的全面描述,它代表了三个概念发展的整合:生态系统模型(Bronfenbrenner, 1979)、生物心理社会模型(Kiesler, 2000)和互惠决定论原则(Bandura, 1978)。在第三部分中,我们讨论了PESM对基于社区的研究的意义。更加强调综合概念框架的发展可能会增加以社区为基础的研究项目将:(A)处理复杂问题的可能性;(b)制定和实施有效(和可持续)的跨学科(和多层次)项目;(c)使用定量和定性方法混合评估多层结构;(d)利用多种研究设计和方法系统地检验关于项目对结果变量和过程变量影响的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信