Optimise: An Austrian Multicentre Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of Tocilizumab in Combination with Methotrexate versus Tocilizumab for Mild/Moderate Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate

F. LeebBurkhard, Lunzer Raimund, Fasching Peter, H. Manfred, Zamani Omid, Riedlmair Ute, Schimetta Wolfgang, B. GraningerWinfried
{"title":"Optimise: An Austrian Multicentre Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of Tocilizumab in Combination with Methotrexate versus Tocilizumab for Mild/Moderate Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate","authors":"F. LeebBurkhard, Lunzer Raimund, Fasching Peter, H. Manfred, Zamani Omid, Riedlmair Ute, Schimetta Wolfgang, B. GraningerWinfried","doi":"10.23937/2469-5726/1510074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: As data on the efficacy of biologics in patients with mild/moderate rheumatoid arthritis are limited, this study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab plus methotrexate versus tocilizumab monotherapy on disease activity. Methods: Seventy-seven patients with mild/moderate rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response (Disease Activity Score 28 > 3.2) to methotrexate were initially enrolled (mean Disease Activity Score 28 3.91 +/0.54) and received three infusions of tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks plus methotrexate. Subjects achieving a good/moderate European League Against Rheumatism response after three months of open-label treatment were randomised to Group A (tocilizumab plus methotrexate) or Group B (tocilizumab plus placebo methotrexate). The primary endpoint was the Disease Activity Score 28 change from week 12 to 24. The secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving remission according to the Disease Activity Score 28 and various disease activity indices at week 24. Results: Sixty-five patients were included in the blinded trial phase. At week 12, the mean Disease Activity Score 28 was 1.51 in Group A (n = 32) and 1.72 in Group B (n = 33). The Disease Activity Score 28 difference between the groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.19). No substantial differences were seen with regard to the secondary endpoints. Conclusions: Additional tocilizumab treatment led to improvement in patients with mild/moderate rheumatoid arthritis. The study results give no indication that the combination of Tocilizumab with Methotrexate induces a better outcome (preserving the level of disease activity achieved at week 12) in comparison with Tocilizumab monotherapy in patients corresponding to those included into the study.","PeriodicalId":73938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of rheumatic diseases and treatment","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of rheumatic diseases and treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2469-5726/1510074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As data on the efficacy of biologics in patients with mild/moderate rheumatoid arthritis are limited, this study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab plus methotrexate versus tocilizumab monotherapy on disease activity. Methods: Seventy-seven patients with mild/moderate rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response (Disease Activity Score 28 > 3.2) to methotrexate were initially enrolled (mean Disease Activity Score 28 3.91 +/0.54) and received three infusions of tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks plus methotrexate. Subjects achieving a good/moderate European League Against Rheumatism response after three months of open-label treatment were randomised to Group A (tocilizumab plus methotrexate) or Group B (tocilizumab plus placebo methotrexate). The primary endpoint was the Disease Activity Score 28 change from week 12 to 24. The secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving remission according to the Disease Activity Score 28 and various disease activity indices at week 24. Results: Sixty-five patients were included in the blinded trial phase. At week 12, the mean Disease Activity Score 28 was 1.51 in Group A (n = 32) and 1.72 in Group B (n = 33). The Disease Activity Score 28 difference between the groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.19). No substantial differences were seen with regard to the secondary endpoints. Conclusions: Additional tocilizumab treatment led to improvement in patients with mild/moderate rheumatoid arthritis. The study results give no indication that the combination of Tocilizumab with Methotrexate induces a better outcome (preserving the level of disease activity achieved at week 12) in comparison with Tocilizumab monotherapy in patients corresponding to those included into the study.
优化:奥地利多中心研究Tocilizumab联合甲氨蝶呤与Tocilizumab治疗轻/中度类风湿性关节炎的有效性和安全性,以及对甲氨蝶呤的不充分反应
背景:由于生物制剂在轻度/中度类风湿性关节炎患者中的疗效数据有限,本研究旨在评估tocilizumab联合甲氨蝶呤与tocilizumab单药治疗对疾病活动性的疗效和安全性。方法:最初纳入77例轻中度类风湿性关节炎患者,对甲氨蝶呤反应不充分(疾病活动评分28 > 3.2)(平均疾病活动评分28 3.91 +/0.54),每4周输注3次tocilizumab 8mg /kg加甲氨蝶呤。在三个月的开放标签治疗后,获得良好/中度欧洲抗风湿病联盟反应的受试者被随机分为a组(托珠单抗加甲氨蝶呤)或B组(托珠单抗加安慰剂甲氨蝶呤)。主要终点是疾病活动评分28从第12周到第24周的变化。次要终点包括根据疾病活动评分28和各种疾病活动指数在第24周达到缓解的患者比例。结果:65例患者进入盲法试验阶段。第12周,A组平均疾病活动评分为1.51 (n = 32), B组为1.72 (n = 33)。疾病活动评分28组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.19)。在次要终点方面未见实质性差异。结论:额外的tocilizumab治疗导致轻度/中度类风湿性关节炎患者的改善。研究结果没有迹象表明Tocilizumab与甲氨蝶呤联合治疗比Tocilizumab单药治疗对纳入研究的患者有更好的结果(保留第12周达到的疾病活动度)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信